Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of pollen diversity on plant reproduction: insights from apple

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sexual Plant Reproduction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many plants, the number of pollen genotypes deposited on a flower’s stigma is positively related to fruit maturation and seed number; however, the mechanisms underlying this effect are less understood. Here we examined whether diversity of pollen (1, 3, or 5 donors) affects reproductive success in self-incompatible apple (Malus × domestica). Using paternity analysis, we then assessed the siring rate of individual donors to test whether diversity effects are related to the presence of a superior pollen donor or to donor × donor interactions. Increasing the diversity of compatible pollen enhanced seed number and reduced seed abortion in some but not all recipient genotypes. This effect was associated with an increased number of sires per fruit and non-random siring success among pollen donors. Two donors had consistently high siring rates, regardless of recipient genotype; however, the siring success of pollen donors was not correlated with their siring success in single-donor pollinations. Rather, siring success was affected by the identity of other pollen genotypes present on the stigma. Our results therefore suggest that the effects of pollen diversity are variable but may enhance fecundity by fostering interactions between pollen donors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Aronen T, Nikkanen T, Harju A, Tiimonen H, Häggman H (2002) Pollen competition and seed-siring success in Picea abies. Theor Appl Genet 104:638–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH (2003) Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Phil Trans Roy Soc Ser B 358:991–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Post RJ (1986) Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families. J Theor Biol 120:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1985) Nonrandom fruit production in Campsis radicans: between-year consistency and effects of prior pollination. Am Nat 126:750–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1986) Consequences of mixed pollinations in Campsis radicans. Oecologia 70:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI, Sullivan M (1988) Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. Am J Bot 75:1140–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F, Plantureux S (2005) Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agron Sust Dev 25:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall CS (1926) Apple breeding at the University of Illionis. Illinois Agric Exp Stn Bull 275:341–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale A, Elfing DC, Fisher KH, Miles NW, Tehrani G, Wilson KR (1992) Fruit cultivars: a guide to commercial growers. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers AM, Rieseberg LH (1998) Mentor effects in wild species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 85:770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (1994) Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution 48:952–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1986) Patterns of multiple paternity in populations of Raphanus sativus. Evolution 40:837–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Schnabel A (1985) Understanding the genetic structure of plant populations: some old problems and a new approach. In: Gregorius HR (ed) Population genetics in forestry. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Beaton MJ (1989) Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis: a practical handbook. Helena Laboratories, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband BC, Schemske DW, Burton TL, Goodwillie C (2002) Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proc Roy Soc London B 269:2565–2571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth CJ, Pellmyr O (2000) Pollen-mediated selective abortion in Yuccas and its consequences for the plant-pollinator mutualism. Ecology 81:1100–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1977) A note on optimal mate selection by plants. Am Nat 111:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kron P, Husband BC, Kevan P, Belaousoff S (2001a) Factors affecting pollen dispersal in high-density apple orchards. Hortscience 36:1039–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Kron P, Husband BC, Kevan P (2001b) Across- and along-row pollen dispersal in high-density apple orchards: insights from allozymes markers. J Hort Sci Biotech 76:286–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankinen A, Skogsmyr I (2002) Pollen competitive ability: the effect of proportion in two-donor crosses. Evol Ecol Res 4:687–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD (1984) Patterns of fruit maturation: a gametophyte competition hypothesis. Am Nat 123:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: experimental data on non-random fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. Am Nat 127:446–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher TR, Thompson E (1987) Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum (Liliaceae). Ecology 68:803–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesenbaum RA (1999) The effects of pollen load size and donor diversity on pollen performance, selective abortion, and progeny vigor in Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctaginaceae). Am J Bot 86:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesenbaum RA, Casper BB (1994) Pollen tube numbers and selective fruit maturation in Lindera benzoin. Am Nat 144:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paschke M, Abs C, Schmid B (2002) Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 89:1250–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson TE, Stephenson AG (1992) Effects of parentage and size of the pollen load on progeny performance in Campanula americana. Evolution 46:1731–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2002) JMP—The statistical discovery software, version 5.0. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Pautler L (1984) The effect of pollen composition on fitness components in a neotropical herb. Oecologia 62:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA (1990) Effects of pollen-load size and number of donors on sporophyte fitness. Am Nat 136:742–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Spira TP (1991) Pollen vigor and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Bertin RI (1983) Male competition, female choice and sexual selection in plants. In: Real L (ed) Pollination. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1987) Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: Experimental tests with Agave mckelveyana. Evolution 4:750–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Chen J, Fan J, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen J, Fan J, Yang S, Hu L, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng PS, Wang Z, Mundt CC (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406:718–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Van Diepen for permission to work in his orchard, T. Burton, S. Spender, C. Leduc, and J. Tindall for field and lab assistance, and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant, Premiers Research Excellence Awards and Canada Research Chair program for funding to BCH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian C. Husband.

Additional information

Communicated by Andrew Stephenson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kron, P., Husband, B.C. The effects of pollen diversity on plant reproduction: insights from apple. Sex Plant Reprod 19, 125–131 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-006-0028-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-006-0028-2

Keywords

Navigation