Abstract
In two studies, we investigated participants’ ability to recognize a missing older adult featured in a mock Silver Alert. Previous research on face recognition indicates the presence of biases related to demographic variables such as gender, race, and age; thus, we compared recognition of the target in relation to these variables. Further, we explored recognition of the target in relation to empathy, conscientiousness, attitudes toward and contact with older individuals as these variables may play a role in motivation and attention to these types of alerts. In Study 1, college students (N = 610) viewed both a video of the missing man and an educational video on Silver Alerts before attempting recognition, whereas in Study 2 (N = 350), we experimentally manipulated whether participants viewed the educational video. Both studies resulted in high recognition rates (83.90% and 75.1%, respectively). Study 2 did not show a significant effect of the educational video, perhaps because of the effectiveness other components of both studies, such as the additional video of the target. Those who recognized the target had significantly higher empathy scores and metacognitive ratings (i.e., confidence) in both studies, with inconsistent differences on other individual difference variables. Caucasian participants were more likely than African-American participants to recognize the Caucasian male target, consistent with previous research on Own-Race Bias in face recognition. Additional research is needed to explore ways of improving the public’s ability to recognize missing senior citizens.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman JM, Shapiro JR, Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, Griskevicius V et al (2006) They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): from out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychol Sci 17(10):836–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x
Allport GW, Kramer BM (1946) Some roots of prejudice. The Journal of Psychology 22(1):9–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917293
Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12(6):1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206441
Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2006) Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition. N Am J Psychol 8(2):237–252
Baldwin S, Eisenman D, Sayles J, Ryan G, Chuang K (2011) Identification of human trafficking victims in health care settings. Health Hum Rights 13(1):36–49 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/healhumarigh.13.1.36. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
Bartolomey D (2001) Cross-racial identification testimony and what not to do about it: a comment on the cross-racial jury charge and cross-racial expert identification testimony. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.247
Bernstein M, Young SG, Hugenberg K (2007) The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychol Sci 18:706–712
Brigham J, Barkowitz P (1978) Do “they all look alike”? The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. J Appl Soc Psychol 8(4):306–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00786.x
Brigham JC, Malpass RS (1985) The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own-and other-race persons. J Soc Issues 41:139–155
Brigham JC, WolfsKeil MP (1983) Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law Hum Behav 7(4):337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044736
Cadieux J, Chasteen AL, Packer (2019) Intergenerational contact predicts attitudes toward older adults through inclusion of the outgroup in the self. J. Gerontol: Series B 74(4):575–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx176
Cassia VM, Picozzi M, Kuefner D, Casati M (2009) Short article: why mix-ups don’t happen in the nursery: evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age effect. Q J Exp Psychol 62(6):1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802617654
Chiroro P, Valentine T (1995) An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol 48A(4):879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401421
Corenblum B, Meissner CA (2006) Recognition of faces of ingroup and outgroup children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol 93(3):187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.001
Cross JF, Cross J, Daly J (1971) Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Percept Psychophys 10(6):393–396. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210319
Cusimano MD, Chipman M, Donnelly P, Hutchison MG (2014) Effectiveness of an educational video on concussion knowledge in minor league hockey players: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 48:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091660
Davidson LR, Duberman L (1982) Friendship: communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles J Res 8(8):809–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287852
Decety J, Jackson PL (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3(2):71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Dickter CL, Gagnon KT, Gyurovski II, Brewington BS (2015) Close contact with racial outgroup members moderates attentional allocation towards outgroup versus ingroup faces. Group Process Intergroup Relat 18(1):76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214527854
Drury L, Hutchison PS, Abrams D (2016) Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people's attitudes towards older adults. Br J Soc Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12146
Ebner NC, Johnson MK (2009) Young and older emotional faces: are there age group differences in expression identification and memory? Emotion 9(3):329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015179
Eisenberg N, Eggum ND, Di Giunta L (2010) Empathy related responding: associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Soc Issues Policy Rev 4:143–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
Elliott DN, Wittenberg BH (1955) Accuracy of identification of Jewish and non-Jewish photographs. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 51(2):339–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043566
Feingold GA (1914) The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. J Crim Law Criminol 5:39–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1133283
Feinman S, Entwisle DR (1976) Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Dev 47(2):506–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128809
Ferguson E (2004) Conscientiousness, emotional stability, perceived control and the frequency, recency, rate and years of blood donor behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 9:293–314. https://doi.org/10.1348/1359107041557011
Galinsky A, Moskowitz G (2000) Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(4):708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708
Gier VS (2019) Recognition of a missing male senior citizen from a mock silver alert. Under review, Applied Cognitive Psychology. Under review
Gier VS, Kreiner DS (2009) Memory of children's faces by adults: Appearance does matter. Appl Cogn Psychol 23(7):972–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739792
Gier VS, Kreiner DS (2018) Different versions of silver alerts: text vs. no text, single vs. multiple photos, and voiceover vs. no voiceover. Poster presentation at 59th Annual National Convention at Psychonomic Society. Held in New Orleans, LA, Nov 15-18, 2018
Gier VS, Kreiner DS (2019) When are silver alerts effective? Metacognitive and individual differences. Poster presented at the 61st Annual National Conference at the Association for Psychological Sciences, Washington, D.C., May 25, 2019
Gier VS, Kreiner DS, Hudnell J (2011) AMBER alert: are school-type photographs the best choice for recognizing missing children. J Police Crim Psychol 23:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z
Gier VS, Kreiner DS, Lampinen JM (2017) Factors affecting recognitions of senior citizens in a silver alert. J Police Crim Psychol 32(3):185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0
Goldberg LR, Johnson JA, Eber HW, Hogan R, Ashton MC, Cloninger CR, Gough HG (2006) The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J Res Pers 40(1):84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Gorelik Y, Damron-Rodrigues J, Funderburk B, Solomon DH (2010) Undergraduate interest in aging: is it affected by contact with older adults? Journal of Educational Gerontology 26(7):623–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270050200626
Gwinn GD, Barden J, Judd CM (2015) Face recognition in the presence of angry expressions: a target-race effect rather than a cross-race effect. J Exp Soc Psychol 58:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.12.001
Harrison V, Hole GJ (2009) Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition. Psychon Bull Rev 16:264. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.264
Harwood J, Hewstone M, Paolini S, Voci A (2005) Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: moderator and mediator effects. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 31(3):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271577
Hehman E, Mania EW, Gaertner SL (2010) Where the division lies: common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect. J Exp Soc Psychol 46(2):445–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.008
Herlitz A, Lovén J (2013) Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic review. Vis Cogn 21(9–10):1306–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823140
Hills PJ (2012) A developmental study of the own-age face recognition bias in children. Dev Psychol 48(2):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026524
Hills PJ, Lewis MB (2011) Rapid communication: the own-age face recognition bias in children and adults. Q J Exp Psychol 64(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.537926
Howe ML, Knott LM (2015) The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: lessons from the past and their modern consequences. Memory 23(5):633–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1010709
Hugenberg K, Sacco DF (2008) Social categorization and stereotyping: how social categorization biases person perception and face memory. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2(2):1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2008.00090.x
Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2006) Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. J Adolesc 29:589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
Kessels RP, van Doormaal A, Janzen G (2011) Landmark recognition in Alzheimer’s dementia: spared implicit memory for objects relevant for navigation. PLoS One 6:e18611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018611
Kogan N (1961) Attitudes toward old people: the development of a scale and an examination of correlates. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62(1):44–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048053
Ladd D, Henry RA (2000) Helping coworkers and helping the organization: The role of support perceptions, exchange ideology, and conscientiousness. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(10):2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02422.x
Lampinen J, Arnal JD, Adams J, Courtney K, Hicks JL (2012) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychol Crime Law 18(4):405–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.499873
Ledonne EN, Poirier CR, Craton LG (2009) Reducing own-age bias: does contact improve young adults’ recognition of older faces? Journal of Undergraduate Research 14(4):137–141 retrieved on 5/7/2019 from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psichi.org/resource/resmgr/journal_2009/Winter09JNLeDonne.pdf
Leo RA (2017) The criminology of wrongful conviction: a decade later. J Contemp Crim Justice 33(1):82–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216673013
Levin DT (1996) Classifying faces by race: the structure of face categories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(6):1364–1382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364
Lewin C, Herlitz A (2002) Sex differences in face recognition—women’s faces make the difference. Brain Cogn 50:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00016-7
Lindholm T (2005) Own-age biases in verbal person memory. Memory 13(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000549
Lindzey G, Rogolsky S (1950) Prejudice and identification of minority group membership. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 45(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055637
MacLin OH, Malpass RS (2001) Racial categorization of faces: the ambiguous race face effect. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):98–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.98
MacLin OH, Malpass RS (2003) The ambiguous-race face illusion. Perception 32(2):249–252. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5046
Malpass RS, Kravitz J (1969) Recognition for faces of own and other race. J Pers Soc Psychol 13(4):330–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028434
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr (1987) Validation of a five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
Moon H, Livne E, Marinova S (2013) Understanding the independent influence of duty and achievement striving when predicting the relationship between conscientiousness and organizational cultural profiles and helping behaviors. J Pers Assess 95:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.740539
Nelson TD (2005) Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self. J Soc Issues 61(2):207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x
North MS, Fiske ST (2013) Subtyping ageism: policy issues in succession and consumption. Soc Issues Policy Rev 7(1):36–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01042.x
Parker S, de Vries B (1993) Patterns of friendship for women and men in same and cross-sex relationships. J Soc Pers Relat 10(4):617–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593104010
Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR, Wagner U, Christ O (2011) Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int J Intercult Relat 35(3):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
Proietti V, Laurence SK, Matthews CM, Zhou X, Mondloch CJ (2018) Attending to identity cues reduces the own-age but not the own-race recognition advantage. Vis Res, online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.010
Quinn PC, Yahr J, Kuhn A, Slater AM, Pascalis O (2002) Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: a preference for female. Perception 31(9):1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3331
Ramsey JL, Langlois JH, Marti NC (2005) Infant categorization of faces: ladies first. Dev Rev 25(2):212–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.01.001
Rehnman J, Herlitz A (2006) Higher face recognition ability in girls: magnified by own-sex and own ethnicity bias. Memory 14:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210500233581
Rehnman J, Herlitz A (2007) Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychol 124(3):344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.004
Rhodes MG, Anastasi JS (2012) The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 138:146–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025750
Roberts BW, Jackson JJ, Fayard JV, Edmonds G, Meints J (2009) Conscientiousness. In: Leary MR, Hoyle RH (eds) Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 369–381
Secord PF, Bevan W, Katz B (1956) The Negro stereotype and perceptual accentuation. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 53(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048765
Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D (2009) Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain 132(3):617–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
Shapiro PN, Penrod S (1986) Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychol Bull 100(2):139–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139
Smith RL, Rose AJ (2011) The “cost of caring” in youths’ friendships: considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Dev Psychol 47(6):1792–1803. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025309
Soble JR, Spanierman LB, Liao H-Y (2011) Effects of a brief video intervention on White university students’ racial attitudes. J Couns Psychol 58(1):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021158
Soenens B, Duriez B, Vansteenkiste M, Goossens L (2007) The intergenerational transmission of empathy-related responding in adolescence: the role of maternal support. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 33:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296300
Sporer SL (2001) Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: an integration of theories. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):36–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.36
Tuong W, Larsen ER, Armstrong AW (2014) Videos to influence: A systematic review of the effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. J Behav Med 37(2):218–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9480-7
Verdichevski M, Steeves JKE (2013) Own-age and own-sex biases in recognition of aged faces. Acta Psychol 144(2):418–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.005
Wiese H, Schweinberger SR (2018) Inequality between biases in face memory: event-related potentials reveal dissociable neural correlates of own-race and own-gender biases. Cortex 101:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.016
Wiese H, Komes J, Schweinberger SR (2013) Ageing faces in ageing minds: a review on the own-age bias in face recognition. Vis Cogn 21(9–10):1337–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823139
Wright DB, Sladden B (2003) An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychol 114(1):101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00052-0
Wright DB, Stroud JN (2002) Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age. Law Hum Behav 26(6):641–654. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020981501383
Wright DB, Boyd CE, Tredoux CG (2003) Inter-racial contact and the own-race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England. Appl Cogn Psychol 17:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.898
Young SG, Hugenberg K, Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF (2009) Interracial contexts debilitate same-race face recognition. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Photo of the educational video screen shot and target in a Silver Alert and screen capture of video of missing male
Educational video: 2.34 min
Silver Alert
Screen capture of target in a video outside
Appendix 2. Target and sample foil photo examples
Appendix 3. Contact with Older Adults Scale
Below is a list of different age groups. We would like to know about your experiences with members of those groups. For each group, indicate how much experience you have interacting with those age groups in the past 5 years.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gier, V.S. Recognition of a Missing Person in a Mock Silver Alert in Relation to Individual Difference Factors and the Effect of an Educational Video. J Police Crim Psych 34, 270–284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09332-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09332-7