Skip to main content
Log in

An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A positive glide is a common finding after ACL reconstructions, especially in women. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of Cocker-Arnold’s extra-articular procedure in reducing the incidence of a residual postoperative rotational knee laxity.

Methods

Sixty patients affected by an ACL injury with a +2 (clunk) or +3 (gross shift) pivot-shift test entered this prospective study; they were randomly assigned to group A (control group, hamstrings) or group B (study group, hamstrings plus Cocker-Arnold). Thirty-two patients entered group A and 28 group B. At follow-up, patients underwent clinical evaluation, KT-1000 arthrometer and Lysholm, Tegner, VAS and subjective and objective IKDC form.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 44.6 months, the same expert surgeon reviewed 55 patients (28 group A and 27 group B). The comparison of the results of the evaluation scales used and of the KT-1000 arthrometer did not show statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Lachman test was negative (S/S) in all the patients of both groups (100 %). A residual positive pivot-shift (glide) was found in 16 patients (57.1 %) of group A and in five patients (18.6 %) of group B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The extra-articular MacIntosh procedure modified by Cocker-Arnold in combination with ACL reconstruction significantly reduces the rotational instability of the knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noojin FK, Barrett GR, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2000) Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. AmJ Sports Med 28(6):783–789

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Besier TF, Lloyd DG, Cochrane JL, Ackland TR (2001) External loading of the knee joint during running and cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1168–1175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjordal JM, Arnly F, Hannestad B, Strand T (1997) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer. Am J Sports Med 25:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA Jr, Garrett WE Jr (2000) Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics 23:573–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrari JD, Bach BR Jr, Bush-Joseph CA, Wang T, Bojchuk J (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: an outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy 17:588–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferretti A, Papandrea P, Conteduca F, Mariani PP (1992) Knee ligament injuries in volleyball players. Am J Sports Med 20:203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toth AP, Cordasco FA (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete. J Gend Specif Med 4:25–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J et al (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a metaanalysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J (2004) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salmon LJ, Refshauge KM, Russell VJ, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2006) Gender differences in outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 34(4):621–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27(4):444–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2002) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 18:46–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill PF, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA (2005) The influence of supplementary tibial fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in female patients. Am J Sports Med 33(1):94–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavoie P, Fletcher J, Duval N (2001) Correlation between patients’ satisfaction and objective measurement of knee stability after ACL reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft. Knee 8:19–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roth JH, Kennedy JC, Lockstadt H et al (1987) Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without extra-articular supplementation by transfer of the biceps femoris tendon. J Bone Joint Surg 69(2):275–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strum GM, Fox JM, Ferkel RD et al (1989) Intraarticular versus intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction for chronic anterior cruciate ligament instability. Clin Orthop 245:188–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrett GR, Richardson KJ (1995) The effect of added extraarticular procedure on results of ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg Winter 8(1):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerat JL, Chotel F, Besse JL et al (1998) Les résultats après 10 à 16 ans du traitement de la laxité chronique antérieure du genou par une reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur avec une greffe de tendon rotulien associée à une plastie extra-articulaire externe. A propos de 138 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84(8):712–727

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noyes FR, Barber SD (1991) The effect of an extra-articular procedure on allograft reconstructions for chronic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(6):882–892

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M et al (2006) Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques. A clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1060–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torg J, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4:84–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1(3–4):226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Labianca L et al (2005) Evolgate fixation of doubled flexor graft in acl reconstruction: biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 33(4):574–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Morelli F et al (2003) The evolgate, a method to improve the pull-out strength of interference screw in tibial fixation of ACL reconstruction with DGST. Arthroscopy 19(9):936–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnold C, Van Bell C, Rogers V et al (2000) The relationship between serum relaxin and knee joint laxity in female athletes. Orthopedics 25:669–673

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bak K, Jorgensen U, Ekstrand J et al (1999) Results of reconstruction of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament with an iliotibial band autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:111–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Monaco E, Labianca L, Conteduca F et al (2007) Double bundle or single bundle plus extraarticular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? A CAOS study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(10):1168–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Gianluca Mastrantonio for the statistical analysis and Mrs. Angela Mitchell for the technical support in performing the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Pasquale Vadalà.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadalà, A.P., Iorio, R., De Carli, A. et al. An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 187–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1571-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1571-0

Keywords

Navigation