Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds for Pach’s Selection Theorem and for the Minimum Solid Angle in a Simplex

  • Published:
Discrete & Computational Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We estimate the selection constant in the following geometric selection theorem by Pach: For every positive integer d, there is a constant \(c_d > 0\) such that whenever \(X_1, \ldots , X_{d+1}\) are n-element subsets of \(\mathbb {R}^d\), we can find a point \({\mathbf {p}}\in \mathbb {R}^d\) and subsets \(Y_i \subseteq X_i\) for every \(i \in [d+1]\), each of size at least \(c_d n\), such that \({\mathbf {p}}\) belongs to all rainbow d-simplices determined by \(Y_1, \ldots , Y_{d+1}\), i.e., simplices with one vertex in each \(Y_i\). We show a super-exponentially decreasing upper bound \(c_d\le e^{-(1/2-o(1))(d \ln d)}\). The ideas used in the proof of the upper bound also help us to prove Pach’s theorem with \(c_d \ge 2^{-2^{d^2 + O(d)}}\), which is a lower bound doubly exponentially decreasing in d (up to some polynomial in the exponent). For comparison, Pach’s original approach yields a triply exponentially decreasing lower bound. On the other hand, Fox, Pach, and Suk recently obtained a hypergraph density result implying a proof of Pach’s theorem with \(c_d \ge 2^{-O(d^2\log d)}\). In our construction for the upper bound, we use the fact that the minimum solid angle of every d-simplex is super-exponentially small. This fact was previously unknown and might be of independent interest. For the lower bound, we improve the ‘separation’ part of the argument by showing that in one of the key steps only \(d+1\) separations are necessary, compared to \(2^d\) separations in the original proof. We also provide a measure version of Pach’s theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although we are interested in the dependence of \(c^{\sup }_d\) on d, we call it a constant emphasizing its independence on the size of the sets \(X_i\).

References

  1. Akopyan, A., Karasev, R.: Bounding minimal solid angles of polytopes. Preprint; arXiv:1505.05263v1 (2015)

  2. Alexandroff, A.D.: Additive set-functions in abstract spaces. Mat. Sb., Nov. Ser. 13(55), 169–238 (1943)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bárány, I.: A generalization of Carathéodory’s theorem. Discrete Math. 40, 141–152 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bárány, I., Pach, J.: Homogeneous selections from hyperplanes. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 104, 81–87 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bogachev, V.I.: Measure Theory, vol. II. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Boros, E., Füredi, Z.: The number of triangles covering the center of an \(n\)-set. Geom. Dedicata 17(1), 69–77 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, J., Gromov, M., Lafforgue, V., Naor, A., Pach, J.: Overlap properties of geometric expanders. J. Reine Angew. Math. 671, 49–83 (2012)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, J., Pach, J., Suk, A.: A polynomial regularity lemma for semi-algebraic hypergraphs and its applications in geometry and property testing. Preprint; arXiv:1502.01730v1 (2015)

  9. Gao, F., Hug, D., Schneider, R.: Intrinsic volumes and polar sets in spherical space. Math. Notae 41, 159–176 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gromov, M.: Singularities, expanders and topology of maps. Part 2: From combinatorics to topology via algebraic isoperimetry. Geom. Funct. Anal. 20(2), 416–526 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, Z.: A slight improvement to the colored Bárány’s theorem. Electron. J. Comb. 21(4), p-4–39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kallus, Y.: Which values can attain the minimum solid angle in a simplex. MathOverflow, http://mathoverflow.net/questions/136313#comment351368_136313 (2013). Comment on a question of M. Tancer

  13. Karasev, R.: A simpler proof of the Boros–Füredi–Bárány–Pach–Gromov theorem. Discrete Comput. Geom. 47(3), 492–495 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Král’, D., Mach, L., Sereni, J.S.: A new lower bound based on Gromov’s method of selecting heavily covered points. Discrete Comput. Geom. 48(2), 487–498 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kynčl, J., Paták, P., Safernová, Z., Tancer, M.: Bounds for Pach’s selection theorem and for the minimum solid angle in a simplex. Preprint; arXiv:1403.8147v2 (2014)

  16. Matoušek, J., Wagner, U.: On Gromov’s method of selecting heavily covered points. Discrete Comput. Geom. 52(1), 1–33 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Matoušek, J.: Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Springer, New York (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Matoušek, J.: Using the Borsuk–Ulam Theorem. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Rourke, J.: Angle of a regular simplex. MathOverflow, http://mathoverflow.net/a/53881/24076 (2011). Answer to a question of B. Bukh

  20. Pach, J.: A Tverberg-type result on multicolored simplices. Comput. Geom. 10, 71–76 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Räcke, H.: Measure Concentration for the Sphere. Lecture Notes, http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/~harry/teaching/pdf/lecture13 (2006)

  22. Rogers, C.A.: An asymptotic expansion for certain Schläfli functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 36, 78–80 (1961)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao, T.: An Epsilon of Room, I: Real Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 117. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zong, C.: Sphere Packings. Universitext. Springer, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Erik Aas for participating at the initial stage of this project. We also thank Karim Adiprasito for fruitful discussions about the minimum solid angle in a simplex and Andrew Suk for a brief discussion on the expected improved lower bound by Fox, Pach, and Suk. R. K. was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant 15-31-20403 (mol_a_ved) and grant 15-01-99563. J. K., Z. P., and M. T. were partially supported by ERC Advanced Research Grant No. 267165 (DISCONV) and by the project CE-ITI (GAČR P202/12/G061) of the Czech Science Foundation. J. K. was also partially supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 200021-137574 and 200020-14453. P. P., Z. P., and M. T. were partially supported by the Charles University Grant GAUK 421511. P. P. was also partially supported by the Charles University Grant SVV-2014-260107. Z. P. was also partially supported by the Charles University Grant SVV-2014-260103. Part of this work was done when M. T. was affiliated with Institutionen för matematik, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, 100 44 Stockholm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Kynčl.

Additional information

Editor in Charge: János Pach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karasev, R., Kynčl, J., Paták, P. et al. Bounds for Pach’s Selection Theorem and for the Minimum Solid Angle in a Simplex. Discrete Comput Geom 54, 610–636 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-015-9720-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-015-9720-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation