Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal Functioning in Society: A Conceptualization, a Measure, and a Look at Determinants

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research presents the conceptualization and validation of a new scale assessing a multidimensional perspective on well-being named “Optimal Functioning in Society” (OFIS; Vallerand, 2013). The concept of OFIS refers to high levels of psychological, physical, and relational well-being, high performance in one’s main field of endeavor, and contribution to society. Three studies conducted with workers (Study 1 & 3) and students (Study 2) supported the psychometric properties (i.e., factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, temporal consistency) of the OFIS scale. Further, two assessments of its nomological validity were conducted. In line with the Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2017), Study 2 showed that altogether the three basic psychological needs were positively related to optimal functioning. Further, based on the Dualistic Model of Passion (Vallerand, 2015), Study 3 investigated longitudinal associations between passion and optimal functioning, and showed a nuanced role of harmonious and obsessive passion in the promotion of optimal functioning. Finally, the OFIS scale was found to be invariant across occupations, age, gender, and relationship status. Altogether, results from these studies support the psychometric properties of the OFIS scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article is available upon request from the authors.

Notes

  1. We contemplated the possibility that romantic and non-romantic relationships would be represented as a single factor. However, none of the EFA solutions presented a pattern where they were combined. From an empirical standpoint, they seem to represent qualitatively different foci of social well-being.

  2. In Study 3, relationship status was only included at time 2. Thus, data from the second wave was used in the present analysis. Supplementary multigroup analyses comparing participants from Studies 1, 2, and 3 (T1) between occupations, genders, and age groups yielded identical conclusions. See the online supplement for the results.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was facilitated by grants from the Canada Research Chair, the Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and by the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC) awarded to the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the theoretical conception and design of this research. Data collection was performed by R.J.V., J.V.F., and L.A.C.-P., L.A.C.-P. performed the analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the revision and the improvement of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Léandre Alexis Chénard-Poirier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Consent to participate

Participants provided their informed consent to participate in this study.

Ethical approval

This research involved human participants and was reviewed and approved by the Comité institutionnel d’éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains de l’Université du Québec à Montréal

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 220 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chénard-Poirier, L.A., Vallerand, R.J., Verner-Filion, J. et al. Optimal Functioning in Society: A Conceptualization, a Measure, and a Look at Determinants. J Happiness Stud 24, 857–892 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00617-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00617-7

Keywords

Navigation