Skip to main content
Log in

Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether gambling participation falls into skill and chance-based categories and, if so, to determine the socio-demographic characteristics associated with these different categories. A cross-sectional analysis of all respondents to the 2005 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence Survey who gambled in the 12 months prior to the survey. Factor analysis was employed to determine whether a chance versus skill-based dichotomy described the structure of gambling participation. Gambler preference groups were constructed using the median of rotated factor scores. Multinomial logit regression was then used to determine independent associations between explanatory variables and categories of gambler preferences. The skill and chance-based dichotomy did describe player preferences for the sample of adult gamblers in the Northern Territory, Australia. Gender, age, household income, household structure and the geographic location (access to gambling opportunities) of respondents were all associated with different degrees of participation in skill and chance based gambling activities. Notably, respondents 35 years and over were significantly over-represented in the low-skill/high-chance participation group, and under-represented in the high-skill/low-chance group. It is clear that the term gambling is a confounding rubric that hides differences both in the type of activity and the socio-demographic profiles of participants. An examination of the latter raises important questions about the role of chance in later life, as well as the role of self-determination in gambling for other groups, particularly younger men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Rönnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 237–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G. R., Sullivan, A.-M., Horton, K. D., Menna, R., & Guilmette, A. M. (2007). A study of differences in Canadian university students’ gambling and proximity to a casino. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Australian Demographic Statistics, Sept 2007 Canberra: ABS.

  • Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.

  • Clarke, D., Abbott, M., Tse, S., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2006). Gender, age, ethnic and occupational associations with pathological gambling in a New Zealand urban sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101(4), 570–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. (2000). Gender differences in Australian gambling: A critical summary of sociological and psychological research. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 35(2), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P., & Le Couteur, A. (2008). Australasian gambling review: Third edition (1992–2007). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and external determinants of persistent gambling: Problems in generalising from one form of gambling to another. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual factors in research and clinical interventions. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 5, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2001). Profiling lady luck: An empirical study of gambling and problem gambling amongst female club members. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 47–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1996). Casinos and bingo clubs: A consultation paper. London: UK Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C. (2005). The gambling environment and gambler behaviour: Evidence from Richmond-Tweed, Australia. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (2000). The makings of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In K. S. Rosengren, C. N. Johnson, & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M. P. M. T., & Silva, M. T. A. (2001). A comparison of horse-race, bingo, and video poker gamblers in Brazilian gambling settings. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 137–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries: Inquiry report No. 10. Melbourne: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, G. (1999). The age of chance: Gambling in western culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A. (2003). Has there been a “feminization” of gambling and problem gambling in the United States? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 8, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. E. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(4), 250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Wray, M. (2007). Legal gambling and problem gambling as mechanisms of social domination? Some considerations for future research. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 56–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. B. (1992). Irrational thinking among slot machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(3), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S: Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviours, 29(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1388–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J. A., Young, M. M., & Hart, K. E. (2005). Untreated young gamblers with game-specific problems: Self-concept involving luck, gambling ecology and delay in seeking professional treatment. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(5), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A., Brown, K., Crawford, M., & Pickernell, D. (2007). Gambling participation in Australia: Findings from the national Household Expenditure Survey. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(2), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Abu-Duhou, I., Barnes, T., Creed, E., Morris, M., Stevens, M., et al. (2006). Northern territory gambling prevalence survey 2005. Darwin: School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Stevens, M. (2009). Player preferences and social harm: An analysis of the relationships between player characteristics, gambling modes, and problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Stevens, M., & Morris, M. (2008a). Problem gambling within the non-indigenous population of the Northern Territory of Australia: A multivariate analysis of risk factors. International Gambling Studies, 8(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Stevens, M., & Tyler, W. (2008b). Northern territory 2005 gambling prevalence survey: An extended analysis. Darwin: School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Tyler, W. (2008). Mediating markets: Gambling venues, communities and social harm. Gambling Research, 20(1), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Community Benefit Fund of the Northern Territory Government, Australia, for funding the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Stevens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, M., Young, M. Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling. J Gambl Stud 26, 89–103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9143-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9143-y

Keywords

Navigation