Skip to main content
Log in

Strain analysis of buried steel pipelines across strike-slip faults

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing analytical methods of buried steel pipelines subjected to active strike-slip faults depended on a number of simplifications. To study the failure mechanism more accurately, a refined strain analytical methodology was proposed, taking the nonlinear characteristics of soil-pipeline interaction and pipe steel into account. Based on the elastic-beam and beam-on-elastic-foundation theories, the position of pipe potential destruction and the strain and deformation distributions along the pipeline were derived. Compared with existing analytical methods and three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis, the maximum axial total strains of pipe from the analytical methodology presented are in good agreement with the finite element results at small and intermediate fault movements and become gradually more conservative at large fault displacements. The position of pipe potential failure and the deformation distribution along the pipeline are fairly consistent with the finite element results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GU Xiao-ting, ZHANG Hong. Research on aseismatic measures of gas pipeline crossing a fault for strain-based design [C]// Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference 2009. Prague, Czech Republic: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010: 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  2. JIAO Zhong-liang, SHUAI Jian, HAN Ke-jiang. Response analysis of buried pipeline subjected to fault movements [C]// International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology 2009: Advances and Experiences with Pipelines and Trenchless Technology for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Applications. Shanghai, China: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009: 1212–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LIU Ming, WANG Yong-yi, YU Zhi-feng. Response of pipelines under fault crossing [C]// Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2008: 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ZHU Qing-jie, CHEN Yan-hua, LIU Ting-quan, DAI Zhao-li. Finite element analysis of fluid-structure interaction in buried liquid-conveying pipeline [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15(Suppl. 1): 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NEWMARK N M, HALL W J. Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement [C]// Proceedings of US Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1975: 416–425.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KENNEDY R P, CHOW A W, WILLIAMSON R A. Fault movement effects on buried oil pipeline [J]. Transportation Engineering Journal, 1977: 617–633.

  7. WANG L R L, YEH Y H. A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1985, 13: 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KARAMITROS D K, BOUCKOVALAS G D, KOURETZIS G P. Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 27: 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. HA D, ABDOUN T H, O’ROURKE M J. Soil-pipeline interaction behavior under strike-slip faulting [C]// Proceedings of the Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV Congress 2008. Sacramento, CA, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. WIJEWICKREME D, KARIMIAN H, HONEGGER D. Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to relative axial soil movement [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(7): 735–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. COCCHETTI G, DI P C, GALLI A, NOVA R. Soil-pipeline interaction along unstable slopes: A coupled three-dimensional approach: Part 1. Theoretical formulation [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1289–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FREDJ A, DINOVITZER A, ZHOU J. A 3-dimentional continuum ale model for soil-pipe interaction [C]// Proceedings of the ASME International Pipeline Conference-2008. Calgary, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2009: 905–915.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Lifeline Alliance. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe [S]. America: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2001: 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ADINA theory and modeling guide. Volume I: ADINA [M]. Watertown, USA: ADINA R&D, Inc, 2004: 147–165.

  15. SURESH R D, SUDHIR K J. IITK-GSDMA-EQ33-V2.0, Guidelines for seismic design of buried pipeline [S]. Kanpur, India: Authority Gujarat State Disaster Management, 2002: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PetroChina Pipeline Company, Ocean University of China. SY/T 0450-2004, Code for seismic design of oil and gas steel pipeline [S]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, 2004: 27–29. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Li  (李昕).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50439010) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(DUT10ZD201) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, B., Li, X. & Zhou, J. Strain analysis of buried steel pipelines across strike-slip faults. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 18, 1654–1661 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0885-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0885-1

Key words

Navigation