Skip to main content
Log in

Moral foundations for responsible leadership at a time of crisis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes perceptions of responsible leadership in eight Asia-based firms during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The focal firms were a mixture of multinational corporations (MNCs), large-sized enterprises, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In all eight focal firms, we found that the responsible decision-making of leaders during the pandemic was perceived to be guided by five main moral principles. These comprised equity-based justice for employees, meeting employees’ basic needs, ethics of care for employees, concern for non-employee stakeholders, and interactional justice for employees. We developed a conceptual map of how these principles related to aspects of four ethics-oriented leadership theories. Our analysis also identified four types of responsible leadership policies and practices. These comprised prioritizing the health and safety of stakeholders, flexible work arrangements, meeting employees’ and customers’ special needs, and financial and psychological support for employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Notes

  1. It was mandated by the local authority for everyone to test their temperature before leaving home and no positive cases were found.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

  • Adkins, C. L., Werbel, J. D., & Farh, J. L. (2001). A field study of job insecurity during a financial crisis. Group & Organization Management, 26(4), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlert, M., Funke, K., & Schwettmann, L. (2013). Thresholds, productivity, and context: An experimental study on determinants of distributive behaviour. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(4), 957–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, A. K., Reade, C., & Froese, F. J. (2019). Terrorism and expatriate withdrawal cognitions: The differential role of perceived work and non-work constraints. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(11), 1769–1793.

  • Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods and ESRC. Available at, https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf. Accessed 07.04.2023.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1993). Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 155–170). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartik, A. W., Bertrand, M., Cullen, Z. B., Glaeser, E. L., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. T. (2020). How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey, Available at, https://www.nber.org/papers/w26989. Accessed 19.05.2020.

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1997). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual. Mind Garden, Inc.

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., & Duncan, E. (2020). Workplace issues and Covid-19 in Asia Pacific: Hong Kong, Available at, https://www.kennedyslaw.com/thoughtleadership/article/workplace-issues-covid-19-in-asia-pacific-hong-kong. Accessed 10.06.2020.

  • Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, D. (1981). From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 29–45). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierema, L. L. (2020). HRD research and practice after ‘The Great COVID-19 Pause’: The time is now for bold, critical, research. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (Eds.). (1986). Justice and social relations. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1989). Managing conflict before it happens: The role of accounts. In M. Afzalur Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 83–91). Praeger, New York.

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986a). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986b). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobocel, D. R., & Farrell, A. C. (1996). Sex-based promotion decisions and interactional fairness: Investigating the influence of managerial accounts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., & Nieuwenburg, P. (2013). The moral costs of discretionary decision-making in crisis: Hurricane Katrina and the memorial hospital tragedy. Public Integrity, 15(4), 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. (2008). Leadership development from a complexity perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(4), 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E. (2007). Misconceptions of ethical leadership: How to avoid potential pitfalls. Organizational Dynamics, 36(2), 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., Bresnen, M., Beardsworth, A., & Keil, T. (1988). Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Human Relations, 41(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, M. Y. (2018). Does HRD have a moral duty to respond to matters of social injustice? Human Resource Development International, 21(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caleo, S. (2018). When distributive justice and gender stereotypes coincide: Reactions to equity and equality violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. (2011). Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2016). A duty to care? Evidence of the importance of organizational culture to effective governance and leadership. CIPD. Available at, https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/a-duty-to-care_2016-evidence-of-the-importance-of-organisational-culture-to-effective-governance-and-leadership_tcm18-14220.pdf. Accessed 12.10.2023.

  • Ciulla, J. B. (1995). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coldwell, D. A. L., Joosub, T., & Papageorgiou, E. (2012). Responsible leadership in organizational crises: An analysis of the effects of public perceptions of selected SA business organizations’ reputations. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. (2015). The core of care ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven, M., Liu, L., Mysore, M., & Wilson, M. (2020). COVID-19: Implications for business. Retrieved from http://www.amcham egypt.org/bic/pdf/corona1/McKinsey_Co%20-%20COVID-19-Implications%20For%20Business.pdf. Accessed 03.05.2020.

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2020). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w27055. Accessed 10.07.2020.

  • Dion, M. (2012). Are ethical theories relevant for ethical leadership? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(1), 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engster, D. (2007). The heart of justice: Care ethics and political theory. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evanschitzky, H., Iyer, G. R., Plassmann, H., Niessing, J., & Meffert, H. (2006). The relative strength of affective commitment in securing loyalty in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1207–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, P. C., & Kittler, M. G. (2017). How do you fear? Examining expatriates’ perception of danger and its consequences. Journal of Global Mobility, 5(4), 391–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1979). Golden rule. In A. Flew (Ed.), A dictionary of philosophy (p. 134). London: Pan Books/MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. (2005). Non-Probability Sampling. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 859–864). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gangloff, B., Mayoral, L., & Rezrazi, A. (2016). Performance, need and discriminatory allegiance of employees as awarding criteria of distributive justice. International Journal of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, 10(5), 1450–1457.

  • Garsten, C., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2009). Ethical dilemmas in management. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, M. L., & McGuire, D. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Rodeschini, G. (2016). Caring as a collective knowledgeable doing: About concern and being concerned. Management Learning, 47(3), 266–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giberson, T. R., & Resick, C. (2001). Transferring leader values: Using ASA to understand organizational culture creation. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Gigliotti, R. A. (2016). Leader as performer; leader as human: A discursive and retrospective construction of crisis leadership. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24(4), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (1998). Moral leadership and business ethics. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 27–45). Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2001). Primal leadership: The hidden driver of great performance. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Equity and the use of over reward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press.

  • Harvey, S., & Haines, V. Y., III. (2005). Employer treatment of employees during a community crisis: The role of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2020). Mitigating the impact of COVID-19: Guidance for Hong Kong retail businesses. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/cn/pdf/en/2020/04/mitigating-the-impact-of-covid-19-guidance-for-hong-kong-retail-businesses.pdf. Accessed 04.05.2020.

  • Larres, P., & Kelly, M. (2023). A framework for authentic ethical decision making in the face of grand challenges: A Lonerganian gradation. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(2), 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., Michaels, J. W., & Sanford, C. (1972). Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(1), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., Weiss, T., & Buttrick, R. (1973). Attribution of value, equity, and the prevention of waste in reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Justice and Social Interaction, 3(1), 167–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008a). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multilevel assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008b). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.

  • Liu, B. F., Shi, D., Lim, J. R., Islam, K., Edwards, A. L., & Seeger, M. (2022). When crises hit home: How US higher education leaders navigate values during uncertain times. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, L. P., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (1995). Perceptions of internal and external equity as predictors of outside salespeople’s job satisfaction. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 15(2), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, R., Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, S., & Mishra, M. (2020). Non-monetary levers to enhance employee engagement in organizations – “GREAT” model of motivation during the Covid-19 crisis. Strategic HR Review, 19(4), 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. J., & Fernando, R. (2020). The global macroeconomic impacts of COVID-19: Seven scenarios. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3547729. Accessed 06.05.2020.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Dröge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, M., Dickie, C., & Butler, B. (2012). Global economic crisis: Employee Responses and practical implications for organizations. Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J., & Kurucz, E. (2019). Relational leadership for sustainability: Building an ethical framework from the moral theory of “ethics of care.” Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. A. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. M. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. M. (2023). On the global emergence of responsible leadership: Purpose and social identity. Emerald Open Research, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-11-2023-0003.

  • Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Waldman, D. A. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., & Vachhani, S. (2021). Feminist ethics and women leaders: From difference to intercorporeality. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripamonti, S. C., Galuppo, L., Petrilli, S., Dentali, S., & Zuffo, R. G. (2021). Care ethics management and redesign organization in the new normal. Frontiers of Psychology, 12, 747617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. F. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(2), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. I., Korbin, W. P., & Viscarra, D. M. (1995). Corporate support in the aftermath of a natural disaster: Effects on employee strains. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1975). The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2001). Virtuous responses to organizational crisis: Aaron Feuerstein and Milt Colt. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow, T., & Seeger, M. (2020). Theorizing crisis communication (2nd Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Sendjaya, S., Eva, N., Butar-Butar, I., Robin, M., & Castles, S. (2019). SLBS-6: Validation of a short form of the servant leadership behavior scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). What’s your story? A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J., & Cook, P. E. (1973). Leadership in dyadic groups as a function of dominance and incentives. Sociometry, 36(4), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S. (2000). Studying moral ethos using an adapted Kohlbergian model. Organization Studies, 21(1), 267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John III, B., & Pearson, Y. E. (2016). Crisis management and ethics: Moving beyond the public-relations-person-as-corporate-conscience construct. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teng-Calleja, M., Caringal-Go, J. F., Manaois, J. O., & IsidroZantua, Y. M. Q. S. R. M. (2020). Examining organizational response and employee coping behaviors amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 15(3), 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum.

  • Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (2020). Assessment report on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Chinese enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.cn.undp.org/content/china/en/home/library/crisis_prevention_and_recovery/assessment-report-on-impact-of-covid-19-pandemic-on-chinese-ente.html. Accessed 04.05.2020.

  • Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A. (2011). Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership: Three caveats to guide theory and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Balven, R. M. (2014). Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A., & Stahl, G. K. (2016). Foundations of responsible leadership: Asian versus Western executive responsibility orientations toward key stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 623–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Michel, J. W. (2006). Proactive influence tactics and leader member exchange. In C. A. Schriesheim & L. L. Neider (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations: New empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 87–103). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2020). COVID-19’s impact on China’s small and medium-sized business, Retrieved from https://www.ifpri.org/blog/covid-19s-impact-chinas-small-and-medium-sized-businesses. Accessed 03.05.2020.

  • Zhang, Z.-X., Yi, X., & Dong, Y. (2023). Taking the path less traveled: How responsible leadership addresses a grand challenge in public health, a case study from China. Management and Organization Review, 19(4), 838–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Khurshid.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The research was conducted in accordance with accepted ethical principles of research.

Consent to participate

Interviewees were informed that the research was being conducted for purely academic purposes and they have indicated their informed consent to be interviewed and recorded.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khurshid, H., Wu, C.X. & Snell, R.S. Moral foundations for responsible leadership at a time of crisis. Asian J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00201-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00201-z

Keywords

Navigation