Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in the tear film and ocular surface after cataract surgery

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate changes in corneal sensitivity, tear film function, and ocular surface stability in patients after cataract surgery.

Methods

This hospital-based prospective randomized trial included 48 eyes from 30 patients who underwent phacoemulsification. Slit-lamp examination, Schirmer test 1 (ST1), and measurement of corneal sensitivity and tear film breakup time (BUT) were performed for all patients 1 day before and 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. In addition, conjunctival impression cytology from the temporal region of the conjunctiva was simultaneously performed.

Results

Corneal sensitivity at the center and temporal incision sites had decreased significantly at 1 day postoperatively (P = .021, P < .001). However, the sensitivity had returned to almost the preoperative level 1 month postoperatively. The mean postoperative ST1 results were no different from preoperative values. On the other hand, BUT results had decreased significantly at 1 day postoperatively (P = .01) but had returned to almost the preoperative level 1 month postoperatively. Mean goblet cell density (GCD) had decreased significantly at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (P < .001). In addition, decrease in GCD and cataract operative time were highly correlated (r 2 = 0.65).

Conclusions

The decrease in GCD, which was correlated with operative time, had not recovered at 3 months after cataract surgery. Therefore, microscopic ocular surface damage during cataract surgery seems to be one of the pathogenic factors that cause ocular discomfort and dry eye syndrome after cataract surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apostol S, Filip M, Dragne C, Filip A. Dry eye syndrome: etiological and therapeutic aspects. Oftalmologia. 2003;59:28–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheppard JD. Guidelines for the treatment of chronic dry eye disease. Manag Care. 2003;12:20–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, Wang W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea. 2007;26:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols K, Mitchell GL, Chalmers R. Results of a dry eye questionnaire from optometric practices in North America. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:1009–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albietz JM, Lenton LM. Management of the ocular surface and tear film before, during, and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:62–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanal S, Tomlinson A, Esakowitz L, Bhatt P, Jones D, Nabili S, et al. Changes in corneal sensitivity and tear physiology after phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu KP, Yagi Y, Tsubota K. Decrease in corneal sensitivity and change in tear function in dry eye. Cornea. 1996;15:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anshu, Munshi MM, Sathe V, Ganar A. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Cytopathology. 2001;12:314–20.

  10. Reddy V, Rao V, Arunjyothi, Reddy M. Conjunctival impression cytology for assessment of vitamin A status. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:814–7.

  11. Pisella PJ, Debbasch C, Hamard P, Creuzot-Garcher C, Rat P, Brignole F, et al. Conjunctival proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol: an ex vivo and in vitro study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lievens CW, Connor CG, Murphy H. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:241–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tseng SC. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:728–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohlhaas M, Stahlhut O, Tholuck J, Richard G. Development of corneal sensitivity after phacoemulsification with scleral tunnel incision. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997;211:32–6 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ram J, Gupta A, Brar G, Kaushik S. Outcomes of phacoemulsification in patients with dry eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1386–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. New phacoemulsification technology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Komai-Hori Y, Tsubota K. Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Harazi SM, Feldman RM. Control of intra-ocular inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chee SP, Ti SE, Sivakumar M, Tan DT. Postoperative inflammation: extracapsular cataract extraction versus phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1280–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009;23:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, #62 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-713, Korea

    Taehoon Oh, Younhea Jung, Dongjin Chang, Jaeryun Kim & Hyunseung Kim

Authors
  1. Taehoon Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Younhea Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dongjin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jaeryun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyunseung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunseung Kim.

About this article

Cite this article

Oh, T., Jung, Y., Chang, D. et al. Changes in the tear film and ocular surface after cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 56, 113–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0117-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0117-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation