Skip to main content
Log in

Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to introduce a modified anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using functional double bundles (F-DBACLR), which achieved sequential tensioning at all flexion angles postoperatively, and compare its clinical outcomes with the anatomical single-bundle technique (A-SBACLR).

Methods

A total of 156 patients with an ACL injury underwent ACLR (A-SB group, n = 78; F-DB group, n = 78). All operations were performed by anatomically identifying the ACL footprints and fixing the graft at a pre-determined degree of knee flexion. Two observers blinded to the patient identities examined the patients preoperatively and during follow-up (median 28.2 months; range 26–31 months). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluation tests and assessment of clinical outcomes concerning the translational and rotational stability of the knee including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, KT-1000 laxity measurements, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

Preoperatively, no differences were found between the two groups. During the 2-year observation period, patients in the F-DB group revealed better clinical outcomes in terms of the Tegner Activity Scale Score, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Similar results were shown in regard to the translational stability in both groups, while the F-DB group had more rotational stability at 2 years of follow-up.

Conclusions

The clinical outcomes indicated that F-DBACLR is clinically practicable and advantageous in the treatment of the ACL-deficient knee.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta R, Bahadur R, Malhotra A, Masih GD, Gupta P (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with preserved insertions. Arthrosc Tech 5:e269–e274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayr HO, Benecke P, Hoell A, Schmitt-Sody M, Bernstein A, Suedkamp NP et al (2016) Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 32:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J, Fu FH (2013) Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop 37:239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 33:1579–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjornsson H, Andernord D, Desai N, Norrby O, Forssblad M, Petzold M et al (2015) No difference in revision rates between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of 16,791 patients from the Swedish national knee ligament register. Arthroscopy 31:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2010) Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 38:1611–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karikis I, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J (2016) Comparison of anatomic double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts: a prospective randomized study with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Am J Sports Med 44:1225–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hantes ME, Tsarouhas A, Giakas G, Spiropoulos G, Sideris V, Christel P et al (2012) Effect of fatigue on tibial rotation after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2045–2051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26:258–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39:1789–1799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU, Fu FH (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu LL (2016) The correction between quadrupled hamstring tendon diameter and height, BMI, weight and gender [Master], Shanghai University of Sport

  14. Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40:1781–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Eck CF, Widhalm H, Murawski C, Fu FH (2015) Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Sportsmed 43:87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahlden M, Sernert N, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2013) A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2484–2491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2007) Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:189–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Desai N, Bjornsson H, Musahl V, Bhandari M, Petzold M, Fu FH et al (2014) Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1009–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu M, Gao S, Zeng C, Han R, Sun J, Li H et al (2013) Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle versus double-bundle technique: meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 29:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim SJ, Kim HK, Lee YT (1997) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon graft without detachment of the tibial insertion. Arthroscopy 13:656–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bush-Joseph C et al (2015) Does double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improve postoperative knee stability compared with single-bundle techniques? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 31:1185–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Woo SH, Seo HY, Lee KB (2013) Progression of osteoarthritis after double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2340–2346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun R, Chen BC, Wang F, Wang XF, Chen JQ (2015) Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1171–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu Y, Ao YF, Wang JQ, Cui GQ (2014) Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:308–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Neyret P, Richmond JC et al (2006) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 34:1567–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrissey MC, Hooper DM, Drechsler WI, Hill HJ (2004) Relationship of leg muscle strength and knee function in the early period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:360–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Papachristou G, Nikolaou V, Efstathopoulos N, Sourlas J, Lazarettos J, Frangia K et al (2007) ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon autograft without detachment of its tibial insertion: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1175–1180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ruffilli A, Traina F, Evangelisti G, Borghi R, Perna F, Faldini C (2015) Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature. Musculoskelet Surg 99:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1941) Summer courses in applied mechanics at Brown University. Science 93:562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Petersen W, Tillmann B (2002) Anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopade 31:710–718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bach JM, Hull ML, Patterson HA (1997) Direct measurement of strain in the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 30:281–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Arneja S, McConkey MO, Mulpuri K, Chin P, Gilbart MK, Regan WD et al (2009) Graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maharjan R, Costi JJ, Stanley RM, Martin D, Hearn TC, Field JR (2011) The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res 6:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mae T, Shino K, Nakata K, Toritsuka Y, Otsubo H, Fujie H (2008) Optimization of graft fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: effect of initial tension. Am J Sports Med 36:1087–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gertel TH, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Stewart NJ, Hunter RE (1993) Effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning direction, magnitude, and flexion angle on knee biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 21:572–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by Beijing Nova Program (Z161100004916137).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiang Zhang or Yan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This study received ethics approval from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the reference number (2013/136).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Yang, Y., Li, J. et al. Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 3471–3480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w

Keywords

Navigation