Abstract
Phalaenopsis plants are distributed throughout tropical regions with high humidity, which is generally necessary for their cultivation. This study was conducted to determine the effects of different relative humidity (RH) conditions on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of young Phalaenopsis plants. Three-month-old clones of Phalaenopsis ‘Blanc Rouge’ and Doritaenopsis ‘Mantefon’ plants were grown under 30 ± 10, 50 ± 10, 70 ± 10, or 90 ± 10% RH conditions. The RH treatments were maintained for approximately 6 months in environment-controlled growth chambers. The temperature and photoperiod were maintained at 28 °C and 12/12 h, respectively. At the start of the RH treatments, the mean leaf span was 14.2 and 16.7 cm in ‘Blanc Rouge’ and ‘Mantefon’ plants, respectively. In both cultivars, plants grown under 70% RH showed the longest leaf span, which was 25.3 and 20.6 cm in ‘Blanc Rouge’ and ‘Mantefon’, respectively. High-humidity conditions (i.e. 70 and 90% RH) generally promoted the length of leaf span, but the growth rate of leaf span was slightly lower at 90% RH than at 70% RH. CO2 exchange, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate of the uppermost mature leaf were observed in ‘Blanc Rouge’ plants grown at 30, 50, and 70% RH. The highest rate of CO2 uptake was observed in the plants grown at 70% RH, followed by 50 and 30% RH. The stomatal conductance increased and transpiration decreased with increasing RH. The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of plants grown under 70 and 90% RH slightly decreased after 9 weeks of treatments, but there were no differences among the treatment groups at the conclusion of the study. These results indicated that high RH (e.g. 70%) slightly increases CO2 uptake and leaf span of young Phalaenopsis plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aphalo PJ, Jarvis PG (1991) Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant Cell Environ 14:127–132
Bakker JC (1991) Leaf conductance of four glasshouse vegetable crops as affected by air humidity. Agric For Meteorol 55:23–36
Bercu R, Bavaru A, Broascӑ L (2011) Anatomical aspects of Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume. Ann RSCB 16:102–109
Bunce JA (1984) Effects of humidity on photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 35:1245–1251
Carins Murphy MR, Jordan GJ, Brodribb TJ (2014) Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf siza and the density of veins and stomata. Plant Cell Environ 37:124–131
Cha-um S, Ulziibat B, Kirdmanee C (2010) Effects of temperature and relative humidity during in vitro acclimatization, on physiological changes and growth characters of Phalaenopsis adapted to in vivo. Aust J Crop Sci 9:750–756
Chen WH, Chen HH (2011) Orchid biotechnology II, 1st edn. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp 1–2
Christenson EA (2001) Phalaenopsis: a monograph, 1st edn. Timber Press, Portland, pp 21–25
Dodd AN, Borland AM, Haslam RP, Griffiths H, Maxwell K (2002) Crassulacean acid metabolism: plastic, fantastic. J Exp Bot 53:569–580
Epron D, Dreyer E, Breda N (1992) Photosynthesis of oak trees [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] during drought under field conditions: diurnal course of net CO2 assimilation and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II. Plant Cell Environ 15:809–820
Frank PJ, Farquhar GD (1999) A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 22:1337–1349
Grange RI, Hand DW (1987) A review of the effects of atmospheric humidity on the growth of horticultural crops. J Hortic Sci 62:125–134
Griffiths H, Helliker B, Roberts A, Haslam RP, Girnus J, Robe WE, Borland AM, Maxwell K (2002) Regulation of Rubisco activity in crassulacean acid metabolism plants: better late than never. Funct Plant Biol 29:689–696
Herppich WB (1997) Stomatal responses to changes in air humidity are not necessarily linked to nocturnal CO2 uptake in the CAM plant Plectranthus marrubioides Bench. (Lamiaceae). Plant Cell Environ 20:393–399
Ichihashi S, Higuchi T, Shibayama H, Tesima Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ota K (2008) Aspects of CO2 uptake in the crassulacean acid metabolism orchid Phalaenopsis. Acta Hortic 766:245–256
Jeon MW, Ali MB, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2006) Photosynthetic pigments, morphology and leaf gas exchange during ex vitro acclimatization of micropropagated CAM Doritaenopsis plantlets under relative humidity and air temperature. Environ Exp Bot 55:183–194
Konow EA, Wang YT (2001) Irradiance levels affect in vitro and greenhouse growth, flowering, and photosynthetic behavior of a hybrid Phalaenopsis orchid. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:531–536
Lange DL, Medina E (1979) Stomata of the CAM plant Tillandsia recurvata respond directly to humidity. Oecologia 40:357–363
Li R, Guo P, Baum M, Grando S, Ceccarelli S (2006) Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence paramaters as indicators of drought tolerance in barly. Agric Sci China 5:751–757
Lihavainen J, Ahonen V, Keski-Saari S, Kontunen-Soppela S, Oksanen E, Keinanen M (2016) Low vapour pressure deficit affects nitrogen nutrition and foliar metabolites in silver birch. J Exp Bot 67:4353–4365
Lin MJ, Hsu BD (2004) Photosynthetic plasticity of Phalaenopsis in response to different light environments. J Plant Physiol 161:1259–1268
Marler TE, Mickelbart MV (1998) Drought, leaf gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence of field-grown papaya. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:714–718
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668
Maxwell K, Borland AM, Haslam RP, Helliker BR, Roberts A, Griffths H (1999) Modulation of Rubisco activity during the diurnal Phases of the crassulacean acid metabolism plant Kalanchoë daigremontiana. Plant Physiol 121:849–856
Monteith JL (1995) A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ 18:357–364
Netto AT, Campostrini E, de Oliveira JG, Bressan-Smith RE (2005) Photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen, chlorophyll a fluorescence and SPAD-502 readings in coffee leaves. Sci Hortic 104:199–209
Osmond CB (1978) Crassulacean acid metabolism: a curiosity in context. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29:379–414
Pollet B, Steppe K, Dambre P, Van Labeke MC, Lemeur R (2010) Seasonal variation of photosynthesis and photosynthetic efficiency in Phalaenopsis. Photosynthetica 48:580–588
Rawson HM, Begg JE, Woodward RG (1977) The effect of atmospheric humidity on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves of several plant species. Planta 134:5–10
Su V, Hsu BD, Chen WH (2001) The photosynthetic activities of bare rooted Phalaenopsis during storage. Sci Hortic 87:311–318
Ting IP (1985) Crassulacean acid metabolism. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 36:595–622
Yang Z, Sinclair TR, Zhu M, Messina CD, Cooper M, Hammer GL (2012) Temperature effect on transpiration response of maize plants to vapour pressure deficit. Environ Exp Bot 61:145–151
Yin CY, Berninger F, Li CY (2006) Photosynthetic responses of Populus przewalski subjected to drought stress. Photosynthetica 44:62–68
Yoo YK, Roh YS, Nam BC (2016) Occurrence of white rust and growth of chrysanthemum ‘Baekma’ by control of relative humidity with night ventilation and heating in the greenhouse. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 34:845–859
Yordanov I, Velikova V, Tsonev T (2000) Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica 38:171–186
Zou DS, Kahnt G (1988) Effect of air humidity on photosynthesis and transpiration of soybean leaves. J Agron Crop Sci 161:190–194
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Advanced Production Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (114148-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H.B., Lim, S.H., Lim, N.H. et al. Growth and CO2 exchange in young Phalaenopsis orchids grown under different levels of humidity during the vegetative period. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 59, 37–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0005-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0005-3