Skip to main content
Log in

Patients older than 55 years regain sporting and recreational activities after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

(1) To compare sporting and recreational activity levels before and at a minimum 6 year follow-up, and (2) to assess the clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients older than 55 years.

Methods

A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of 150 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 4.5 (57–74) years was evaluated 8.6 ± 1.4 (6–11) years after primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. All patients were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee scoring system (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The level of recreational activities was assessed using a sport-specific questionnaire. All patients were categorized according to Isolated and Combined ACL injury groups.

Results

The data of 125 patients were analyzed at the last follow-up. While 25 patients were lost to follow-up, 117 of 125 patients were active before their injury in at least one sports discipline compared to 121 of 125 patients after ACL reconstruction. One hundred and two (82%) patients had returned to their recreational activities at the final follow-up. The mean IKDC subjective score increased from 49.5 ± 23.2 (11.5–100) to 76.2 ± 14.8 (33.3–100) (p < 0.0001). The mean KOOS sport increased significantly from 36 ± 36.2 (0–100) to 74.1 ± 25.5 (0–100) (p < 0.0001). The mean VAS score improved from 6.0 ± 2.6 (0–10) to 1.0 ± 1.4 (0–6) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the median Tegner activity level (preoperative 5 (2–8) vs. follow-up 5 (2–8) (n.s). There was no significant difference in the number of sports disciplines and duration when comparing pre-injury and mid-term follow-up activity after ACL reconstruction. High-impact activities experienced a significant decline, while a significant increase in participation in low-impact activities was recorded.

Conclusion

The majority of patients with symptomatic instability regained their pre-injury recreational activity level with excellent clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, a change from high-to low-impact activities has been observed.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez-Diaz P, Alentorn-Geli E, Llobet F et al (2016) Return to play after all-inside meniscal repair in competitive football players a minimum 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(6):1997–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3285-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA et al (2013) Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1549–1558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513489284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Best MJ, Zikria BA, Wilckens JH (2021) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the older athlete. Sports Health 13(3):285–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738120953426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA et al (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries part I. Am J Sports Med 33(10):1579–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505279913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT et al (2011) Measures of knee function. international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (kOOS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (Koos-PS), knee outcome survey activities of daily living scale (KOS-ADL), lysholm knee scoring scale, oxford knee score (OKS), western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), activity rating scale (ARS), and tegner activity score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):208–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.206326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa GG, Grassi A, Perelli S et al (2019) Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(11):3679–3691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05450-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faleide AGH, Magnussen LH, Strand T et al (2021) The role of psychological readiness in return to sport assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 49(5):1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546521991924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farshad M, Gerber C, Meyer DC et al (2011) Reconstruction versus conservative treatment after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament cost effectiveness analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 11:317. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fayard J-M, Wein F, Ollivier M et al (2019) Factors affecting outcome of ACL reconstruction in over-50-year-olds. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(8S):S247–S251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Figueroa D, Figueroa F, Calvo R et al (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 50 years of age. Knee 21(6):1166–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fink C, Hoser C, Hackl W et al (2001) Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture–is sports activity a determining variable? Int J Sports Med 22(4):304–309. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-13823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iorio R, Iannotti F, Ponzo A et al (2018) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than fifty years a comparison with a younger age group. Int Orthop 42(5):1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3860-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS et al (1998) Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(8):1132–1145. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM (2003) Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain 4(7):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan Y (2011) Identifying individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee as copers and noncopers a narrative literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(10):758–766. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan Y, Witvrouw E (2019) When is it safe to return to sport after ACL reconstruction? Rev Criteria Sports Health 11(4):301–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738119846502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kay J, Memon M, Marx RG et al (2018) Over 90 % of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4830-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim K-T, Kim H-J, Lee H-I et al (2018) A comparison of results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in over 40 and under 40 years of age. A Meta-Analysis Knee Surg Relat Res 30(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.17.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kohn L, Rembeck E, Rauch A (2020) Verletzung des vorderen kreuzbandes beim erwachsenen diagnostik und therapie (anterior cruciate ligament injury in adults diagnostics and treatment). Orthopade 49(11):1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai CCH, Ardern CL, Feller JA et al (2018) Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates graft rupture rates and performance outcomes. Br J Sports Med 52(2):128–138. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mardani-Kivi M, Azari Z, Hasannejad F (2020) Return to sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a 6–10 years follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11(Suppl 3):S319–S325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meredith SJ, Rauer T, Chmielewski TL et al (2020) Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury panther symposium ACL Injury return to sport consensus group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(8):2403–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06009-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Monk AP, Davies LJ, Hopewell S et al (2016) Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011166. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011166.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A et al (2007) Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1688–1695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507303562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nicholls M, Ingvarsson T, Briem K (2021) Younger age increases the risk of sustaining multiple concomitant injuries with an ACL rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(8):2701–2708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06538-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ode Q, Gonzalez J-F, Paihle R et al (2019) Influence of operative technique on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 50 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(8S):S253–S258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortmaier R, Fink C, Schobersberger W et al (2021) Rückkehr zum Sport nach Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Eine Matched-paired-Studie nach Kreuzbandnaht mittels Internal Brace und Ersatzplastik mittels Hamstring- oder Quadrizepssehne (Return to Sports after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: a Matched-Pair Analysis of Repair with Internal Brace and Reconstruction Using Hamstring or Quadriceps Tendons). Sportverletz Sportschaden 35(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1019-0949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ovigue J, Bouguennec N, Graveleau N (2020) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a reliable option to treat knee instability in patients over 50 years old. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(11):3686–3693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06254-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Panisset J-C, Gonzalez J-F, de Lavigne C et al (2019) ACL reconstruction in over 50 year olds comparative study between prospective series of over 50 year old and under 40 year old patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(8S):259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paterno MV (2017) Non-operative care of the patient with an acl-deficient knee. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10(3):322–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9431-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patterson BE, Culvenor AG, Barton CJ et al (2020) Patient-reported outcomes one to five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction the effect of combined injury and associations with osteoarthritis features defined on magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Care Res 72(3):412–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Paulos LE, Wnorowski DC, Beck CL (1991) Rehabilitation following knee surgery. Recomm Sports Med 11(4):257–275. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199111040-00005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Salesky MA, Oeding JF, Zhang AL et al (2021) Patients aged 50 years and older have greater complication rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a large database study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3(6):1827–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sylvia SM, Gill TJ, Engler ID et al (2021) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft in patients aged 50 and older leads to improved activity levels and acceptable patient-reported outcomes. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3(6):e1961–e1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Toanen C, Demey G, Ntagiopoulos PG et al (2017) Is There any benefit in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 60 years? Am J Sports Med 45(4):832–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516678723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Totlis T, Haunschild ED, Otountzidis N et al (2021) Return-to-sport rate and activity level are high following arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A Syst Rev Arthrosc 37(7):2351–2360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Grinsven S, van Cingel REH, Holla CJM et al (2010) Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1128–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1027-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Webster KE, McPherson AL, Hewett TE et al (2019) Factors associated with a return to preinjury level of sport performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 47(11):2557–2562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519865537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wittenberg RH, Oxfort HU, Plafki C (1998) A comparison of conservative and delayed surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Matched Pair Anal Int Orthop 22(3):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yabroudi MA, Irrgang JJ (2013) Rehabilitation and return to play after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 32(1):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2012.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zimmerer A, Sobau C, Nietschke R et al (2018) Long-term outcome after all inside meniscal repair using the fast-fix system. J Orthop 15(2):602–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There has been no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PO and HJ carried out data collection. AZ and FZ participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. PB, CS and AE conceived the study, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Zimmerer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

F-2020-117, Ethics Committee Landesärztekammer Baden-Würtemberg, Germany.

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogunleye, P., Jäger, H., Zimmermann, F. et al. Patients older than 55 years regain sporting and recreational activities after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 632–640 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07116-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07116-x

Keywords

Navigation