Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current literature on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in nonagenarians and to provide updated clinical evidence of its feasibility, effectiveness, and safety in nonagenarians. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported the clinical outcomes of nonagenarians with acute ischemic stroke after undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Risk of bias was assessed using different scales. I2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the results, while meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity. Thirteen studies and 657 patients were included. The estimated rate of successful revascularization was 80.82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.48–83.97%), and the rate of favorable outcome (modified Rankin score [mRS] 0–2) was 21.60% (95% CI: 13.81–30.41%). The rate of good outcome (mRS score 0–3) was 23.08% (95% CI: 18.88–27.55%). The estimated risk of death during hospitalization was 20.55% (95% CI: 15.93–25.55%), while the mortality rate at 3 months was 44.38% (95% CI: 33.66–55.36%). The rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurrence was 12.84% (95% CI: 5.27–22.68%), while the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was 3.52% (95% CI: 1.67–5.85%). The rate of hospital-related complications was 26.93% (95% CI: 10.53–47.03%). MT in nonagenarians demonstrated a high rate of successful revascularization. Conversely, the rate of futile revascularization is high with a low functional independence proportion. Therefore, MT should not be indiscriminately advocated in nonagenarians. Satisfactory results require careful selection of patients. Further high-quality studies are needed to clarify the selection algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khan MA, Baird GL, Miller D, Patel A, Tsekhan S, Yaghi S, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with younger patients in a multicenter cohort. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(8):727–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012427.
Karhi S, Nerg O, Miettinen T, Makipaakkanen E, Taina M, Manninen H, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy of large artery occlusion is beneficial in octogenarians. In Vivo. 2018;32(5):1223–30. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11368.
Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503780.
Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener H-C, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.
Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DWJ, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00163-x.
Alawieh A, Starke RM, Chatterjee AR, Turk A, De Leacy R, Rai AT, et al. Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in the elderly: a 'real-world' multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(6):545–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014289.
Martini M, Mocco J, Turk A, Siddiqui AH, Fiorella D, Hanel R, et al. An international multicenter retrospective study to survey the landscape of thrombectomy in the treatment of anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: outcomes with respect to age. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(2):115–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015093.
Tonetti DA, Gross BA, Desai SM, Jadhav AP, Jankowitz BT, Jovin TG. Final infarct volume of <10 cm(3) is a strong predictor of return to home in nonagenarians undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. World Neurosurg. 2018;119:e941–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.008.
Andrews CE, Mouchtouris N, Fitchett EM, Al Saiegh F, Lang MJ, Romo VM, et al. Revascularization and functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in elderly patients. J Neurosurg. 2019;132:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.Jns182399.
Drouard-de Rousiers E, Lucas L, Richard S, Consoli A, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, et al. Impact of reperfusion for nonagenarians treated by mechanical thrombectomy: insights from the ETIS registry. Stroke. 2019;50(11):3164–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026448.
Meyer L, Alexandrou M, Leischner H, Flottmann F, Deb-Chatterji M, Abdullayev N, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians with acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(11):1091–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014785.
Wu Q, Li Q, Huang C, Li Y, Wolff V, Qin X. Efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke in nonagenarians. Eur Neurol. 2019;81(3-4):174–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501552.
Gomes C, Barcelos V, Guiomar V, Pintalhao M, Almeida J, Fonseca L. Outcomes of reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in patients aged 90 years or older: a retrospective study. Intern Emerg Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02318-y.
Sussman ES, Martin B, Mlynash M, Marks MP, Marcellus D, Albers G, et al. Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with octogenarians. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(3):266–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015147.
Sweid A, Weinberg JH, Xu V, Shivashankar K, Alexander TD, Khalife J, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients greater than 90 years of age: experience in 26 patients in a large tertiary care center and outcome comparison with younger patients. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e835–e41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.024.
Ospel JM, Kashani NN, Menon B, Almekhlafi M, Wilson A, Fischer U, et al. Endovascular treatment decision making in octogenarians and nonagenarians : insights from UNMASK EVT an International Multidisciplinary Study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00848-3.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (London, England). 2010;8(5):336–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). Jama. 1995;274(13):1017–25.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet (London, England). 1998;352(9136):1245–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08020-9.
Group. NIoNDaSr-PSS. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199512143332401.
Bai X, Feng Y, Yang K, Wang T, Luo J, Wang X, et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the anterior cerebral circulation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01325-6.
Feng Y, Li L, Bai X, Wang T, Chen Y, Zhang X, et al. Risk factors for new ischaemic cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e030025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030025.
Lo CK, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45.
Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid-Based Med. 2018;23(2):60–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853.
Zhang X, Yu Y, Yang K, Bai X, Wang T, Feng Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of radiation-induced carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(8):104929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104929.
Agarwal S, Huang J, Scher E, Farkas J, Arcot K, Gordon D, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians: a propensity score matched analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;104870:104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104870.
Janssen H, Nannoni S, Francois O, Dewaele T, De Blauwe S, Vanhooren G, et al. Multicenter, retrospective analysis of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(8):104817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104817.
Meyer L, Alexandrou M, Flottmann F, Deb-Chatterji M, Abdullayev N, Maus V, et al. Endovascular treatment of very elderly patients aged >/=90 with acute ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5):e014447. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014447.
Möhlenbruch M, Pfaff J, Schönenberger S, Nagel S, Bösel J, Herweh C, et al. Endovascular stroke treatment of nonagenarians. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(2):299–303. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4976.
Mueller-Kronast NH, Zaidat OO, Froehler MT, Jahan R, Aziz-Sultan MA, Klucznik RP, et al. Systematic evaluation of patients treated with neurothrombectomy devices for acute ischemic stroke: primary results of the STRATIS registry. Stroke. 2017;48(10):2760–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016456.
Caruso JP, Wu E, Vance AZ, Olson D, Ban VS, El-Ahmadieh T, et al. Does endovascular therapy change outcomes in nonagenarians with acute ischemic stroke? J Clin Neurosci. 2020;78:207–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.060.
Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442.
Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414792.
Azkune Calle I, Bocos Portillo J, Anton-Ladislao A, Gil Garcia A, Gonzalez Diaz E, Gomez-Beldarrain M, et al. Clinical outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for stroke in the elderly. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(3):582–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.117.
Janardhan V, Venizelos A, Gianatasio RM, Chen SH, Bhuva P, Murray MM et al. Abstract W MP8: The natural history of acute ischemic stroke from large vessel proximal occlusion: a comparison with the IMS III patients. Stroke. 2014;45:AWMP8. https://doi.org/str.45.suppl_1.wmp8
Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973.
Lee SH, Kim BJ, Han MK, Park TH, Lee KB, Lee BC, et al. Futile reperfusion and predicted therapeutic benefits after successful endovascular treatment according to initial stroke severity. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1237-2.
Kaesmacher J, Dobrocky T, Heldner MR, Bellwald S, Mosimann PJ, Mordasini P, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcome differences among patients with TICI2b versus TICI3 reperfusions: success revisited. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(9):910–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317602.
van Horn N, Kniep H, Leischner H, McDonough R, Deb-Chatterji M, Broocks G, et al. Predictors of poor clinical outcome despite complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;13:14–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015889.
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (grant number 2016YFC1301703) and the Beijing Scientific and Technologic Project (grant number Z201100005520019). The funders have no role in study design, data analysis, and writing for manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XB, XZ, YZ, and LJ developed the initial idea for this study. TW, XZ, YF, YW, XW, and KY developed and revised the search strategy. XB, XZ, YZ, WY, YM, and LJ formulated the study design. LJ and YM were consulted about clinical issues. XB and XZ contributed to the original draft. XB, XZ, WY, YZ, TW, KY, YM, and LJ were responsible for the revision of the draft. XB, XZ, and YZ contributed equally and are co-first authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 1292 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Nonagenarians: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transl. Stroke Res. 12, 394–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00894-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00894-5