Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of verification area design on tropical cyclone targeted observations based on the CNOP method

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of different verification-area designs on the sensitive areas identified using the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method for tropical cyclone targeted observations. The sensitive areas identified using the first singular vector (FSV) method, which is the linear approximation of CNOP, were also investigated for comparison. By analyzing the validity of the sensitive areas, the proper design of a verification area was developed.

Tropical cyclone Rananim, which occurred in August 2004 in the northwest Pacific Ocean, was studied. Two sets of verification areas were designed; one changed position, and the other changed both size and position. The CNOP and its identified sensitive areas were found to be less sensitive to small variations of the verification areas than those of the FSV and its sensitive areas. With larger variations of the verification area, the CNOP and the FSV as well as their identified sensitive areas changed substantially. In terms of reducing forecast errors in the verification area, the CNOP-identified sensitive areas were more beneficial than those identified using FSV. The design of the verification area is important for cyclone prediction. The verification area should be designed with a proper size according to the possible locations of the cyclone obtained from the ensemble forecast results. In addition, the development trend of the cyclone analyzed from its dynamic mechanisms was another reference. When the general position of the verification area was determined, a small variation in size or position had little influence on the results of CNOP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberson, S. D., 2003: Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1613–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancell, B. C., and C. F. Mass, 2006: Structure, growth rates, and tangent linear accuracy of adjoint sensitivities with respect to horizontal and vertical resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2971–2988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M. A., R. J. Ross, R. E. Tuleya, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Improvements in tropical cyclone track and intensity forecasts using the GFDL initialization system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2046–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergot, T., 1999: Adaptive observations during FASTEX: A systematic survey of upstream flights. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3271–3298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birgin, E. G., J. E. Martinez, and R. Marcos, 2001: Algorithm 813: SPG-software for convex-constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 27, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1748–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2006: Verification region selection and data assimilation for adaptive sampling. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1434–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., and A. Montani, 1999: Targeting observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2965–2985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J. N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of targeted observations Part II: The value of observations taken in singular vectors-based target areas. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1817–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbosiero, K. L., and J. Molinari, 2003: The relationship between storm motion, vertical wind shear, and convective asymmetries in tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W. S., and M. Mu, 2009: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation: Applications to stability, sensitivity, and predictability. Science in China (D), 52, 884–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W. S., and R. Zhang, 2010: Is model parameter error related to a significant spring predictability barrier for El Nino events? Results from a theoretical model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1003–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, M., and R. M. Errico, 1995: Mesoscale predictability and the spectrum of optimal perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3475–3500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. L., and M. DeMaria, 1992: The impact of Omega dropwindsonde observations on barotropic hurricane track forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froude, L. S. R., L. Bengtsson, and K. I. Hodges, 2007: The predictability of extratropical storm tracks and the sensitivity of their prediction to the observing system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelaro, R., R. H. Langland, G. C. Rohaly, and T. E. Rosmond, 1999: An assessment of the singular-vector approach to targeted observations using the FASTEX dataset. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3299–3327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly, A., and Coauthors, 1997: The Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiments (FASTEX): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 1917–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langland, R. H., 2005: Issues in targeted observing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3409–3425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langland, R. H., and Coauthors, 1999: The North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX-98): Targeted observations for improved North American weather forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1363–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., and Z. N. Jiang, 2008: A new method to generate the initial perturbations in ensemble forecast: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53, 2062–2068S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 10, 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2007: Seasondependent dynamics of nonlinear optimal error growth and ENSO predictability in a theoretical model. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, M., F. F. Zhou, and H. L. Wang, 2009: A method to identify the sensitive areas in targeting for tropical cyclone prediction: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1623–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedlosky, J., 1986: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York Inc, 710pp.

  • Peng, Y., W. Duan, and J. Xiang, 2011: Effect of stochastic MJO forcing on ENSO predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., doi: 10.1007/s00376-011-0126-4.

  • Rabier, F., and Coauthors, 2008: An update on THORPEX-related research in data assimilation and observing strategies. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 15, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riehl, H., W. H. Haggard, and R. W. Sanborn, 1956: On the prediction of 24-hour hurricane motion. J. Meteor., 13, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivier, O., G. Lapeyre, and O. Talagrand, 2008: Nonlinear generalization of singular vectors: behavior in a baroclinic unstable flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1896–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C., 1996: Summary of an informal workshop on adaptive observations and FASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 953–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szunyogh, I., Z. Toth, R. E. Morss, S. J. Majumdar, B. J. Etherton, and C. H. Bishop, 2000: The effect of targeted dropsonde observations during the 1999 Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3520–3537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szunyogh, I., Z. Toth, A. V. Zimin, S. J. Majumdar, and A. Persson, 2002: Propagation of the effect of targeted observations: The 2000 Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1144–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tory, K. J., M. T. Montgomery, N. E. Davidson, and J. D. Kepert, 2006: Prediction and diagnosis of tropical cyclone formation in an NWP system. Part II: A diagnosis of tropical cyclone Chris formation. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3091–3113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., and X.W. Tan, 2009: A fast algorithm for solving CNOP and associated target observation tests. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 23, 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., and Coauthors, 2005: Dropwindsonde observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the Taiwan Region (DOSTAR): An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 787–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., J. H. Chen, P. H. Lin, and K. H. Chou, 2007: Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the Adjoint-Derived Sensitivity Steering Vector. J. Atmos Sci., 64, 2611–2626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y. H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-435-STR, 111pp.

  • Zhu, H., and A. Thorpe, 2006: Predictability of extratropical cyclones: The influence of initial condition and model uncertainties. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1483–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Severe Storms, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Feifan Zhou  (周菲凡)

  2. State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Mu Mu  (穆 穆)

Authors
  1. Feifan Zhou  (周菲凡)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mu Mu  (穆 穆)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feifan Zhou  (周菲凡).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Mu, M. The impact of verification area design on tropical cyclone targeted observations based on the CNOP method. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 28, 997–1010 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-011-0120-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-011-0120-x

Key words

Search

Navigation