Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to introduce a modified anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using functional double bundles (F-DBACLR), which achieved sequential tensioning at all flexion angles postoperatively, and compare its clinical outcomes with the anatomical single-bundle technique (A-SBACLR).
Methods
A total of 156 patients with an ACL injury underwent ACLR (A-SB group, n = 78; F-DB group, n = 78). All operations were performed by anatomically identifying the ACL footprints and fixing the graft at a pre-determined degree of knee flexion. Two observers blinded to the patient identities examined the patients preoperatively and during follow-up (median 28.2 months; range 26–31 months). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluation tests and assessment of clinical outcomes concerning the translational and rotational stability of the knee including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, KT-1000 laxity measurements, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.
Results
Preoperatively, no differences were found between the two groups. During the 2-year observation period, patients in the F-DB group revealed better clinical outcomes in terms of the Tegner Activity Scale Score, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Similar results were shown in regard to the translational stability in both groups, while the F-DB group had more rotational stability at 2 years of follow-up.
Conclusions
The clinical outcomes indicated that F-DBACLR is clinically practicable and advantageous in the treatment of the ACL-deficient knee.
Level of evidence
II.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gupta R, Bahadur R, Malhotra A, Masih GD, Gupta P (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with preserved insertions. Arthrosc Tech 5:e269–e274
Mayr HO, Benecke P, Hoell A, Schmitt-Sody M, Bernstein A, Suedkamp NP et al (2016) Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 32:34–42
Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J, Fu FH (2013) Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop 37:239–246
Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 33:1579–1602
Bjornsson H, Andernord D, Desai N, Norrby O, Forssblad M, Petzold M et al (2015) No difference in revision rates between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of 16,791 patients from the Swedish national knee ligament register. Arthroscopy 31:659–664
Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234
Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2010) Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 38:1611–1617
Karikis I, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J (2016) Comparison of anatomic double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts: a prospective randomized study with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Am J Sports Med 44:1225–1236
Hantes ME, Tsarouhas A, Giakas G, Spiropoulos G, Sideris V, Christel P et al (2012) Effect of fatigue on tibial rotation after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional kinematic and kinetic matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2045–2051
van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26:258–268
Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39:1789–1799
Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU, Fu FH (2007) Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:87–96
Xu LL (2016) The correction between quadrupled hamstring tendon diameter and height, BMI, weight and gender [Master], Shanghai University of Sport
Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284
Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40:1781–1788
van Eck CF, Widhalm H, Murawski C, Fu FH (2015) Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Sportsmed 43:87–92
Ahlden M, Sernert N, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2013) A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2484–2491
Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2007) Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:189–196
Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:66–73
Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:907–914
Desai N, Bjornsson H, Musahl V, Bhandari M, Petzold M, Fu FH et al (2014) Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1009–1023
Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520
Xu M, Gao S, Zeng C, Han R, Sun J, Li H et al (2013) Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle versus double-bundle technique: meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 29:357–365
Kim SJ, Kim HK, Lee YT (1997) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon graft without detachment of the tibial insertion. Arthroscopy 13:656–660
Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bush-Joseph C et al (2015) Does double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improve postoperative knee stability compared with single-bundle techniques? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 31:1185–1196
Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Woo SH, Seo HY, Lee KB (2013) Progression of osteoarthritis after double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2340–2346
Sun R, Chen BC, Wang F, Wang XF, Chen JQ (2015) Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1171–1178
Xu Y, Ao YF, Wang JQ, Cui GQ (2014) Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:308–316
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Neyret P, Richmond JC et al (2006) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 34:1567–1573
Morrissey MC, Hooper DM, Drechsler WI, Hill HJ (2004) Relationship of leg muscle strength and knee function in the early period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:360–366
Papachristou G, Nikolaou V, Efstathopoulos N, Sourlas J, Lazarettos J, Frangia K et al (2007) ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon autograft without detachment of its tibial insertion: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1175–1180
Ruffilli A, Traina F, Evangelisti G, Borghi R, Perna F, Faldini C (2015) Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature. Musculoskelet Surg 99:87–92
Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:223–227
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1941) Summer courses in applied mechanics at Brown University. Science 93:562
Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463
Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216–231
Petersen W, Tillmann B (2002) Anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopade 31:710–718
Bach JM, Hull ML, Patterson HA (1997) Direct measurement of strain in the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 30:281–283
Arneja S, McConkey MO, Mulpuri K, Chin P, Gilbart MK, Regan WD et al (2009) Graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:200–207
Maharjan R, Costi JJ, Stanley RM, Martin D, Hearn TC, Field JR (2011) The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res 6:33
Mae T, Shino K, Nakata K, Toritsuka Y, Otsubo H, Fujie H (2008) Optimization of graft fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: effect of initial tension. Am J Sports Med 36:1087–1093
Gertel TH, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Stewart NJ, Hunter RE (1993) Effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning direction, magnitude, and flexion angle on knee biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 21:572–581
Funding
The study was supported by Beijing Nova Program (Z161100004916137).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.
Ethical approval
This study received ethics approval from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the reference number (2013/136).
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Q., Yang, Y., Li, J. et al. Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 3471–3480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w