Skip to main content
Log in

Gauged supergravities in 5 and 6 dimensions from generalised Scherk-Schwarz reductions

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that the Scherk-Schwarz reduction of M-theory in the Berman-Perry duality invariant formalism to 6 and 5 dimensions reproduces the known structures of gauged supergravities. The local symmetries defined by the generalised Lie derivative reduce to gauge transformations that exactly match those given by the embedding tensor of gauged supergravity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, N = 8 Supergravity with Local SO(8) × SU(8) Invariance, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 285 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Nicolai and H. Samtleben, Maximal gauged supergravity in three-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1686 [hep-th/0010076] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, The maximal D = 5 supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B 716 (2005) 215 [hep-th/0412173] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bergshoeff, H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin, The gaugings of maximal D = 6 supergravity, JHEP 03 (2008) 068 [arXiv:0712.4277] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. de Wit, H. Nicolai and H. Samtleben, Gauged supergravities, tensor hierarchies and M-theory, JHEP 02 (2008) 044 [arXiv:0801.1294] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Le Diffon and H. Samtleben, Supergravities without an action: gauging the trombone, Nucl. Phys. B 811 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0809.5180] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Samtleben, Lectures on gauged supergravity and flux compactifications, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 214002 [arXiv:0808.4076] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kumar and C. Vafa, U manifolds, Phys. Lett. B 396 (1997) 85 [hep-th/9611007] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Andriot, M. Larfors, D. Lüst and P. Patalong, A ten-dimensional action for non-geometric fluxes, JHEP 09 (2011) 134 [arXiv:1106.4015] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Chatzistavrakidis and L. Jonke, Matrix theory origins of non-geometric fluxes, JHEP 02 (2013) 040 [arXiv:1207.6412] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Dibitetto, J. Fernandez-Melgarejo, D. Marques and D. Roest, Duality orbits of non-geometric fluxes, Fortsch. Phys. 60 (2012) 1123 [arXiv:1203.6562] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Flournoy, B. Wecht and B. Williams, Constructing nongeometric vacua in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 706 (2005) 127 [hep-th/0404217] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Shelton, W. Taylor and B. Wecht, Nongeometric flux compactifications, JHEP 10 (2005) 085 [hep-th/0508133] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Hull and R. Reid-Edwards, Flux compactifications of string theory on twisted tori, Fortsch. Phys. 57 (2009) 862 [hep-th/0503114] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, Generalised T-duality and non-geometric backgrounds, JHEP 05 (2006) 009 [hep-th/0512005] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Hull and R. Reid-Edwards, Flux compactifications of M-theory on twisted Tori, JHEP 10 (2006) 086 [hep-th/0603094] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Wecht, Lectures on Nongeometric Flux Compactifications, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) S773 [arXiv:0708.3984] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Graña, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and D. Waldram, T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds, JHEP 04 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0807.4527] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Andriot, O. Hohm, M. Larfors, D. Lüst and P. Patalong, Non-geometric fluxes in supergravity and double field theory, Fortsch. Phys. 60 (2012) 1150 [arXiv:1204.1979] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Dibitetto, A. Guarino and D. Roest, Exceptional flux compactifications, JHEP 05 (2012) 056 [arXiv:1202.0770] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Hull, A Geometry for non-geometric string backgrounds, JHEP 10 (2005) 065 [hep-th/0406102] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C.M. Hull, Doubled geometry and T-folds, JHEP 07 (2007) 080 [hep-th/0605149] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory, JHEP 09 (2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Background independent action for double field theory, JHEP 07 (2010) 016 [arXiv:1003.5027] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Generalized metric formulation of double field theory, JHEP 08 (2010) 008 [arXiv:1006.4823] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Frame-like Geometry of Double Field Theory, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 085404 [arXiv:1011.4101] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, N = 1 supersymmetric double field theory, JHEP 03 (2012) 080 [arXiv:1111.7293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Hull, Generalised geometry for M-theory, JHEP 07 (2007) 079 [hep-th/0701203] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Graña, J. Louis, A. Sim and D. Waldram, E 7(7) formulation of N = 2 backgrounds, JHEP 07 (2009) 104 [arXiv:0904.2333] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Hillmann, Generalized E 7(7) coset dynamics and D = 11 supergravity, JHEP 03 (2009) 135 [arXiv:0901.1581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Aldazabal, E. Andres, P.G. Camara and M. Graña, U-dual fluxes and generalized geometry, JHEP 11 (2010) 083 [arXiv:1007.5509] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. D.S. Berman and M.J. Perry, Generalized geometry and M-theory, JHEP 06 (2011) 074 [arXiv:1008.1763] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, SO(5, 5) duality in M-theory and generalized geometry, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 65 [arXiv:1103.5733] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, The local symmetries of M-theory and their formulation in generalised geometry, JHEP 01 (2012) 012 [arXiv:1110.3930] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M.J. Perry and P. West, Duality invariant actions and generalised geometry, JHEP 02 (2012) 108 [arXiv:1111.0459] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D.S. Berman, E.T. Musaev and M.J. Perry, Boundary Terms in Generalized Geometry and doubled field theory, Phys. Lett. B 706 (2011) 228 [arXiv:1110.3097] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. F. Riccioni and P.C. West, E 11 -extended spacetime and gauged supergravities, JHEP 02 (2008) 039 [arXiv:0712.1795] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. P.P. Pacheco and D. Waldram, M-theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials, JHEP 09 (2008) 123 [arXiv:0804.1362] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Malek, U-duality in three and four dimensions, arXiv:1205.6403 [INSPIRE].

  40. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Differential geometry with a projection: application to double field theory, JHEP 04 (2011) 014 [arXiv:1011.1324] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Stringy differential geometry, beyond Riemann, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044022 [arXiv:1105.6294] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, Large gauge transformations in double field theory, JHEP 02 (2013) 075 [arXiv:1207.4198] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, On the Riemann tensor in double field theory, JHEP 05 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1112.5296] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, Towards an invariant geometry of double field theory, arXiv:1212.1736 [INSPIRE].

  45. N. Hitchin, Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 54 (2003) 281 [math/0209099] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. M. Gualtieri, Generalized complex geometry, math/0401221 [INSPIRE].

  47. N. Hitchin, Brackets, forms and invariant functionals, math/0508618 [INSPIRE].

  48. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry I: Type II theories, JHEP 11 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1107.1733] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry II: E d(d) × \( {{\mathbb{R}}^{+}} \) and M-theory, arXiv:1212.1586 [INSPIRE].

  50. I. Jeon, K. Lee, J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, Stringy Unification of Type IIA and IIB Supergravities under N = 2 D = 10 Supersymmetric Double Field Theory, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 245 [arXiv:1210.5078] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  51. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Ramond-Ramond cohomology and O(D, D) T-duality, JHEP 09 (2012) 079 [arXiv:1206.3478] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Supersymmetric Double Field Theory: Stringy Reformulation of Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 081501 [Erratum ibid. D 86 (2012) 089903] [arXiv:1112.0069] [INSPIRE].

  53. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Incorporation of fermions into double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 025 [arXiv:1109.2035] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. G. Aldazabal, W. Baron, D. Marques and C. Núñez, The effective action of double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 052 [Erratum ibid. 1111 (2011) 109] [arXiv:1109.0290] [INSPIRE].

  55. D. Geissbuhler, Double field theory and N = 4 gauged supergravity, JHEP 11 (2011) 116 [arXiv:1109.4280] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. M. Graña and D. Marques, Gauged double field theory, JHEP 04 (2012) 020 [arXiv:1201.2924] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. D.S. Berman, E.T. Musaev, D.C. Thompson and D.C. Thompson, Duality invariant M-theory: gauged supergravities and Scherk-Schwarz reductions, JHEP 10 (2012) 174 [arXiv:1208.0020] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. J. Scherk and J.H. Schwarz, How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 61 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, E d(d) × \( {{\mathbb{R}}^{+}} \) generalised geometry, connections and M-theory, arXiv:1112.3989 [INSPIRE].

  60. D.S. Berman, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt and D.C. Thompson, The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms, JHEP 01 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1208.5884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Tanii, N = 8 supergravity in six-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 145 (1984) 197 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. K. Peeters, A field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 550 [cs/0608005] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  63. K. Peeters, Introducing cadabra: a symbolic computer algebra system for field theory problems, hep-th/0701238 [INSPIRE].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edvard T. Musaev.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1301.0467

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musaev, E.T. Gauged supergravities in 5 and 6 dimensions from generalised Scherk-Schwarz reductions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 161 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)161

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)161

Keywords

Navigation