Abstract
To determine whether gambling participation falls into skill and chance-based categories and, if so, to determine the socio-demographic characteristics associated with these different categories. A cross-sectional analysis of all respondents to the 2005 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence Survey who gambled in the 12 months prior to the survey. Factor analysis was employed to determine whether a chance versus skill-based dichotomy described the structure of gambling participation. Gambler preference groups were constructed using the median of rotated factor scores. Multinomial logit regression was then used to determine independent associations between explanatory variables and categories of gambler preferences. The skill and chance-based dichotomy did describe player preferences for the sample of adult gamblers in the Northern Territory, Australia. Gender, age, household income, household structure and the geographic location (access to gambling opportunities) of respondents were all associated with different degrees of participation in skill and chance based gambling activities. Notably, respondents 35 years and over were significantly over-represented in the low-skill/high-chance participation group, and under-represented in the high-skill/low-chance group. It is clear that the term gambling is a confounding rubric that hides differences both in the type of activity and the socio-demographic profiles of participants. An examination of the latter raises important questions about the role of chance in later life, as well as the role of self-determination in gambling for other groups, particularly younger men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Rönnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 237–258.
Adams, G. R., Sullivan, A.-M., Horton, K. D., Menna, R., & Guilmette, A. M. (2007). A study of differences in Canadian university students’ gambling and proximity to a casino. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 9–17.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Australian Demographic Statistics, Sept 2007 Canberra: ABS.
Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
Clarke, D., Abbott, M., Tse, S., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2006). Gender, age, ethnic and occupational associations with pathological gambling in a New Zealand urban sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 84–91.
Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101(4), 570–580.
Delfabbro, P. (2000). Gender differences in Australian gambling: A critical summary of sociological and psychological research. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 35(2), 145–158.
Delfabbro, P., & Le Couteur, A. (2008). Australasian gambling review: Third edition (1992–2007). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia.
Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and external determinants of persistent gambling: Problems in generalising from one form of gambling to another. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–245.
Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual factors in research and clinical interventions. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 5, 1–34.
Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2001). Profiling lady luck: An empirical study of gambling and problem gambling amongst female club members. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 47–69.
Home Office. (1996). Casinos and bingo clubs: A consultation paper. London: UK Government.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.
Marshall, D. C. (2005). The gambling environment and gambler behaviour: Evidence from Richmond-Tweed, Australia. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 63–83.
Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (2000). The makings of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In K. S. Rosengren, C. N. Johnson, & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oliveira, M. P. M. T., & Silva, M. T. A. (2001). A comparison of horse-race, bingo, and video poker gamblers in Brazilian gambling settings. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 137–149.
Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries: Inquiry report No. 10. Melbourne: Productivity Commission.
Reith, G. (1999). The age of chance: Gambling in western culture. London: Routledge.
Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.
Volberg, R. A. (2003). Has there been a “feminization” of gambling and problem gambling in the United States? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 8, 1–32.
Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. E. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(4), 250–256.
Volberg, R. A., & Wray, M. (2007). Legal gambling and problem gambling as mechanisms of social domination? Some considerations for future research. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 56–85.
Walker, M. B. (1992). Irrational thinking among slot machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(3), 245–261.
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S: Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337.
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviours, 29(2), 323–335.
Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1388–1397.
Wohl, M. J. A., Young, M. M., & Hart, K. E. (2005). Untreated young gamblers with game-specific problems: Self-concept involving luck, gambling ecology and delay in seeking professional treatment. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(5), 445–459.
Worthington, A., Brown, K., Crawford, M., & Pickernell, D. (2007). Gambling participation in Australia: Findings from the national Household Expenditure Survey. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(2), 209–221.
Young, M., Abu-Duhou, I., Barnes, T., Creed, E., Morris, M., Stevens, M., et al. (2006). Northern territory gambling prevalence survey 2005. Darwin: School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University.
Young, M., & Stevens, M. (2009). Player preferences and social harm: An analysis of the relationships between player characteristics, gambling modes, and problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 262–279.
Young, M., Stevens, M., & Morris, M. (2008a). Problem gambling within the non-indigenous population of the Northern Territory of Australia: A multivariate analysis of risk factors. International Gambling Studies, 8(1), 77–93.
Young, M., Stevens, M., & Tyler, W. (2008b). Northern territory 2005 gambling prevalence survey: An extended analysis. Darwin: School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University.
Young, M., & Tyler, W. (2008). Mediating markets: Gambling venues, communities and social harm. Gambling Research, 20(1), 50–65.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the Community Benefit Fund of the Northern Territory Government, Australia, for funding the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevens, M., Young, M. Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling. J Gambl Stud 26, 89–103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9143-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9143-y