Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Affecting Recognition of Senior Citizens in a Silver Alert

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigated the recognition of faces of senior citizens in the context of a Silver Alert. Literature on face recognition and eyewitness identification has consistently found recognition failure due to factors such as Own-Age Bias, the Other-Race Effect, and Own-Gender Bias. Participants viewed a video of people in a naturalistic setting, a park. The target, an elderly woman, wore either typical clothing or atypical clothing (nightgown), was not present or was not present but replaced with a different senior. We measured accuracy, confidence, reaction time, and Prediction-of-Knowing in relation to type of clothing worn by the target as well as age, race, and gender of participants. We hypothesized that recognition of the target senior would be low but would be higher when the woman appeared in a nightgown (matching the stereotype of an individual with dementia) as compared to typical clothing. We did not find age, race, and gender effects on target recognition. We offer possible explanations for both significant and non-significant results as they apply to the unique population of missing elderly adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFA (2012) America's Alzheimer's Foundation/report link. http://www.alzfdn.org/documents/Lost&Found_forweb.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  • Ahmed M, Megreya AM, Bindemann M (2013) Individual differences in personality and face identification. J Cognit Psychol 25:30–37. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.739153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algase DL, Moore HC, Vandeweerd C, Gavin-Dreschnack DJ (2007) Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging Ment Health 11:686–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi J, Rhodes M (2005) An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1043–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2006) Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition. N Am J Psychol 8:237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • ASAC (2012) American Silver Alert Coalition. https://silveralertbill.com/. Accessed 10 Aug 2016

  • ASAC (2015) American Silver Alert Coalition https://silveralertbill.com/. Accessed 10 Apr 2016

  • Bartlett JC, Fulton A (1991) Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age. Mem Cogn 19:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass E, Rowe MA, Moreno M (2007) The Alzheimer Association’s safe return program for persons who wander. In: Nelson A, Algase DL (eds) Evidence-based protocols for managing wandering behaviors. Springer, New York, pp 251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehal N, Mitchell F, Wade J (2003) Lost from view. The Policy Press, Bristol, Retrieved on September 17, 2003 http://justicefornatfraser.webs.com/documents/IS4%20Missing%20Adults%20(1).pdf

  • Bindemann M, Brown C, Koyas T, Russ A (2012) Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. J Appl Res Memory Cognit 1:96–103. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindemann M, Attard, Johnston RA (2014a) Perceived ability and actual recognition accuracy for unfamiliar and famous faces. Cognitive Sci Neurosci 1. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2014.986903

  • Bindemann M, Attard J, Johnston RA (2014b) Perceived ability and actual recognition accuracy for unfamiliar and famous faces. Cogent Psychol 1(1):986903. doi:10.1080/23311908.2014.986903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen ME, McKenzie B, Steis M, Rowe M (2011) Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 6:406–412. doi:10.1159/000329792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield AL, Wells GL, Olson EA (2002) The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy. J Appl Psychol 87:112–120. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce V, Young A (1986) Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol 77:305–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce MS, Dodson (2013) Cross-age effect in recognition performance and memory monitoring for faces. Psychol Aging 28:87–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AM, Miller P, Bruce V, Hancock PJB, Henderson Z (2001) Human and automatic face recognition: A comparison across image format. Vis Res 41:3185–3195

  • Burton AM, White D, McNeill A (2010) The Glasgow face matching test. Behav Res Methods 42:286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr D, Muschert GW, Kinney J, Robbins E, Petonito G, Manning L, Brown JS (2010) Silver Alerts and the problem of missing adults with dementia. The Gerontologist 50:149–157. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr D, Muscher GW, Kinney J, Robbins E, Petonito G, Manning L, Brown JS (2013) Silver alerts and the problems of missing adults with dementia Silver alerts and the problems of missing adults with dementia. The Gerontologist 50(2):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia VM, Kuefner D, Picozzi M, Vescovo E (2009) Early experience predicts later plasticity for face processing. Psychol Sci 20:853–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling S, Martin D, Hellmann JH, Memon A (2009) Some witnesses are better than others. Personal Individ Differ 47:369–373. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner NC, He Y, Johnson MK (2011) Age and emotion effect how we look at a face: visual scan patterns differ for own-age versus other-age emotional faces. Cognit Emot 25:983–997. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.540817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltis K (2005) Society’s most vulnerable Under Surveillance: the ethics of tagging and tracking dementia patients with GPS technology: a comparative View. Oxford University Comparative L. Forum 3.oucif.iuscomp.org

  • Feingold CA (1914) The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. J Crim Law Police Sci 5:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gier V, Kreiner D (2009) Memory of children’s faces by adults: appearance does matter. Appl Cogn Psychol 23:972–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock K, Rhodes G (2008) Contact, inversion and the other-race effect in face recognition. Br J Psychol 99:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison V, Hole G (2009) Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition. Psychon Bull Rev 16:264–269. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz A, Lovén J (2013) Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic review. Vis Cogn 21:1306–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlitz A, Nilsson LG, Bäckman L (1997) Gender differences in episodic memory. Mem Cogn 25:801–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzer R, Tang MX, Devanand DP, Albert SM, Wegesin DJ, Marder K, Bell K, Albert M, Brandt J, Stern Y (2003) Psychopathological features in Alzheimer’s disease: course and relationship with cognitive status. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(7):953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hourihan KL, Benjamin AS, Liu X (2012) A cross-race effect in metamemory: predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race. J Appl Res Memory Cognit 1:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R, White D, Van Montfort X, Burton AM (2011) Variability of photos of the same face. Cognition 121(3):313–323. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001. Accessed 23 Mar 2016

  • Johnston RA, Edmonds AJ (2009) Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory 17:577–596. doi:10.1080/09658210902976969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kibayashi K, Shojo H (2003) Accidental fatal hypothermia in elderly people with Alzheimer’s disease. Med Sci Law 43:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney JM, Kunkel S, Chahal J, Whittington FJ (2014) Families, caregiving and community support systems. In: Kunkel S, Brown JS, Whittington FG (eds) Global aging: Comparative perspectives on aging and the life course. Springer, New York, pp 157–158

  • Kwak J, Salmon JR, Acquaviva K, Brandt K, Egan K (2007) Benefits of training family caregivers on experiences of closure during end-of-life care. J Pain Symptom Manag 33:434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen JM, Arnal JD, Adams J, Courtney K, Hicks JL (2011) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychol Crime Law. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.499873

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen JM, Peters CS, Gier V, Sweeney LN (2013) The psychology of the missing: missing and abducted children. Holliday R & Marche T (Eds.). Child Forensic Psychology. Palgrave MacMillan

  • Leopold DA, Rhodes G (2010) A comparative view of face perception. J Comp Psychol 124:233–251, doi:10.1037/a0019460

  • Lewin C, Herlitz A (2002) Sex differences in face recognition in women’s faces make the difference. Brain Cogn 50:121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay DS, Read JD, Sharma K (1998) Accuracy and confidence in person identification: the relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychol Sci 9:215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovén J, Herlitz A, Rehnman J (2011) Women’s own-gender bias in face recognition memory: the role of attention at encoding. Exp Psychol 58:333–340. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovén J, Rehnman J, Wiens S, Lindholm T, Peira N, Herlitz A (2012) Who are you looking at? The influence of face gender on visual attention and memory for own- and other-race faces. Memory 20:321–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Megreya AM, Burton AM (2006) Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task. Mem Cogn 34(4):865–876. doi:10.3758/BF03193433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megreya AM, Burton AM (2008) Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). J Exp Psychol Appl 14(4):364–372. doi:10.1037/a0013464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Memon A, Gabbert F (2003) Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help? J Appl Psychol 88:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mian JF, Mondloch CJ (2012) Recognizing identity in the face of change: the development of an expression-independent representation of facial identity. J Vision. 12. doi: 10.1167/12.7.17

  • National Association of State Units on Aging (2011). http://www.nasuad.org/documentation/nasuad_materials/NASUAD%20States%20Survey%202011.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2016

  • National Council for Missing Persons http://www.ncmissingpersons.org/category/alerts/

  • National Silver Alert Program (2011) Retrieved from http://nationalsilveralert.org/silveralert.htm. Accessed 6 Apr 2016

  • Palmer MA, Brewer N, Horry R (2013) Understanding gender bias in face recognition: effects of divided attention at encoding. Acta Psychol 142:362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect TJ, Harris LJ (2003) Adult age differences in unconscious transference: source confusion or identity blending? Mem Cogn 31:570–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petonito G, Muschert GW, Carr DC, Kinney JM, Robbins EJ, Brown JS (2013) Programs to locate missing and critically wandering elders: a critical review and a call for multiphasic evaluation. The Gerontologist 53(1):17–25. doi:10.1093/geront/gns060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Project Lifesaver International (2012) http://www.projectlifesaver.org/what-we-do/. Accessed 15 Mar 2016

  • Rhodes MG, Anastasi JS (2012) The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 138:146–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Ewing L, Hayward WG, Maurer D, Mondloch CJ, Tanaka JW (2009) Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. Br J Psychol 100:717–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes MG, Sitzman DM, Rowland CA (2013) Monitoring and control of learning own-race and other-race faces. Appl Cogn Psychol 27:553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie KL, Smith FG, Jenkins R, Bindemann M, White D, Burton M (2015) Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: explaining the photo-ID paradox. Cognition 141:161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roark DA, Toole A, Abdi H (2003) Human recognition of familiar and unfamiliar people in naturalistic video. Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures, 2003. AMFG 2003. IEEE International Workshop, 36-41

  • Rowe MA, Bennett VA (2003) A look at deaths occurring in persons with dementia lost in the community. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Dementias 18:343–348. doi:10.1177/153331750301800612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe MA, Glover JC (2001) Antecedents, descriptions, and consequences of wandering in cognitively-impaired adults and the Safe Return (SR) program. Am J Alzheimers Disord Other Dementia 16(6):344–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe MA, Vandeveer SS, Greenblum CA, List CN, Femandez RM, Mixon NE, Ahn HC (2011) Persons with dementia missing in the community: is it wandering or something unique?. BMC Geriat 11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-28

  • Schweinberger A, Burton A, Kelly SW (1999) Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: experiments with morphed faces. Percept Psychophys 61, ll02–1115

  • Semmler C, Brewer N, Wells G (2004) Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. J Appl Psychol 89:334–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro PN, Penrod S (1986) Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychol Bull 100:139–156. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VL, Kassin SM, Ellsworth PC (1989) Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within-versus between-subjects correlations. J Appl Psychol 74:356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Gao X, Han S (2010) Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study. Brain Res 1327:69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine T (1991) A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol 2:161–204. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine T, Endo M (1992) Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Q J Exp Psychol 4:671–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster M, MacLeod D (2011) Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 3:1702–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wick JY, Zanni GR (2006) Aimless excursions: wandering in the elderly. Consult Pharm 21:608–612–615–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Hayward WG, B¨ulthoff I (2014) Face format at encoding affects the other-race effect in face memory. J Vis 14:1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mississippi State University, Meridian, MS, USA

    Vicki S. Gier

  2. University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, USA

    David S. Kreiner

  3. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA

    James M. Lampinen

Authors
  1. Vicki S. Gier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David S. Kreiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James M. Lampinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki S. Gier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gier, V.S., Kreiner, D.S. & Lampinen, J.M. Factors Affecting Recognition of Senior Citizens in a Silver Alert. J Police Crim Psych 32, 185–196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation