Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Women’s Roles on U.S. Fortune 500 Boards: Director Expertise and Committee Memberships

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the presence and roles of female directors of U.S. Fortune 500 firms, focusing on committee assignments and director background. Prior work from almost two decades ago concludes that there is a systematic bias against females in assignment to top board committees. Examining a recent data set with a logistic regression model that controls for director and firm characteristics, director resource-dependence roles and interaction between director gender and director characteristics, we find that female directors are less likely than male directors to sit on executive committees and more likely than male directors to sit on public affairs committees. There is little if any evidence of systematic gender bias in director assignment to other board committees. We find some evidence that boards evaluate resource dependence differently for women than men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler N. J. (1984). Women in International Management: Where Are They? California Management Review 26(4):78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C. A., Anthony R. N. (1986) The New Corporate Directors: Insights for Board Members and Executives. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R., Bizjak J. (2003). An Empirical Examination of the Role of the CEO and the Compensation Committee in Structuring Executive Pay. Journal of Banking and Finance 27(7):1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1980). The Overview Committees of the Board of Directors. Business Lawyer 35:1335–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2004). One in Nine Corporate Directors of FP500 are Women in Latest Count. Women in Management Review 19(5/6):276

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: 2005, ‘Getting Women on to UK Boards’, Available online at http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/boardroom_diversity/index.htm

  • Baysinger B., Butler H. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1:101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron D. M., Block C. J., Echtenkamp A. (2006). Disabling the Able: Stereotype Threat and Women’s Work Performance. Human Performance 19(2):133–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria D. (2000). Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors. In: Burke R. J., Mattis M. C. (eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria D., Piderit S. K. (1994). Board Committee Membership: Effects of Gender-based Bias. Academy of Management Journal 37(8):1453–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P.: 1990, ‘Women in the Boardroom: Two Interpretations’, Faculty of Administrative Studies, York University, unpublished manuscript

  • Braiotta L. Jr., Sommer A. A. (1987). The Essential Guide to Effective Corporate Board Committees. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder D. (1995). Shareholders are Valuing Diversity. Directors and Boards 19(3):12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess Z., Tharenou P. (2002). Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the Few. Journal of Business Ethics 37(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (1994a). Benefits of Women on Corporate Boards of Directors as Reported by Male CEOs. Psychological Reports 75(1):329–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (1994b). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: Views of Canadian Chief Executive Officers. Women in Management Review 9(5):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (1995). Personal, Educational and Career Characteristics of Canadian Women Directors. Equal Opportunities International 14(8):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (1996). Why Aren’t More Women on Corporate Boards?: Views of Women Directors. Psychological Reports 79(3):840–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (1997). Women Directors: Selection, Acceptance, and Benefits of Board Membership. Corporate Governance 7(4):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (2000a). Company Size, Board Size and the Numbers of Women Corporate Directors. In: Burke R. J., Mattis M. C. (eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 118–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J. (2000b). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: Understanding the Context. In Burke R.J., Mattis M.C. (eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttner E. H., Moore D. P. (1997). Women’s Organizational Exodus to Entrepreneurship: Self-reported Motivations and Correlates with Success. Journal of Small Business Management 35(1):34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggins A. (1998). Equity Lacking in the Boardroom. Management Review 87(2):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter D. A., Simpkins B. J., Simpson W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value. Financial Review 38:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (1995). The CEO view: Women on Corporate Boards. Catalyst, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (2003a). Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors. Catalyst, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (2003b). Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors in Canada. Catalyst, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S., (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3d edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily C. M., Certo S.T. (1999). A Decade of Corporate Women: Some Progress in the Boardroom, None in the Executive Suite. Strategic Management Journal 20(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton D. R., Kesner I. F. (1993). Cracks in the Glass: The Silent Competence of Women. Business Horizons 36(2):6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daum, J.: 1998, ‘Women on board!’, Chief Executive, October, 40–43

  • Dogar R. (1997). Crony Baloney. Working Women 22(1):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart N. L., Werbel J. D., Shrader C. B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance 11(2):102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E., Jensen M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2):301–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell G. E., Lerner L.D. (1989). Contrasting Corporate Profiles: Women and Minority Representation in Top Management Positions. Journal of Business Ethics 8(5):341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondas N. (2000). Women on Boards of Directors: Gender Bias or Power Threat? In: Burke R. J., Mattis M. C. (eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs D., Tamkins M. M., Heilman M. E., Wallen A. S. (2004). ‘Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gendered-Typed Tasks’. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3):416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager M., Rooney P., Pollak T. (2002). How Fundraising is Carried Out in US Nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7(4):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman M. E., Haynes M. C. (2005). No Credit where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women’s Success in Male-Female Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., Cannella A. A. Jr., Paetzold R. L. (2000). The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. Journal of Management Studies 37(2):235–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., Cannella A. A. Jr., Harris I. C. (2002). Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How do Directors Differ? Journal of Management 28(6):747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jago A. G., Vroom V. H. (1982). Gender Differences in the Incidence and Evaluation of Participative Leader Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(6):770–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny R. M. (2004). Executive Committee: A Vestigial Appendage. Directors and Boards 28(4):43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner I. F. (1988). Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender. Academy of Management Journal 31(1):66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein A. (1998). Firm Productivity and Board Committee Structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41:275–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, G.: 1997, ‘A Boardroom Gender Gap; Women Say They Get Short Shrift’, Business Week, November 24, 32

  • Koretz G.: 2000, ‘Women in the Boardroom; Why Their Presence Can Be a Plus’, Business Week, September 25, 30

  • Krantz, M.: 2004, ‘More Women Take CFO Roles’, USA Today, October 12

  • Kuczynski S. (1999). If Diversity, then Higher Profits? HR Magazine 44(13): 66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, R.: 2005, ‘Now is the Time for Women to ask for a Seat at the Table’, Canadian HR Reporter, 18␣(14), August 15, 18

  • Mattis M. C. (2000). Women Corporate Directors in the United States. In: Burke R.J., Mattis M.C. (eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein I. M. (1999) Introduction to the Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. Business Lawyer 54:1057–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell L. E. (2002). Corporate Irresponsibility. Benefits Canada 26(7):23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • NASDAQ Corporate Governance Summary of Rules Changes, Revised November 2003. Available online at␣http://www.nasdaq.com/about/CorpGovSummary. pdf

  • Nieva V. F., Gutek B. A. (1980). Gender Effects on Evaluation. Academy of Management Review 5(2):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman H., Mozes H. (1999). Does the Composition of the Compensation Committee Influence CEO Compensation Practices? Financial Management 28:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NYSE Listed Company Manual, Section 3: Corporate Responsibility, 303A.00 Corporate Governance Standards. Revised November 3, 2003. Available online at http://www.NYSE.com/audience/listedcompanies.html

  • O’Neal D., Thomas H. (1995). Director Networks/Director Selection: The Board’s Strategic Role. European Management Journal 13:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J. (1973). Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization—Environmental Linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly 18:349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfeld: 1991, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New␣York)

  • Schwartz F. N. (1980). From the Boardroom: More Women than Meet the Eye. Harvard Business Review 58(2):6–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission: 1982, ‘Analysis of Results of 1981 Proxy Statement Disclosure Monitoring Program,’ Title 17 Code of Federal Regulations, sec. 241 (March), p. 38, in L. Braiotta Jr. and A.␣A. Sommer Jr.: 1987, The Essential Guide to Effective Corporate Board Committees (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

  • Sethi S. P., Swanson C. L., Harrigan K. R. (1981). Women Directors on Corporate Boards. Center for Research in Business and Social Policy University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V., Vinnicombe S. (2003). The 2002 Female FTSE Index and Women Directors. Women in Management Review 18 (7):349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SmartPros Editorial Staff, 2000: ‘Survey: Women Partners Gaining Ground at Large Firms’, available online at http://www.accountingnet.com, October 25

  • Steane P. D., Christie M. (2001). Non-profit Boards in Australia: A Distinctive Governance Approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review 9(1):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E.: 2002, ‘Family Firms Embrace Feminine Mystique – New Succession Models Take Daughters Into Account’, Wall Street Journal, March 6, B5

  • Terborg J. R., Ilgen D. R. (1975). A Theoretical Approach to Gender Discrimination in Traditionally Masculine Occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13:352–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Survey of Business Owners, July 28, 2005

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS), ‘Degrees and Other Formal Awards Conferred’ surveys, October 2002

  • Vafeos N. (2003). Further Evidence on Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation. Managerial Finance 32(2):53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisul, K.: 2003, ‘Make Way for Madame Director: Corporate Reform is Creating Unexpected Openings for Women in the Boardroom’, Business Week, December 22, 57

  • Vafeos N. (1999). The Nature of Board Nominating Committees and Their Role in Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26(1–2):199–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal J. D., Milton L. P. (2000). How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards. Administrative Science Quarterly 45:366–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R. J. (2003). Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and their Influence on Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 42(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Western Michigan University, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, U.S.A.

    Craig A. Peterson

  2. Finance and General Business, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA

    James Philpot

Authors
  1. Craig A. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Philpot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Philpot.

Additional information

Craig A. Peterson Western Michigan University, Grand Rapios, MI 49503, USA

Craig A. Peterson is associate professor of finance at Western Michigan University, Grand Rapids Regional Center. In addition to corporate governance, his research interests include investment management and corporate finance.

James Philpot is assistant professor of finance and general business at Missouri State University. His research interests include corporate governance, financial planning and financial education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, C.A., Philpot, J. Women’s Roles on U.S. Fortune 500 Boards: Director Expertise and Committee Memberships. J Bus Ethics 72, 177–196 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9164-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9164-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation