Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aim to summarize the available literature on patients treated with robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) or laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) and compare the clinical outcomes between RBS and LBS. A systematic literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-four observational studies met our inclusion criteria, and 27 studies of 27,997 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between RBS and LBS regarding overall postoperative complications, major complications, the length of hospital stay, reoperation, conversion, and mortality. Nevertheless, RBS was burdened by longer operative times and higher hospital costs when compared with LBS. On the contrary, the incidence of anastomotic leak was lower in RBS than in LBS. Further studies with a longer follow-up are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collaboration NCDRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19· 2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1377–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brolin RE. Bariatric surgery and long-term control of morbid obesity. JAMA. 2002;288:2793–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weller WE, Rosati C. Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234:279–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Higgins J, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. 2008. 187–241.

  6. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surgical endoscopy. 2015.

  9. Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N. Laparoscopic, hybrid, and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benizri EI, Renaud M, Reibel N, et al. Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg. 2013;206:145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014;24:2031–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Curet MJ, Curet M, Solomon H, et al. Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic handsewn Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Robot Surg. 2009;3:75–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22:52–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1690–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyn-Sue JR, Winder JS, Kotch S, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice. J Robot Surg. 2016.

  16. Moon RC, Gutierrez JC, Royall NA, et al. Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg. 2016;26:1016–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parini U, Fabozzi M, Contul RB, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass performed with the Da Vinci intuitive robotic system: preliminary experience. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques. 2006;20:1851–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park CW, Lam ECF, Walsh TM, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scozzari G, Zanini M, Cravero F, et al. High incidence of trocar site hernia after laparoscopic or robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2890–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smeenk RM, van’t Hof G, Elsten E, et al. The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1266–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wood MH, Kroll JJ, Garretson B. A comparison of outcomes between the traditional laparoscopic and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. J Robot Surg. 2014;8:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques Part A. 2011;21:295–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elli E, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Sarvepalli S, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic sleeve gastrectomy: short- and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2015;25:967–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kannan U, Ecker BL, Choudhury R, et al. Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 103 consecutive cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:94–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Rabaza JR, et al. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1743–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vilallonga R, Manuel Fort J, Caubet E, et al. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative study with 200 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Villamere J, Gebhart A, Vu S, et al. Utilization and outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic general and bariatric surgical procedures at Academic Medical Centers. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1729–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Curet MJ. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2005;140:779–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, et al. Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35:637–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Buchs NC, Azagury DE, Pugin F, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: what approach? Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg: MRCAS. 2015.

  36. Schraibman V, Macedo AL, Epstein MG, et al. Comparison of the morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of obesity in Brazil. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2253–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;252:254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:414–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2180–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2011;7:393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2003;17:212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zacharoulis D, Sioka E, Papamargaritis D, et al. Influence of the learning curve on safety and efficiency of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Gonzalez O, et al. The initial learning curve for robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy: a surgeon’s experience while introducing the robotic technology in a bariatric surgery department. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012. 2012.

  45. Baptista V, Wassef W. Bariatric procedures: an update on techniques, outcomes and complications. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013;29:684–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sgarbura O, Vasilescu C. The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, et al. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:701–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

My deepest gratitude goes to Professor Pin Zhang for her constant encouragement and guidance. Without his consistent and illuminating instruction, this study could not have reached its present form. This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan’an Road, JingAn District, Shanghai, 200040, China

    Kun Li & Jianxiong Tang

  2. Department of Nephrology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Jianan Zou

  3. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China

    Jianzhong Di, Xiaodong Han & Pin Zhang

Authors
  1. Kun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianan Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianxiong Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianzhong Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaodong Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Kun Li and Jianan Zou contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Zou, J., Tang, J. et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OBES SURG 26, 3031–3044 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2408-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2408-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation