Skip to main content
Log in

Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra-operative stability during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (20 knees) using a navigation system and compare the results with those obtained from single-bundle reconstructions (20 knees). After registering the reference points during ACL reconstruction, antero-posterior and rotational stability tests with 30° knee flexion using a navigation system were measured before and after reconstructions on both groups. The change of antero-posterior translation after and before reconstruction was 12.5 mm in the double-bundle group and 10.5 mm in the single-bundle group, showing significant inter-group difference (p=0.014, from 17.5 mm to 5.1 mm in the double-bundle and from 16.6 mm to 6.1 mm in the single-bundle group). The mean rotational stability of the double-bundle group also showed more significant improvement after reconstruction compared to that of the single-bundle group (9.8° in the double- and 5.6° in the single-bundle groups, p<0.001). These findings suggest that a double-bundle ACL reconstruction restores greater knee stability with respect to the antero-posterior and rotational stability than a single-bundle reconstruction.

Résumé

Le propos de cette étude est d’évaluer la stabilité per opératoire de la reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur par deux faisceaux à propos de 20 genoux avec utilisation d’un système de navigation. Ces résultats ont été comparés à ceux obtenus par une reconstruction par un seul faisceau (20 genoux). Après enregistrement des différents points de références, la stabilité des genoux est testée à 30° de flexion en utilisant le système de navigation avant et après la reconstruction dans les deux groupes. La modification de la translation antéro postérieure après et avant la reconstruction était de 12,5 mm dans le groupe à deux faisceaux et de 10,5 mm dans le groupe à un seul faisceau, montrant une différence significative (p=0,014, 17,5 mm à 5,1 mm dans les réfections avec deux faisceaux et de 16,6 mm à 6,1 mm dans les réfections à un seul faisceau). La stabilité en rotation a également été améliorée dans le groupe de reconstruction à deux faisceaux (9,8° contre 5,6° dans le groupe à un seul faisceau, p<0,001). Ces données confirment que la reconstruction des ligaments croisés antérieurs par la technique à deux faisceaux permet d’avoir un genou beaucoup plus stable tant sur le plan antéro postérieur que sur le plan rotatoire si l’on compare cette technique à celle de la reconstruction avec un seul faisceau.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellier G, Christel P, Colombet P, Djian P, Franceschi JP, Sbihi A (2004) Double-stranded hamstring graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20:890–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi JP, Djian P (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Degenhart M (2004) Computer-navigated ACL reconstruction with the OrthoPilot. Surg Technol Int 12:245–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dienst M, Burks RT, Greis PE (2002) Anatomy and biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Clin North Am 33:605–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Miyama T, Shiozaki Y, Mae T (2001) Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 17:801–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hara K, Kubo T, Suginoshita T, Shimizu C, Hirasawa Y (2000) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double bundle. Arthroscopy 16:860–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Tazawa K, Sato H, Toh S (2005) Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. Orthopedics 28(Suppl 10):1277–1282

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Rudy TW, Li G, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy 18:394–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF (1998) Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P, Johnson TR, Feagin JA (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:229–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H, Fujie H (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcacci M, Molgora AP, Zaffagnini S, Vascellari A, Iacono F, Presti ML (2003) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings. Arthroscopy 19:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2007) Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity. Comput Aided Surg 12:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moody JE, Nikou C, Picard F, Levison T, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM 3rd, Reverte CF (2002) Computer-integrated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(Suppl 2):99–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muneta T, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ogiuchi T, Yamamoto H, Shinomiya K (1999) Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with endobuttons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 15:618–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Muneta T, Koga H, Morito T, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2006) A retrospective study of the midterm outcome of two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled semitendinosus tendon in comparison with one-bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:252–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34:542–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2003) The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:360–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon: a cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:907–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y,Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, Imakiire N, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:811–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Kyoo Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seon, J.K., Park, S.J., Lee, K.B. et al. Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 425–429 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0530-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0530-2

Keywords

Navigation