Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moving Forward with the Concept of Responsible Leadership: Three Caveats to Guide Theory and Research

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of responsible leadership has garnered increased attention in recent years. Indeed, irresponsibility on the part of organizational leaders appears to represent an area of growing concern to the greater public. Accordingly, it is appropriate that increased scholarly attention be devoted to an understanding of this concept. But with that said, the purpose of this article is to identify three caveats about which researchers and practitioners should be concerned as work in this area proceeds. These caveats pertain to: (1) definitional issues, (2) the importance of theory and research that is not ideologically driven or biased, and (3) the positioning of responsible leadership within the greater body of leadership theory and research. Additional concerns are considered including the measurement of responsible leadership and research strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management, 31, 300–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1997). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual. Palo Alto, CA: Mindgarden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 3–24). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, B. (2009). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business to increase its profits. New York Times, September 13, pp. 122–126.

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (2004). Moral leadership and business ethics. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 25–43). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris Interactive. (2009). http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/Harris-Interactive-Poll-Research-FT-2009-Business-leaders-4.pdf.

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7, 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, M. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). ‘Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, J. (2009). The Whole Foods Alternative to Obamacare, Wall Street Journal, August 11. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html.

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, M. (2009). Boycotting Whole Foods, theatlantic.com, August 17. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/08/boycotting-whole-foods/23348.

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M. (1982). The spirit of democratic capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • NowPublic.com. (2009). John Mackey Health Care Views Launch Whole Foods Boycott, August 14. http://www.nowpublic.com/health/john-mackey-health-care-views-launch-whole-foods-boycott.

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–18). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen Reports. (2009). Just 53% Say capitalism Better than Socialism, April. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2009/just_53_say_capitalism_better_than_socialism.

  • Reason. (2005). Rethinking the social responsibility of business: A Reason debate featuring Milton Friedman, Whole Foods’ John Mackey, and Cypress Semiconductor’s T. J. Rodgers’, October. http://www.reason.com/news/show/32239.html.

  • Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 626–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvery, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership form the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. (2008). Defining the Socially Responsible Leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1703–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24, 266–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15, 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 874006, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4006, USA

    David A. Waldman

Authors
  1. David A. Waldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Waldman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waldman, D.A. Moving Forward with the Concept of Responsible Leadership: Three Caveats to Guide Theory and Research. J Bus Ethics 98 (Suppl 1), 75–83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation