Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single Muscle Surface EMGs Locomotion Identification Module for Prosthesis Control

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Surface EMG (sEMG) signals along with pattern recognition algorithms demonstrate a significant potential to identify and predict human motor activity. We propose a single-channel sEMG signalbased continuous locomotion identification method using a simple classifier. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated for three daily-life locomotion modes on a dataset of 15 subjects. A ranking-based feature selection method was applied to optimize the feature vector. The performance of the proposed method was compared comprehensively with intuitive feature vectors and principle component analysis (PCA). The mean top performances were shown by the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Neural Network (NN) classifiers as 98.65 ± 0.23, 98.42 ± 0.68, and 99.41 ± 0.51%, respectively (P > 0.05). Further, the subjectwise performance of individually trained classifiers (5 subjects) was accessed through the performance indices, namely classification accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F-score. The obtained results indicated no significant degradation and difference in the performance among subjects (P > 0.05). The encouraging results of the proposed method justify its possible use for efficient prosthesis control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Ziegler-Graham, E. J. MacKenzie, P. L. Ephraim, et al., “Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 89, No. 3, 422–429 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. R. Tucker, J. Olivier, A. Pagel, et al., “Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 12, 1–29 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Hu, E. Rouse, and L. Hargrove, “Fusion of bilateral lower-limb neuromechanical signals improves prediction of locomotor activities,” Front. Robot. AI, 5, 1–16 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Au, M. Berniker, and H. Herr, “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Netw., 21, No. 4, 654–666 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Winter and H. J. Yack, “EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 67, No. 5, 402–411 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. L. Grimes, “An active multi-mode above knee prosthesis controller,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1979).

  7. H. A. Varol, F. Sup, and M. Goldfarb, “Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 57, No. 3, 542–551 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. J. Young, A. M. Simon, N. P. Eey, and L. J. Hargrove, “Intent recognition in a powered lower limb prosthesis using time history information,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 42, No. 3, 631–641 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Chen, E. Zheng, and Q. Wang, “A locomotion intent prediction system based on multi-sensor fusion,” Sensors, 14, 12349–12369 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. Young, A. M. Simon, and L. J. Hargrove, “A training method for locomotion mode prediction using powered lower limb prostheses,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 22, No. 3, 671–677 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Huang, et al., “A foot-wearable interface for locomotion mode recognition based on discrete contact force distribution,” Mechatronics, 32, December, 12–21 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Yuan, Q. Wang, and L. Wang, “Fuzzy-logic-based terrain identification with multisensor fusion for transtibial amputees,” IEEE Trans. Mechatronics, 20, No. 2, 618-630 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Aggarwal, R. Gupta, and R. Agarwal, “Design and development of integrated insole system for gait analysis,” in: Eleventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) (2018), pp. 1–5.

  14. H. Huang, F. Zhang, L. J. Hargrove, et al., “Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular – mechanical fusion,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58, No. 10, 2867–2875 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. E. Joshi, D. Hahn, D. Joshi, et al., “Terrain and direction classification of locomotion transitions using neuromuscular and mechanical input,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 44, No. 4, 1275–1284 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. A. Spanias, A. M. Simon, K. A. Ingraham, and L. J. Hargrove, “Effect of additional mechanical sensor data on an EMG - based pattern recognition system for a powered leg prosthesis,” in: IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (2015), pp. 22–24.

  17. A. J. Young, T. A. Kuiken, and L. J. Hargrove, “Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses,” J. Neural Eng., 11, No. 5, 1–12 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Zhang and H. Huang, “Source selection for realtime user intent recognition toward volitional control of artificial legs,” IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Inform., 17, No. 5, 907–914 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. D. Miller, M. S. Beazer, and M. E. Hahn, “Myoelectric walking mode classification for transtibial amputees,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 60, No. 10, 2745–2750 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Du, F. Zhang, M. Liu, and H. Huang, “Toward design of an environment-aware adaptive locomotion-moderecognition system,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 59, No. 10, 2716–2725 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Yang, and H. Huang, “An Automatic and user-driven training method for locomotion mode recognition for artificial leg control,” in: 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (2012), pp. 6116–6119.

  22. M. T. Farrell and H. Herr, “A method to determine the optimal features for control of a powered lower-limb prostheses,” in: 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (2011), pp. 6041–6046.

  23. S. Pati, D. Joshi, and A. Mishra, “Locomotion classification using EMG signal,” in: 2010 International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies (2010), pp. 1–6.

  24. H. Huang, F. Zhang, Y. L. Sun, and H. He, “Design of a robust EMG sensing interface for pattern classification,” J. Neural Eng., 7, No. 5, 056005 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, “Continuous human locomotion identification for lower limb prosthesis control,” CSI Trans. ICT, 6, No. 1, 17–31 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. SENIAM, “Sensors location: Recommendations for sensor locations on individual muscles,” 2016. [Online available]: http://seniam.org/sensor_location.htm.

  27. R. Gupta and R. Agarwal, “Electromyographic signal driven continuous locomotion mode identification module design for lower limb prosthesis control,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 43, No. 12, 7817–7835 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Sokolova and G. Lapalme, “A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks,” Inf. Process. Manag., 45, No. 4, 427–437 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. J. Song, H. Y. Jiang, and J. Liu, “Feature selection based on FDA and F-score for multi-class classification,” Expert Syst. Appl., 81, 22–27 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. I. S. Dhindsa, R. Agarwal, and H. S. Ryait, “Principal component analysis-based muscle identification for myoelectric-controlled exoskeleton knee,” J. Appl. Stat., 44, No. 10, 1707–1720 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Chandrashekar and F. Sahin, “A survey on feature selection methods,” Comput. Electr. Eng., 40, No. 1, 16–28 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. S. Murley, H. B. Menz, and K. B. Landorf, “Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait,” J. Foot Ankle Res., 2, No. 1, 1–9 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Agarwal, R. Single Muscle Surface EMGs Locomotion Identification Module for Prosthesis Control. Neurophysiology 51, 191–208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09812-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09812-w

Keywords

Navigation