Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

AMBER Alerts: Are School-Type Photographs the Best Choice for Identifying Missing Children?

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated how well adults could recognize the faces of children when they differed in appearance from photographs shown in an alert. College students in three studies saw a mock AMBER Alert while watching a television show. The children appeared either well-groomed with positive affect (as in a school photograph) or disheveled with poor affect (as abducted children might appear). Recognition accuracy and confidence were significantly lower when the faces differed in appearance from the alert displayed during the television show. Thus, AMBER Alerts may be more effective if they are accompanied by more than one type of photograph of a missing child, particularly if a photograph is shown in which the child does not appear well-groomed and happy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-based bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1043–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger I (1999) The influence of advertising frequency on attitude-behavior consistency: a memory based analysis. J Soc Behav Pers 14:547–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Best J (1990) Threatened children: rhetoric and concern about child-victims. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluck S, Li K (2001) Predicting memory completeness and accuracy: emotion and exposure in repeated autobiographical recall. Appl Cogn Psychol 10:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt M, McAllister H (2009) Mug shot exposure effects: does size matter? Law Hum Behav 33:175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer N, Wells G (2006) The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. J Exp Psychol Appl 12:11–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer N, Caon A, Todd C, Weber N (2006) Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law Hum Behav 30:31–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham J, Malpass R (1995) The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. J Soc Issues 41:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J (1997, November 13) Groups take missing person search to the web. Wired News. Retrieved February 17, 2010, from http://www.wired-vig.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,8513,00.html

  • Bruce J, Beard K, Tedford S, Harman M, Tedford K (1997) African Americans’ and Caucasian Americans’ recognition and likability responses to African American and Causian American faces. J Gen Psychol 124:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce V, Henderson Z, Greenwood K, Hancock P, Burton A, Miller P (1999) Verficiation of face identities from images captured on video. J Exp Psychol Appl 5:339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiroro P, Valentine T (1995) An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol 48A: 879–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois M, Mueller J (1981) Target and distracter typicality in facial recognition. J Appl Psychol 66:639–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler B, Penrod S, Martens (1987) The reliability of eyewitness identification: the role of system and estimator variables. Law Hum Behav 11:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher K, Loftus E (1982) Do jurors share common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law Hum Behav 6:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice (2003) Fact sheet: project act. Retrieved on February 15, 2010. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2003/April/03_ag_266.htm

  • Department of Justice (2004) Report to the White House on AMBER Alert. Retrieved February 2, 2010 from http://www.amberAlert.gov/docs/AMBERWHReport.pdf

  • Department of Justice (2005) AMBER alert plans in place in all 50 states. Department of Justice observes anniversary of AMBER alert program. Retrieved on February 14, 2010. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/archives/pressreleases/2005/OJJDP05008.htm

  • Dunning D, Perretta S (2002) Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10–12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identification. J Appl Psychol 87:951–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold C (1914) The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. J Crim Law Police Sci 5:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson D, Rhodes G, Lee K (2001) ‘They all look alike to me’: prejudice and cross-race face recognition. Br J Psychol 92:567–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles R, Pichler A, Dutton K (2000) Facial expressions of emotions: are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cogn Emot 14:61–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton A, Bartlett JC (1991) Young and old faces in young and old heads: The factor of age in face recognition. Psychol Aging 6:623–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Gier V, Kreiner D (2009) Memory of children’s faces by adults: appearance does matter. Appl Cogn Psychol 23:972–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen C, Hansen R (1988) Finding the face in the crowd: an ager superiority effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harder K, Bloomfield J (2003) AMBER Alert Program prompts research on changeable message signs. Retrieved February 17, 2010 from http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchENews/2003/05/index.html#amber

  • Henderson Z, Bruce V, Burton A (2001) Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Appl Cogn Psychol 15:445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley W, Hemsworth D, Consoli A (1999) Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Mem Cogn 27:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins P (1998) Moral panic: changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebbell M, Hurren E, Roberts S (2006) Mock-suspects’ decisions to confess: the accuracy of eyewitness evidence is critical. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuefner D, Cassia V, Picozzi M, Bricolo E (2008) Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age-effect in adults. J Exp Psychol 34:811–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont A, Stewart-Williams S, Podd J (2005) Face recognition and aging: effects of target age and memory load. Mem Cogn 33:1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen J, Arnal J, Hicks J (2009) The effectiveness of supermarket posters in helping to find missing children. J Interpers Violence 24:406–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen J, Arnal J, Adams J, Courtney K, Hicks J (2011) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychol Crime Law 1477–2744

  • Leppanen J, Hietanen J (2003) Affect and face perception: odors modulate recognition advantage of happy faces. Emotion 3:315–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leppanen J, Hietanen (2004) Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? Psychol Res 69:22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus E (1996) Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus E (2005) Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learn Mem 12:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Megreya A, Burton M (2006) Recognising faces seen alone or with others: when two heads are worse than one. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:957–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner C, Treduoux C, Parker J, MacLin O (2005) Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Mem Cogn 33:783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger M (2006) Face distinctiveness and dlayed testing: differential effects on performance and confidence. J Gen Psychol 133:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger M, Bridges K (2004) Spectacles, distinctiveness, and face recognition: a webbased experiment. Cyberpsychol Behav 7:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Caldara R, Rossion B (2006) Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Vis Cogn 14:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M, Clinkinbeard S (2006) Improving the AMBER Alert system: psychology research and policy recommendations. Law Psychol Rev 30:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M, Griffin T, Clinkinbeard S, Thomas R (2009) The psychology of AMBER Alert: Unresolved issues and implications. Soc Sci J 46:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munsterberg H (1908) On the witness stand. Doubleday, Page & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Resources for parents and guardians. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from rhttp://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=200

  • Patterson K, Baddeley A (1977) When face recognition fails. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 4:406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrod S, Kurosawa K (2008) Eyewitness errors: assessing their extent, causes, and solutions. Jpn J Psychol 7:36–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfect TJ (2004) The role of self-rated ability in confidence judgments for eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Appl Cogn Psychol 18:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect TJ, Harris LJ (2003) Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? Mem Cogn 31(4):570–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter R, Brewer, N (1999). Perceptions of witness behaviour-accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Roark D, Spence M, Abdi H, O’Toole A (2003) Memory for moving faces: psychological and neural perspectives on the role of motion in face recognition. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2:15–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli S, Pallier C, Argenti A, Ventureya V, de Schonen S (2005) Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol Sci 16:440–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak A, Finkelhor D, Hammer H, Schultz D (2002) National estimates of missing children: an overview. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved on February 17, 2009, http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196465.pdf

  • Sporer S (2001) Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: an integration of theories. Psychol Public Policy Law 7:36–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporer SL, Malpass RS, Koehnken G (1996) (eds) Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ

  • Walmart Corporation (2001) Wal-Mart’s missing children’s boards result in 18 recoveries in 2001. http://walmartstores.com/FactsNews/NewsRoom/4359.aspx

  • Wells G, Loftus E (1984) Eyewitness research: Then and now. In: Wells G, Loftus E (eds) Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells G, Olson E (2003) Eyewitness testimony. Annu Rev Psychol 54:277–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham LHV, Morris PE, Fritz CO (2000) Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition. Br J Psychol 91:99–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaragoza M, Lane S (1994) Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20:934–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mississippi State University, 1000 Hwy 19 North, Meridian, MS, 39305, USA

    Vicki Silvers Gier & William Jason Hudnell

  2. University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO, USA

    David S. Kreiner & William Jason Hudnell

Authors
  1. Vicki Silvers Gier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David S. Kreiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William Jason Hudnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki Silvers Gier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gier, V.S., Kreiner, D.S. & Hudnell, W.J. AMBER Alerts: Are School-Type Photographs the Best Choice for Identifying Missing Children?. J Police Crim Psych 27, 9–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation