Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Xenia Effect: Differential Responses of Six Pollen Parents with Five Maternal Apple Cultivars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Applied Fruit Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the xenia effect while bearing in mind the significance of pollination and the pollen effect on xenia quality, a study was designed to determine the effect of the pollen grain of six pollen parents (‘Anna’, ‘Red Velox’, ‘Red Chief’, ‘Gala Redlum’, ‘Red Chief Camspur’, ‘Red Gold’) on five maternal parents (‘Pinova’, ‘Golden Clone-B’, ‘Granny Smith’, ‘Golden Delicious Reinders’, ‘Sunhari’) during 2021 using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Observations were recorded on fruit length (mm), fruit diameter (mm), fruit weight (g), seed number, and fruit firmness (kg/cm2). Other chemical characteristics such as total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and total sugars were also observed. Significant variations were observed for all the floral phenological traits among cultivars. Regarding the xenia affect, the pollen source significantly affected fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), fruit acidity, total sugars, and fruit weight and colour values in all cross combinations. Source of pollen also had positive and significant effects on the fruit qualitative characteristics of some varieties, especially ‘Granny Smith’ crossed with ‘Red Gold’, which recorded good size parameters, i.e., length (75.59 mm), diameter (82.04 mm), weight (224.52 g) and flesh firmness (9.53 kg/cm2). From the present study, it is concluded that the variety ‘Red Gold’ and ‘Gala Redlum’ was the best pollen source and exhibited maximum compatibility with most of the varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Raw data will be provided on the basis of request.

References

  • Anonymous (1990) Methods of analysis. Association of official agriculture chemists, Washington, D. C, p 957

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2020) Temperate fruits packages of practices 2020 vol 1. Directorate of Agriculture Extension, SKUAST-Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, pp 10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanpied GD, Blak VA (1977) A comparison of pressure tests, acid levels and sensory evaluation of over ripeness in apples. Hortic Sci 12:73–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodor P, Gaál M, Tóth M (2008) Metaxenia in apples cv.‘Rewena’,‘Relinda’,‘Baujade’as influenced by scab resistant pollinizers. Int J Hortic Sci 14(3):11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane JC, Iwakiri BT (1980) Xenia and Metaxenia in Pistachio1. Hortic Sci 15(2):184–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Davarynejad GH, Nyeki J, Hamori Szabo J, Laker Z (1993) Relationship between pollen donors and quality of fruits of 12 apple cultivars. Acta Hortic 368:344–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney JO (1992) Xenia includes metaxenia. Hortic Sci 27(7):722–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallahi E, Simons BR, Fellman JK, Longstroth MA, Colt WM, Ketchie DO (1994) Tree growth and productivity and Postharvest fruit quality in various strains of delicious’ apple. J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 119(3):389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2021) www.fao.org

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. AWilley – Interscience Publication, New York. 690p

  • Goode JE (1975) In: Perreira HC (ed) climate and orchard. CAB, Slough, pp 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorini FLM (1975) Old and new fungicides for the prevention of pome fruits rots. Inf Acaric 32(35):23–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Grab H, Branstetter MG, Amon N, Urban-Mead KR, Park MG, Gibbs J, Blitzer EJ, Poveda K, Loeb G, Danforth BN (2019) Agriculturally dominated landscapes reduce bee phylogenetic diversity and pollination services. Science 363(6424):282–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keulemans J, Brusselle A, Eyssen R, Vercammen J, Van Daele G (1995) Fruit weight in apple as influenced by seed number and pollinizer. In: I Workshop on Pollination, vol 423, pp 201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Yim MS, Shin YU (1979) The selection of of creb apple cultivars as pollinizers for single cultivar commercial orchards. Rural Dev Hort Agric Eng 21:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston GM (1992) Maturity indices for apple and pear. Hortic Rev 13:407–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács S (1976) Results of experiments on metaxenia in apple. Kertészeti Egyetem Közleményei 40:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg HG (1979) Apple growing potentials in Europe. The fulfillment of the cold requirement of the apple trees. Netherl J Agric Sci 27:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg HG (1985) Apple growing potentials in Europe. Flowering dates. Netherl J Agric Sci 33:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Qian Y, Chang Y, Yan Z, Song H, Li L (2000) Effect of metaxenia on the fruit quality of Fuji apple variety. South China Fruits 29(1):35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackowiak M (1974) The effect of alien pollen on the variability of fruit properties in the apple variety Wealthy. Poznanskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciol Nauk Prace Z Zakresu Nauk Rolniczych 37:167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyeki J (1977) Frutification and number of seeds per fruit in pear varieties. Acta Agron Acad Sci Hungricae 269(3–4):282–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyeki J, Soltesz M, Retamales JB, Moggia CL, Banados MP, Torres C, Zaffoli JP (1998) The variations of seed content of fruits in pear varieties, also as a function of different conditions of fertilization, as open pollination, natural Autogamy and allogamy. Acta Hortic 475:2137–2250

    Google Scholar 

  • Park MG, Joshi NK, Rajotte EG, Biddinger DJ, Losey JE, Danforth BN (2020) Apple grower pollination practices and perceptions of alternative pollinators in New York and Pennsylvania. Renew Agric Food Syst 35(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Ngo HT, Aizen MA, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze TD, Dicks LV, Garibaldi LA, Hill R, Settele J, Vanbergen AJ (2016) Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 540(7632):220–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganna S (2017) Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products: Tata McGraw-HillEducation. 1152p

  • Rejman A (1983) The Influence of pollinators on fruit set and some characters of Close apples. Acta Hortic 139:29–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedov EN, Sedova ZA, Maksimova LM (1980) Effect of the pollinizer cultivars on the shape, size and chemical composition of apples. Hortic 50:1659

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltesz M (1996) Requirements for successful fruit set in orchard. In: Nyeki J, Solestz M (eds) Floral biology of temperate zone fruit trees and small fruits. Akademiai kiado, Budapest, pp 257–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Truter AB, Hurndall RF (1988) New findings on determining maturity of ‘Starking’, ‘Topred’ and ‘Starkrimson’ apples. Decid Fruit Grow 38:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanbergen AJ, Initiative TIP (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 11(5):251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangdal E (1985) Quality criteria for fruit for fresh consumption. Acta Agron Scand 35:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RC, Thompson AH (1960) Influence of variety, storage and maturity on the quality of canned apple slices. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 75:61–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wills RBH, Bambridge PA, Scott KJ (1980) The use of flesh firmness and other objective tests to determine consumer acceptability of ‘Delicious’ apples. Austr J Exp Agric Anim Husb 20:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shivali Sharma or Sunny Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Sharma, A.S. Sundouri, D. Attri, K.M. Bhat, A. Kumar, M.K. Sharma and S. Sharma declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Sundouri, A.S., Attri, D. et al. Exploring the Xenia Effect: Differential Responses of Six Pollen Parents with Five Maternal Apple Cultivars. Applied Fruit Science 66, 361–371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01033-8

Keywords

Navigation