Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated response of intercropped maize and potatoes to heterogeneous nutrients and crop neighbours

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

In communities, plants often simultaneously interact with intra- and inter-specific neighbours and heterogeneous nutrients. How plants respond under these conditions and then affect the structure and function of communities remain important questions.

Methods

Maize (Zea mays L.) was intercropped with potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). In the field experiment, we applied fertilizer both homogeneously and heterogeneously under monocropping and intercropping conditions. The heterogeneous nutrient treatment in intercropping was designed with different fertilizer placements, at intraspecific and interspecific rows, respectively. In the pot experiment, crops were grown under both homogeneous and heterogeneous nitrogen conditions with single plant, intraspecific and interspecific competition. Shoot and root biomass and yield were measured to analyse crop performance.

Results

In the field experiment, the heterogeneous nitrogen, compared with the homogenous one, enhanced the performance of the intercropped crop. Importantly, this effect of heterogeneous nitrogen was greater when fertilizer was applied at interspecific rows, rather than at intraspecific rows. Moreover, in pot experiments, the root foraging precision of the two crops was increased by interspecific neighbours, but only that of potatoes was increased by intraspecific neighbours.

Conclusions

The integrated responses of plants to heterogeneous neighbours and nutrients depend on the position of nutrient-rich patches, which deepen our understanding of the function of plant diversity, and show that fertilizer placement within multi-cropping systems merits more attention. Moreover, the enhanced utilization of heterogeneous nitrogen could drive overyielding in multi-cropping systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Dalain SA (2009) Effect of intercropping of Zea mays with potato Solanum Tuberosum, L. on potato growth and on the productivity and land equivalent ratio of potato and Zea mays. Agr J 4:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton AP, Fullen MA, Mitchell DJ, Hocking TJ, Liu L, Wu BZ, Zheng Y, Xia ZY (2004) Effects of soil conservation measures on erosion rates and crop productivity on subtropical Ultisols in Yunnan Province, China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 104:343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt MV, Khandelwal A, Dudley SA (2010) Kin recognition, not competitive interactions, predicts root allocation in young Cakile edentula seedling pairs. New Phytol 189:1135–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrough CJ, Caldwell MM (1995) The effects of shading and N status on root proliferation in nutrient patches by the perennial grass Agropyron desertorum in the field. Oecologia 103:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill JF Jr, McNickle GG, Haag JJ, Lamb EG, Nyanumba SM, St Clair CC (2010) Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science 328(5986):1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Mahall BE (2007) Family roots. Nature 448:145–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE, Weaver J, Hanson H (1926) Plant competition: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés-Avizanda A, Jovani R, Carrete M, Donázar JA (2012) Resource unpredictability promotes species diversity and coexistence in an avian scavenger guild: a field experiment. Ecology 93:2570–2579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day KJ, Hutchings MJ, John EA (2003) The effects of spatial pattern of nutrient supply on yield, structure and mortality in plant populations. J Ecol 91:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H (2007) How do roots interact? Science 318:1562–1563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H, Hendriks M, van Ruijven J, Ravenek J, Padilla FM, Jongejansnn E, Visser EJW, Mommer L (2012) Root responses to nutrients and soil biota: drivers of species coexistence and ecosystem productivity. J Ecol 100:6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley SA, File AL (2007) Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol Lett 3:435–438

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Vignes M, McKenzie BM, White PJ (2002) The detection of neighbors by plants. Plant Cell Environ 33:358–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema CH, Wardle DA (2002) Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 17:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Gao X, Deng Y, Chen X, Liao H (2011) Crop root behavior coordinates phosphorus status and neighbors: from field studies to three-dimensional in situ reconstruction of root system architecture. Plant Physiol 155:1277–1285

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garbin ML, Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR (2006) Soil patches of inorganic nitrogen in subtropical Brazilian plant communities with Araucaria angustifolia. Plant Soil 286:323–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Gallardo A (2011) Soil nutrient heterogeneity modulates ecosystem responses to changes in the identity and richness of plant functional groups. J Ecol 99:551–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Genung MA, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2012) Welcome to the neighbourhood: interspecific genotype by genotype interactions in Solidago influence above- and belowground biomass and associated communities. Ecol Lett 15:65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A (2003) Plant nitrogen capture from organic matter as affected by spatial dispersion, interspecific competition and mycorrhizal colonization. New Phytol 157:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A (2012) Plant root interactions. Biocommunication of Plants. Signal Commun Plants 14:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999a) Nitrogen capture by plants grown in N-rich organic patches of contrasting size and strength. J Exp Bot 50:1243–1252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Stewart J, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999b) Plant, soil fauna and microbial responses to N-rich organic patches of contrasting temporal availability. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1517–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999c) Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant Cell Environ 22:811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH (2001) An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 413:297–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ, John EA, Wijesinghe DK (2003) Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities. Ecology 84:2322–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J Ecol 81:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe PA (2000) The replacement series. J Ecol 88:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Shiojiri K (2010) Identity recognition and plant behavior. Plant Signal Behav 5:854–855

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kembel SW, De Kroon H, Cahill JF Jr, Mommer L (2008) Improving the scale and precision of hypotheses to explain root foraging ability. Ann Bot 101:1259–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT (2010) Close relatives are bad news. Nature 466:698–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sun J, Zhang F, Guo T, Bao X, Smith FA, Smith SE (2006) Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species. Oecologia 147:280–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lofton J, Weindorf DC, Haggard B, Tubana B (2010) Nitrogen variability: a need for precision agriculture. Agr J 5:6–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Reynolds JF (2007) Amount or pattern? Grassland responses to the heterogeneity and availability of two key resources. Ecology 88:501–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1991) Root communication among desert shrubs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:874–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee CS, Aarssen LW (2001) The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants: a review and critique of methodology. Plant Ecol 152:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midmore DJ, Berrios D, Roca J (1988) Potato (Solanum spp.) in the hot tropics V. Intercropping with maize and the influence of shade on tuber yields. Field Crop Res 18:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mommer L, van Ruijven J, Jansen C, van de Steeg HM, de Kroon H (2011) Interactive effects of nutrient heterogeneity and competition: implications for root foraging theory? Funct Ecol 26:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura R, Kachi N, Suzuki JI (2008) Root growth and plant biomass in Lolium perenne exploring a nutrient-rich patch in soil. J Plant Res 121:547–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien EE, Gersani M, Brown JS (2005) Root proliferation and seed yield in response to spatial heterogeneity of below-ground competition. New Phytol 168:401–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SS, Seabloom EW, Schimel JP (2012) Grassland community composition drives small-scale spatial patterns in soil properties and processes. Geoderma 170:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raventós J, Wiegand T, Luis MD (2010) Evidence for the spatial segregation hypothesis: a test with nine-year survivorship data in a Mediterranean shrubland. Ecology 91:2110–2120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Hodge A, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999) Plant root proliferation in nitrogen-rich patches confers competitive advantage. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka DR, Barrios-Masias FH, Hausmann NT, Jackson LE, Schachtman DP (2010) Tomato root transcriptome response to a nitrogen-enriched soil patch. BMC Plant Biol 10:75. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-75

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharaiha RK, Battikhi A (2002) A study on potato/corn intercropping-microclimate modification and yield advantages. Agric Sci 16:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Štěpána J, Janečkováb P, Lepšb J (2004) Influence of soil heterogeneity and competition on growth features of three meadow species. Flora 199:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Kahmen A, Klein AM, Buchmann N, Perner J, Tscharntke T (2008) Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biol 6:e122. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060122

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Enquist BJ, McGill BJ, Jiang L, Albert CH, Hulshof C, Jung V, Messier J (2012) The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wadman WP, Van Noordwijk M (1992) Effects of spatial variability of nitrogen supply on environmentally acceptable nitrogen fertilizer application rates to arable crops. Neth J Agr Sci 40:51–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Walch-Liu P, Ivanov II, Filleur S, Gan Y, Remans T, Forde BG (2006) Nitrogen regulation of root branching. Ann Bot 97:875–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW, Osiru D (1972) Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J Agr Sci 79:517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster CA, Mundt AC (2007) The effect of diversity and spatial arrangement on biomass of agricultural cultivars and native plant species. Basic Appl Ecol 8:521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248:305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China (No. 2011CB100402) and Modern Agricultural Industry & Technology System for Maize in Yunnan Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaixian Wu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nico Eisenhauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, B., Fullen, M.A., Li, J. et al. Integrated response of intercropped maize and potatoes to heterogeneous nutrients and crop neighbours. Plant Soil 374, 185–196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1865-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1865-z

Keywords

Navigation