Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle (A-SB group) versus double-bundle (A-DB group) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the hamstrings tendons. Twenty patients with unilateral ACL deficiency were randomised into two groups. We created the bone tunnels at the position of the original insertion of the anteromedial bundle footprint and posterolateral bundle footprint in the A-DB group and at the central position between these two bundles in the A-SB group. All of the patients were tested before ACL reconstruction and one year after surgery. The KT-1000 measurements, isokinetic muscle peak torque and heel-height difference were evaluated and the general knee condition was assessed by Lysholm score. For pre- and postoperative stability assessment, we used the six-degrees-of-freedom of knee kinematic measurement system using an electromagnetic device (the EMS) for quantitative assessment during the Lachman test and the pivot shift test. There were no significant differences in the KT-1000 measurements, isokinetic muscle peak torque, heel-height difference, and Lysholm score at one-year follow-up between these two groups. The EMS data showed there were significant differences in the acceleration of the pivot shift test between the operated knee and the contralateral normal knees in the A-SB group. In conclusion, clinical outcomes were equally good in both groups. However, the EMS data showed the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction tended to be biomechanically superior to the single-bundle reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen W, Tretow H, Weimann A, Herbort M, Fu FH, Raschke M, Zantop T (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of two techniques for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one tibial tunnel versus two tibial tunnels. Am J Sports Med 35:228–234. doi:10.1177/0363546506294468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morimoto Y, Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2009) Tibiofemoral joint contact area and pressure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:62–69. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107. doi:10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802ba45c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:223–227. doi:10.1177/0363546506294571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:907–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgoulis AD, Papadonikolakis A, Papageorgiou CD, Mitsou A, Stergiou N (2003) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med 31:75–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Sward L, Kartus J, Eriksson BI, Karrholm J (2002) Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med 30:361–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bush-Joseph CA, Hurwitz DE, Patel RR, Bahrani Y, Garretson R, Bach BR Jr, Andriacchi TP (2001) Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 29:36–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2003) The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:360–365. doi:10.1007/s00167-003-0428-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19:297–304. doi:10.1053/jars.2003.50084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N (2007) Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113. doi:10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802baaf4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 36:290–297. doi:10.1177/0363546507308360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:137–145. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH (2008) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 36:1414–1421. doi:10.1177/0363546508317964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu FH (2008) The clock-face reference: simple but nonanatomic. Arthroscopy 24:1433, author reply 1434. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen W, Forsythe B, Ingham SM, Honkamp NJ, Fu FH (2008) Application of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction concept to revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament surgeries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):20–34. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlegel TF, Boublik M, Hawkins RJ, Steadman JR (2002) Reliability of heel-height measurement for documenting knee extension deficits. Am J Sports Med 30:479–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yagi M, Mizuno K, Yamaguchi M, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35:1098–1104. doi:10.1177/0363546507299447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Araki D, Kuroda R, Murata H, Nagamune K, Nishimoto K, Hoshino Y, Kubo S, Kurosaka M (2008) Quantitative measurement of the Lachman test using an electromagnetic measurement system. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco

  27. Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Kurosaka M (2007) Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:54–58. doi:10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802b4a38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Seon JK, Song EK, Bae BH, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Cho SG, Lee JJ, Kim MS (2007) Kinematic study following double-bundle, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 31:623–628. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0244-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Yoon TR, Seo HY, Song EK (2009) Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions. Int Orthop 33:425–429. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0530-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Asagumo H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Taki M, Takagishi K (2007) Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using double-bundle hamstring tendons: surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy 23:602–609. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H (2008) Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:232–238. doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0480-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kasovic M, Mejovsek M, Matkovic B, Jankovic S, Tudor A (2010) Electromyographic analysis of the knee using fixed-activation threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1050-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Ms. Janina Tubby for her excellent editing assistance in preparing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

We did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of our research for or preparation of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryosuke Kuroda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araki, D., Kuroda, R., Kubo, S. et al. A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 439–446 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1110-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1110-9

Keywords

Navigation