Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radical surgical treatment for very low rectal cancer near the anus has generally involved abdominoperineal resection. Various sphincter-saving operations have been developed for such tumors to optimize the patients’ postoperative quality of life. Current protocols focus on intersphincteric resection (ISR), which differs from conventional hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA) after low anterior resection. However, the efficacy of ISR remains unclear. The surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes after intersphincteric resection (ISR) were reviewed. This review of the current literature was conducted by searching the PubMed online database. Articles focusing specifically on conventional hand-sewn CAA were excluded from this study. The mean mortality rate is <2 %, and the mean morbidity rate ranges from 7.7 to 38.3 %. The mean local recurrence rate varies widely from 0 to 22.7 %, with a mean follow-up duration of 40–94 months. The mean disease-free and overall 5-year survival rates are 69–86 and 79–97 months, respectively. Functional outcomes are generally acceptable, but accurate evaluation is extremely difficult due to the absence of unified appraisal methods. ISR appears surgically, oncologically and functionally acceptable. However, more experience and better understanding of the oncology, anal physiology, and pelvic anatomy are necessary to achieve successful outcomes without complications, and to improve patient survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1168–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y, Kishimoto Y, Sato Y. A new ultimate anus-preserving operation for extremely low rectal cancer and for anal canal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:203–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Morihiro M, Kosugi C, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vorobiev GI, Odaryuk TS, Tsarkov PV, Talalakin AI, Rybakov EG. Resection of the rectum and total excision of the internal anal sphincter with smooth muscle plasty and colonic pouch for treatment of ultralow rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1506–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Renner K, Hölbling N, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1858–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2 cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005;241:465–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Matzel K, Bittorf B, Papadopoulos T, Gohl J. The influence of abdomino-perianal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:23–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chin CC, Yeh CY, Huang WS, Wang JY. Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:640–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, Maeda K, Mochizuki H, Koda K, et al. Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:S13–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, Bennis M, Dehni N, Park R, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:916–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2007;94:341–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krand O, Yalti T, Tellioglu G, Kara M, Berber I, Titiz MI. Use of smooth muscle plasty after intersphincteric rectal resection to replace a partially resected internal anal sphincter: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1895–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Yoneyama Y, et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2009;33:1750–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, Zheng Y, Wang ZJ. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People’s Republic of China. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:950–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiser MR, Quah HM, Shia J, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Temple LK, et al. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection. Ann Surg. 2009;249:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, Wang W, Tam KW, Liang HH, et al. Oncological and functional outcome of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:e93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Renner K, Rosen H, Novi G, Hölbling N, Schiessel R. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1160–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Günther K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W. Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:458–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y. Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, Fukunaga M, Tsuji Y, Takano M. Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1272–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Zerbib F, Rullier E. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:963–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:975–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyttle JA, Parks AG. Intersphincteric excision of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1977;64:413–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shelygin YA, Vorobiev GI, Pikunov DY, Markova EV, Djhanaev YA, Fomenko OY. Intersphincteric resection with partial removal of external anal sphincter for low rectal cancer. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2008;55:45–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. Mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shirouzu K, Ogata Y. Histopathologic tumor spread in very low rectal cancer treated with abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1887–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vernava AM 3rd, Moran M, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD. A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:333–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shirouzu K, lsomoto H, Kakegawa T. Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer. 1995;76:388–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F, Lavarino C, Bufalino R, Tomasic G, et al. Distal intramural spread in adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum treated with total rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:25–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, et al. Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuvshinoff B, Maghfoor I, Miedema B, Bryer M, Westgate S, Wilkes J, et al. Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:163–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J, Suriawinata A, Riedel E, Moore HG, et al. A Prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation. Ann Surg. 2007;245:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Holzer B, Urban M, Hölbling N, Feil W, Novi G, Hruby W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation. Surgery. 2003;133:656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Urban M, Rosen HR, Hölbling N, Feil W, Hochwarther G, Hruby W, et al. MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials. Radiology. 2000;214:503–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beets-Tan RG, Lettinga T, Beets GL. Pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:681–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Haboubi N, Bokey L. Magnetic resonance imaging cannot predict histological tumour involvement of a circumferential surgical margin in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:974–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bamba Y, Itabashi M, Kameoka S. Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection. Surg Today. 2012;42:328–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rullier E, Laurent C, Carles J, Saric J, Michel P, Parneix M. Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal and anterior resection. Br J Surg. 1997;84:525–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hassan I, Larson DW, Wolff BG, Cima RR, Chua HK, Hahnloser D, et al. Impact of pelvic radiotherapy on morbidity and durability of sphincter preservation after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonnel C, Parc YR, Pocard M, Dehni N, Caplin S, Parc R, et al. Effects of preoperative radiotherapy for primary resectable rectal adenocarcinoma on male sexual and urinary function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:934–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nagamatsu Y, Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Ogata Y, Tsuchida I, Akagi Y. Surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis. Surg Today. 1998;28:696–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ortiz H, Armendariz P. Anterior resection: do the patients perceive any clinical benefit? Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:191–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:650–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1978;65:695–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Beersiek F, Parks AG, Swash M. Pathogenesis of ano-rectal incontinence. A histometric study of the anal sphincter musculature. J Neurol Sci. 1979;42:111–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1082–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg. 1988;75:318–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Parks AG, et al. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1982;69:301–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 996; 224:58–65.

  58. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hashimoto H, Shiokawa H, Funahashi K, Saito N, Sawada T, Shirouzu K, et al. Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:928–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Araki Y, Momosaki K, Nozoe Y, Hayashi K, Yamada K, Kanazawa M, et al. Graciloplasty for internal and external sphincteric resection of lower rectal cancer. Kurume Med J. 2004;51:287–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lange MM, den Dulk M, Bossema ER, Maas CP, Peeters KC, Rutten HJ, et al. Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision Trial. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1278–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tsukasa H, Hiroki Y. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000–2009. Surg Today. 2011;41:1583–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sponsorship or grants: this study was not performed under any commercial sponsorship or grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan

    Yoshito Akagi, Tetsushi Kinugasa & Kazuo Shirouzu

Authors
  1. Yoshito Akagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tetsushi Kinugasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuo Shirouzu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshito Akagi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akagi, Y., Kinugasa, T. & Shirouzu, K. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review. Surg Today 43, 838–847 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0394-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0394-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation