Abstract
In order to investigate whether adaptive observations can improve tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts, observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) were conducted for 20 TC cases originating in the western North Pacific during the 2010 season according to the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) sensitivity, using the fifth version of the PSU/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5) and its 3DVAR assimilation system. A new intensity index was defined as the sum of the number of grid points within an allocated square centered at the corresponding forecast TC central position, that satisfy constraints associated with the Sea Level Pressure (SLP), near-surface horizontal wind speed, and accumulated convective precipitation. The higher the index value is, the more intense the TC is.
The impacts of the CNOP sensitivity on the intensity forecast were then estimated. The OSSE results showed that for 15 of the 20 cases there were improvements, with reductions of forecast errors in the range of 0.12%–8.59%, which were much less than in track forecasts. The indication, therefore, is that the CNOP sensitivity has a generally positive effect on TC intensity forecasts, but only to a certain degree. We conclude that factors such as the use of a coupled model, or better initialization of the TC vortex, are more important for an accurate TC intensity forecast.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberson, S. D., 2002: Two years of operational hurricane synoptic surveillance. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1101–1110.
Aberson, S. D., 2003: Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1613–1628.
Chen, B. Y., and M. Mu, 2012: The roles of spatial locations and patterns of initial errors in the uncertainties of tropical cyclone forecasts. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29(1), 63–78, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0201-x.
Chen, B. Y., M. Mu, and X. H. Qin, 2013: The impact of assimilating dropwindsonde data deployed at different sites on typhoon track forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2669–2682.
Chou, K. H., C. C. Wu, P. H. Lin, S. D. Aberson, M. Weissmann, F. Harnisch, and T. Nakazawa, 2011: The impact of dropwindsonde observations on typhoon track forecasts in DOTSTAR and T-PARC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1728–1743.
Duan, W. S., M. Mu, and B. Wang, 2004: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations as the optimal precursors for El Nino-Southern oscillation events. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23105, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004756.
Duan, W. S., F. Xue, and M. Mu, 2009: Investigating a nonlinear characteristic of El Niño events by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Atmos. Res., 94, 10–18.
Duan, W. S., and H. Y. Luo, 2010: A new strategy for solving a class of constrained nonlinear optimization problems related to weather and climate predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 741–749, doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-9141-0.
Elsberry, R. L., and P. A., Harr, 2008: Tropical cyclone structure (TCS08) field experiment science basis, observational platforms, and strategy. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 209–231.
Franklin, J. L., 2009: 2008 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. [Available online at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification]
Jiang, Z. N., and D. H. Wang, 2010: A study on precursors to blocking anomalies in climatological flows by using conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1170–1180.
Jiang, Z. N., and D. H. Wang, 2011: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations: Behaviour during the evolution of cold vortices over northeast China. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 198–208.
Jiang, Z. N., M. Mu, and D. H. Wang, 2011: Optimal perturbations triggering weather regime transitions: Onset of blocking and strong zonal flow. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(1), 59–68, doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9097-0.
Lin, I. I., C. C. Wu, I. F. Pun, and D. S. Ko, 2007: Upper-ocean thermal structure and theWestern North Pacific category 5 typhoons. Part I: Ocean features and the category 5 typhoons’ intensification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3288–3306.
Lin, I. I., I. F. Pun, and C. C. Wu, 2008: Upper-ocean thermal structure and the Western North Pacific category 5 typhoons. Part II: Dependence on translation speed. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3744–3757.
Mu, M., and Z. Y. Zhang, 2006: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations of a two-dimensional quasigeostrophic model. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1587–1604.
Mu, M., and Z. N. Jiang, 2011: Similarities between optimal precursors that trigger the onset of blocking events and optimally growing initial errors in onset prediction. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2860–2877, doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-037.1.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 10, 493–501.
Mu, M., L. Sun, and H. A. Dijkstra, 2004: The sensitivity and stability of the ocean’s thermohaline circulation to finite-Amplitude perturbations. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 2305–2315.
Mu, M., Duan, W. S., and Wang, B., 2007: Season-dependent dynamics of nonlinear optimal error growth and ENSO predictability in a theoretical model. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10113, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006981.
Mu, M., F. F. Zhou, and H. L. Wang, 2009: A method for identifying the sensitive areas in targeted observations for tropical cyclone prediction: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1623–1639.
Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653.
Peng, M. S., and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone forecasts as revealed by singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2508–2528.
Qin, X. H., and M. Mu, 2011a: A study on the reduction of forecast error variance by three adaptive observation approaches for tropical cyclone prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2218–2232.
Qin, X. H., and M. Mu, 2011b: Influence of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations sensitivity on typhoon track forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 185–197.
Qin, X. H., W. S. Duan, and M. Mu, 2013: Conditions under which CNOP sensitivity is valid for tropical cyclone adaptive observations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1544–1554.
Sun, G. D., and M. Mu, 2009: Nonlinear feature of the abrupt transitions between multiple equilibria states of an ecosystem model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26(2), 293–304, doi: 10.1007/s00376-009-0293-8.
Sun, G. D., and M. Mu, 2011: Response of a grassland ecosystem to climate change in a theoretical model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(6), 1266–1278, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0169-6.
Sun, G. D., and M. Mu, 2012: Inducing unstable grassland equilibrium states due to nonlinear optimal patterns of initial and parameter perturbations: Theoretical models. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29(1), 79–90, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0226-1.
Sun, L., M. Mu, D. J. Sun, and X. Y. Yin, 2005: Passive mechanism of decadal variation of thermohaline circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 110, C07025, doi: 10.1029/2005JC002897.
Sun, G. D., M. Mu, and Y. L. Zhang, 2010: Algorithm studies on how to obtain a conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27(6), 1311–1321, doi: 10.1007/s00376-010-9088-1.
Wang, B., and X. W. Tan, 2009: A fast algorithm for solving CNOP and associated target observation tests. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 23(4), 387–402.
Wang, H. L., M. Mu, and X. Y. Huang, 2011: Application of conditional non-linear optimal perturbations to tropical cyclone adaptive observation using the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model. Tellus, 63, 939–957.
Wang, Y. Q., and H. J. Cheng, 2008: A numerical investigation of the eyewall evolution in a Landfalling typhoon. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 21–40.
Weng, Y. H., and F. Q. Zhang, 2012: Assimilating airborne doppler radar observations with an ensemble kalman filter for convection-permitting hurricane initialization and prediction: Katrina (2005). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 841–859.
Wu, C. C., and Coauthors, 2005: Dropwindsonde observations for typhoon surveillance near the Taiwan region (DOSTAR): An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 787–790.
Wu, C. C., K. H. Chou, P. H. Lin, S. D. Aberson, M. S. Peng, and T. Nakazawa, 2007: The impact of dropwindsonde data on typhoon track forecasts in DOTSTAR. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 1157–1176.
Wu, C. C., Y. H. Huang, and G. Y. Lien, 2011: Concentric eyewall formation in typhoon Sinlaku (2008). Part I: Assimilation of T-PARC data based on the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 506–527.
Xu, J., and Y. Q., Wang, 2010: Sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone inner-core size to the initial vortex size. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 4135–4157.
Yu, Y. S., W. S. Duan, H. Xu, and M. Mu, 2009: Dynamics of nonlinear error growth and season-dependent predictability of El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 2146–2160.
Yu, Y. S., M. Mu, and W. S. Duan, 2012a: Does model parameter error cause a significant “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in the Zebiak-Cane model? J. Climate, 25(4), 1263–1277.
Yu, Y. S., M. Mu, W. S. Duan, and T. T. Gong, 2012b: Contribution of the location and spatial pattern of initial error to uncertainties in El Niño predictions. J. Geophys. Res., 117, doi: 10.1029/2011JC007758.
Zeng, Z. H., Y. Q. Wang, and C. C. Wu, 2006: Environmental dynamical control of tropical cyclone intensity—An observational study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 38–59.
Zhou, F. F., and M. Mu, 2011: The impact of verification area design on tropical cyclone targeted observations based on the CNOP method. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(5), 997–1010, doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-1003-x.
Zhou, F. F., and M. Mu, 2012a: The impact of horizontal resolution on the CNOP and on its identified sensitive areas for tropical cyclone predictions. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29(1), 36–46, doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-1174-0.
Zhou, F. F., and M. Mu, 2012b: The time and regime dependencies of sensitive areas for tropical cyclone prediction using the CNOP method. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29(4), 705–716, doi: 10.1175/MWR3278.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, X., Mu, M. Can adaptive observations improve tropical cyclone intensity forecasts?. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 31, 252–262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-3008-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-3008-0