Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Confucian Democrats, Not Confucian Democracy

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The notion that if democracy is to flourish in East Asia it must be realized in ways that are compatible with East Asian’s Confucian norms or values is a staple conviction of Confucian scholarship. I suggest two reasons why it is unlikely and even undesirable for such a Confucianized democracy to emerge. First, 19th- and 20th-century modernization swept away or weakened the institutions which had transmitted Confucian practices in the past, undermining claims that there is an enduring Confucian communitarian or cultural heritage today that democratic institutions have to adapt themselves to—or that a Confucian cultural spirit can be revived. Second, 20th-century East Asian statist regimes rationalized Confucianism for national ideologies meant to bind their citizens’ loyalties to developmentalist goals. Memories of this now delegitimized, statist Confucianism have contributed to the further marginalization of Confucian norms, and to their dissociation from democratic values, in today’s pluralistic democracies in East Asia. This essay argues that a Confucian conviction politics developed within the frame of East Asia’s actually existing liberal democracies provides a better course for advocates of Confucianism in democratic politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angle, Stephen. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwell, David. 2002. “Modernizing Tradition/Traditionalizing Modernity: Reflections on the Dhlomo-Vilakazi Dispute.” Research in Africa Literatures 33.1: 94–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, Michael. 2010. “Harmony, Conformity or Timidity? Singapore’s Overachievement in the Quest for Harmony.” In Governance for Harmony in Asia and Beyond, edited by Julia Tao, Anthony B. L. Cheung, Martin Painter, and Chenyang Li. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2010. China’s New Confucianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2015. The China Model and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2016. “In Trump’s America, You Can’t Lecture China Anymore.” Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/in-trump-s-america-you-can-t-lecture-china-any-more/ (last accessed on February 20, 2020).

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 1996. The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and Their History. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billioud, Sebastien, and Joel Thoroval. 2014. The Sage and the People: The Confucian Revival in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Model for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Serina. 2011. The Thought of MouZongsan. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Kyung-sup, and Song Min-young. 2010. “The Stranded Individualizer under Compressed Modernity: South Korean Women in Individualization without Individualism.” British Journal of Sociology 61.3: 539–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Allen. 2018. Forget Chineseness: On the Geopolitics of Cultural Identification. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Soonok. 2003. They are Not Machines: Korean Women Workers and Their Fight for Democratic Trade Unionism in the 1970s. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, David. 2015. Democracy in Contemporary Confucian Philosophy. London: Routledge.

  • Englehart, Neil. 2000. “Rights and Culture in the Asian Values Argument: The Rise and Fall of Confucian Ethics in Singapore.” Human Rights Quarterly 22.2: 548–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, Joel, and Christopher Soper. 2013. Confucianism, Democratization and Human Rights in Taiwan. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, Chunsong. 2015. “The Decline of China’s Examination System and the Disintegration of Institutionalized Confucianism.” China Review. http://www.china-review.com/sao.asp?id=2083 (last accessed on October 5, 2015).

  • Guo, Yingjie. 2003. Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1999. Democracy of the Dead. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Baogang. 2017. “Persistent Conflicts between Confucianism and Democracy.” The Journal of Northeast Asian History 14.2: 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • In, Jae Lee. 2014. “Moral and Character Education in Korea.” In Handbook of Moral and Character Education, 2nd ed., edited by Larry P. Nucci, Darcia Narvaez, and Tobias Krettenauer,. London: Routledge.

  • Inoue, Tetsujirō 井上哲次郎. 1900. The Philosophy of the Japanese WangYangming School 日本陽明學派之哲學. Tokyo 東京: Fuzanbō 冨山房.

  • ______. 1919. Outline of a National Morality 国民道徳概論. Tokyo 東京: Sanseidō 三省堂.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Phillip. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and WangYangming. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, Rikki. 1996. Democracy in Post-war Japan: MaruyamaMasao and the Search for Autonomy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Dae-jung. 1994. “Is Culture Destiny?” Foreign Affairs 73.6: 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2016. Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2018. Democracy After Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Joachim. 2012. “Translating the Vocation of Man: Liang Qichao and the Body Politic in Republican China.” In Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought, edited by Martin J. Burke and Melvin Richter. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 2004. Mencius. London: Penguin.

  • Lee, Kwanhu. 2014. Political Legitimacy, Representation and Virtue. Unpublished PhD thesis. University College, London.

  • Lee, Ming-huei. 2008. “Wang Yangming’s Philosophy and Modern Theories of Democracy: A Reconstructive Interpretation.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.3: 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang. 2006. “The Confucian Ideal of Harmony.” Philosophy East and West 56.4: 583–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, James. 1864. “Federalist Number Ten.” In The Federalist, edited by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeham, John. 2005. “Indigenization Discourse in Taiwanese Confucian Revivalism.” In Cultural, Ethnic and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan, edited by John Makeham and A-chin Hsiau. New York: Palgrave.

  • Maruyama, Masao. 1961. Japanese Thought 日本の思想. Tokyo 東京: Iwanami Shoten 岩沼書店.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi-Jagger, Sheila. 1994. Narratives of Nation-building in Korea: A Geneology of Patriotism. London: Routledge.

  • Moon, Chung-in, and Jun Byung-joon. 2011. “Modernization Strategy: Ideas and Influences.” In The ParkChung Hee Era, edited by Byung-kook Kim and Ezra F. Vogel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Mou, Zongsan. 2014. Late Works of MouZongsan. Trans. by J. Clower. Leiden: Brill.

  • Mukand, Sharun, and Dani Rodrik. 2017. “The Political Economy of Liberal Democracy.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 6433, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/161872/1/cesifo1_wp6433.pdf (last accessed on May 14, 2018).

  • National Bureau of Statistics, China. 2017. 2017 Report on the Survey of Migrant Workers 2017 年農民工監測調查報告. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201804/t20180427_1596389.html (last accessed on November 8, 2018).

  • O’Dwyer, Shaun. 2019. Confucianism’s Prospects: A Reassessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramore, Kiri. 2016. Japanese Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 2000. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2006. Identity and Violence. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Gi-Wook. 2006. Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics and Legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, Masato. 2016. “The Rediscovery of Chinese Thought as ‘Philosophy’ in the Japanese Meiji Period.” Journal of International Philosophy 国際哲学研究 5: 321.

  • Tan, Sor-hoon. 2003. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Weiming. 1991. “Cultural China: The Periphery as the Center.” Daedalus 120.2: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wi, Jo Kang. 1997. Christ and Caesar in Modern Korea. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2009. The Chinese Path to Individualization. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2010. “The Changing Moral Landscape.” In Deep China: The Moral Life of the Person, edited by Arthur Kleinman, Yunxiang Yan, Jing Jun, Sing Lee, Everett Zhang, Pan Tianshu, Wu Fei, and Guo Jinhua. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Kwangsu. 2011a. “The Value of Literature.” Trans. by Jooyeon Rhee. Azalea: Journal of Korean Literature and Culture 7: 287–293.

  • ______. 2011b. “What is Literature?” Trans. by J. Rhee. Azalea: Journal of Korean Literature and Culture 7: 293–315.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun O’Dwyer.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Dwyer, S. Confucian Democrats, Not Confucian Democracy. Dao 19, 209–229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09719-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09719-y

Keywords

Navigation