Skip to main content
Log in

Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species

  • Ecosystem Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though ecologists and agronomists have considered the spatial root distribution of plants to be important for interspecific interactions in natural and agricultural ecosystems, few experimental studies have quantified patterns of root distribution dynamics and their impacts on interspecific interactions. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the relationship between root distribution and interspecific interactions between intercropped plants. Roots were sampled twice by auger and twice by the monolith method in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.)/maize intercropping and in sole wheat, maize, and faba bean up to 100 cm depth in the soil profile. The results showed that the roots of intercropped wheat spread under maize plants, and had much greater root length density (RLD) at all soil depths than sole wheat. The roots of maize intercropped with wheat were limited laterally, but had a greater RLD than sole-cropped maize. The RLD of maize intercropped with faba bean at different soil depths was influenced by intercropping to a smaller extent compared to maize intercropped with wheat. Faba bean had a relatively shallow root distribution, and the roots of intercropped maize spread underneath them. The results support the hypotheses that the overyielding of species showing benefit in the asymmetric interspecific facilitation results from greater lateral deployment of roots and increased RLD, and that compatibility of the spatial root distribution of intercropped species contributes to symmetric interspecific facilitation in the faba bean/maize intercropping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiku SGK, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Bajazet T (2001) Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize–cowpea mixture grown under greenhouse conditions. Plant Soil 235:85–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K (1990) Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science 248:477–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology, individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill JF (2003) Lack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species. J Ecol 91:532–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craine JM, Wedin DA, Chapin FS, Reich PB (2003) Relationship between the structure of root systems and resource use for 11 North American grassland plants. Plant Ecol 165:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1958) The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust J Agric Res 9:421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner DN, Davidson DG, Ghaffarzadeh M, Cruse RM (1999) Yields and returns from strip intercropping on six Iowa farms. Am J Altern Agric 14:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis CA (1986) Multiple cropping systems. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathumbi SM, Cadisch G, Buresh RJ, Giller KEG (2003) Subsoil nitrogen capture in mixed legume stands as assessed by deep nitrogen-15 placement. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:573–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golden Software Inc. (1994) Surface Mapping System SURFER version 5.01. Golden Software Inc., Golden

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea–barley intercrops—a field study employing P-32 technique. Plant Soil 236:63–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Qiu J, Bao X (1993) Time of nitrogen application in maize for spring wheat intercropped maize covered with plastic membrane. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica (in Chinese) 2:51–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Yang SC, Li XL, Zhang FS, Christie P (1999) Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean. Plant Soil 212:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sun JH, Zhang FS, Li XL, Yang SC, Rengel Z (2001a) Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping. I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res 71:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sun JH, Zhang FS, Li XL, Rengel Z, Yang SC (2001b) Wheat/maize or soybean strip intercropping. II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Res 71:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Zhang FS, Li XL, Christie P, Yang SC, Tang C (2003) Interspecific facilitation of nutrient uptakes by intercropped maize and faba bean. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 65:61–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lose SJ, Hilger TH, Leihner DE, Kroschel J (2003) Cassava, maize and tree root development as affected by various agroforestry and cropping systems in Bénin, West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manschadi AM, Sauerborn J, Stutzel H, Gobel W, Saxena MC (1998) Simulation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) root system development under Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron 9:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993a) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping—water. Field Crops Res 34:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993b) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping—non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crops Res 34:319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobel PS (1997) Root distribution and seasonal production in the northwestern Sonoran desert for a C3 subshrub, a C4 bunchgrass, and a CAM leaf succulent. Am J Bot 84:949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL (1982) Methods of soil analysis (Part 2), 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao IM, Borrero V, Ricaurte J, Garcia R (1999) Adaptive attributes of tropical forage species to acid soils. V. Differences in phosphorus acquisition from less available inorganic and organic sources of phosphate. J Plant Nutr 22:1175–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Golluscio RA, Lauenroth WK, Soriano A (1989) Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 81:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid I (2002) The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic Appl Ecol 3:339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Bengough AG, Engels C, van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, van de Geijn SC (2000) Root methods: a handbook. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern WR (1993) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems. Field Crops Res 34:335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuelpnagel R (1993) Intercropping of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with oats or spring wheat. Proceedings of the International Crop Science Congress, Iowa State University, Ames, July 1992, pp 14–44

  • Tennant D (1975) A test of a modified line intersection method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63:995–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Office of Soil Survey in Gansu (1993) Soils in Gansu. The China Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan CG, Yilmaz I, Sosebee RE (2002) Seasonal soil–water availability influences snakeweed, root dynamics. J Arid Environ 51:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Peltzer DA (2003) Interspecific interactions and biomass allocation among grassland plant species. Oikos 100:497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warembourg FR, Roumet C, Lafont F (2004) Interspecific control of non-symbiotic carbon partitioning in the rhizosphere of a grass–clover association: Bromus madritensisTrifolium angustifolium. J Exp Bot 55:743–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW (1979) Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr 32:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang FS, Li L, Sun JH (2001) Contribution of above- and below-ground interactions to intercropping. In: Horst WWJ, Schenk MK, Bürkert A, Claassen N, Flessa H, Frommer WB, Goldbach HE, Olfs HW, Römheld V, Sattelmacher B, Schmidhalter U, Schubert S, von Wirén N, Wittenmayer L (eds) Plant nutrition—food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support for the research from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project numbers 39670435 and 30070450). We thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, and the Australian Department of Science and Technology, as well as the China Higher Education Strategic Initiatives Program for funding that facilitated collaboration between the China Agricultural University and the University of Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Li.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F. et al. Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species. Oecologia 147, 280–290 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0256-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0256-4

Keywords

Navigation