Skip to main content
Log in

Intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer with pull through delayed anastomosis. An alternative to coloanal anastomosis with covering ileostomy

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge used to be abdominoperineal resection (APR). In recent years sphincter saving techniques, like intersphincteric resection (ISR) proved to be an ongologically accepted alternative. Operations for ultra low rectal cancer are challenging and coloanal anastomosis is probably the source of most postoperative complications. We present ISR with pull-through delayed anastomosis (PTDA) as a surgical option for the management of elective cases, when standard coloanal anastomosis (CAA) is at greater risk of dehiscence or a covering stoma is refused or dangerous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet 1986;327:1479–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1995;38:361–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Konanz J, Herrle F, Weiss C, et al. Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a matched-pair analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:679–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laxamana A, Solomon MJ, Cohen Z, et al. Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1995;38:1246–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, et al. Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2006;49:S13–S22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G, et al. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1992;163:407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, et al. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2009;52:950–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2005;48:1858–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bordeianou L, Maguire LH, Alavi K, et al. Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: Techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:1358–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Akagi Y, Kinugasa T, Shirouzu K. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review. Surg Today 2012;43:838–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spanos CP. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: An overview. International Journal of Surgical Oncology 2012;2012:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JC, Yu CS, Lim SB, et al. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;28:493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg 2009;33:1750–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cong J-C, Dai X-W, Chen C-S, et al. Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2007;19:295–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zuo Z-G, Song H-Y, Xu C, et al. Value of protective stoma in intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010;48:1479–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nurkin S, Kakarla VR, Ruiz DE, et al. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:e309–e316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hallet J, Bouchard A, Drolet S, et al. Anastomotic salvage after rectal cancer resection using the Turnbull–Cutait delayed anastomosis. Can J Surg 2014;57:405–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fixot K, Galifet M, Scherrer M-L, et al. Abdominoperineal pull-through resection with delayed coloanal anastomosis as treatment option for complex recto-urinary fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;29:407–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hallet J, Milot H, Drolet S, et al. The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:579–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veenhof AAFA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, et al. Pull-through procedure as treatment for coloanal anastomotic dehiscence following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;22:1413–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murrell Z, Stamos M. Reoperation for anastomotic failure. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery 2006;19:213–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pronio A, Di Filippo A, Narilli P, et al. Anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery. Analysis of 1290 patients. Chir Ital 2007;59:599–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasperk R, Philipps B, Vahrmeyer M, et al. Risk factors for anastomosis dehiscence after very deep colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. Chirurg 2000;71:1365–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Bolanis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolanis, I., Bassioukas, S., Psilopoulos, D. et al. Intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer with pull through delayed anastomosis. An alternative to coloanal anastomosis with covering ileostomy. Hellenic J Surg 88, 417–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0363-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0363-1

Key words

Navigation