Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought is one of the major abiotic stresses affecting yield of dryland crops. Rhizobacterial populations of stressed soils are adapted and tolerant to stress and can be screened for isolation of efficient stress adaptive/tolerant, plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) strains that can be used as inoculants for crops grown in stressed ecosystems. The effect of inoculation of five drought tolerant plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. strains namely P. entomophila strain BV-P13, P. stutzeri strain GRFHAP-P14, P. putida strain GAP-P45, P. syringae strain GRFHYTP52, and P. monteilli strain WAPP53 on growth, osmoregulation and antioxidant status of maize seedlings under drought stress conditions was investigated. Drought stress induced by withholding irrigation had drastic effects on growth of maize seedlings. However seed bacterization of maize with Pseudomonas spp. strains improved plant biomass, relative water content, leaf water potential, root adhering soil/root tissue ratio, aggregate stability and mean weight diameter and decreased leaf water loss. The inoculated plants showed higher levels of proline, sugars, free amino acids under drought stress. However protein and starch content was reduced under drought stress conditions. Inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage compared to uninoculated seedlings under drought stress. As compared to uninoculated seedlings, inoculated seedlings showed significantly lower activities of antioxidant enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) under drought stress, indicating that inoculated seedlings felt less stress as compared to uninoculated seedlings. The strain GAP-P45 was found to be the best in terms of influencing growth and biochemical and physiological status of the seedlings under drought stress. The study reports the potential of rhizobacteria in alleviating drought stress effects in maize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ait Barka E, Nowak J, Clement C (2006) Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium; Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJn. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7246–7252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alami Y, Achouak W, Marol C, Heulin T (2000) Rhizosphere soil aggregation and plant growth promotion of sunflowers by exopolysaccharide producing Rhizobium sp. strain isolated from sunflower roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3393–3398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arora R, Pitchay DS, Bearce BC (1998) Water-stress-induced heat tolerance in geranium leaf tissues: a possible linkage through stress proteins? Physiol Plant 103:24–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asada K, Chen GX (1989) Ascorbate peroxidase in tea leaves: occurrence of two isozymes and differences in their enzymatic and molecular properties. Plant Cell Physiol 30:987–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli F, Burtin G, Herbillon AJ (1991) Disaggreration and clay dispersion of oxisols: Na resin, a recommended methodology. Geoderma 49:301–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1225–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates LS, Waldren RD, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu SK (1998) A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato. Am J Potato Res 75:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chanway CP, Holl FB (1994) Growth of out planted lodepole pine seedlings one year after inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Forest Sci 40:238–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Kurgan L, Rahbari M (2007) Prediction of protein crystallization using collocation of amino acid pairs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 355:764–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Close TJ (1996) Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Planta 97:795–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (2004) Water relations and yield in Azospirillum- inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Can J Bot 82:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekánková K, Luxová M, Gašparíková O, Kolarovič L (2004) Response of maize plants to water stress. Biologia 13:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Döbereiner J (1992) Recent changes in concepts of plant bacteria interactions: endophytic N2 fixing bacteria, vol 44. Cienc. Cult, São Paulo, pp 310–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric methods for determination of sugars of related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egamberdiyeva D, Hoflich G (2004) Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of cotton and pea in a semi-arid region of Uzbekistan. J Arid Environ 56:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enebak SA, Wei G, Kloepper JW (1997) Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly and slash pine seedlings. For Sci 44:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt LC, Janagoudar BS, Anthony P, Davey MR, Power JB, Lowe KC (2002) Salinity tolerance and antioxidant status in cotton cultures. Biol Med 33:502–511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free living bacteria. Can J of Microbiol 41:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbroff EB (1997) The effect of the plant growth promoting rhizobacteriaum Pseudomonas putida GR 12–2 on the development of canola seedlings subjected to various stresses. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1233–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway H, Munns R (1980) Mechanism of salt tolerance in non halophytes. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 31:149–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han HS, Lee KD (2005) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria effect on antioxidant status, photosynthesis, mineral uptake and growth of lettuce under soil salinity. J Agri Biolo Sci 1:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Guo Z (2005) Responses of antioxidative system to chilling stress in two rice cultivars differing in sensitivity. Biol Plant 49:81–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler J (2008) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify alleviation biochemical mechanisms in water-stressed plants. Funct Plant Biol 35:141–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarovits G, Norwak J (1997) Rhizobacteria for improvement of plant growth and establishment. Hort Science 32:188–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifshitz R, Kloepper JW, Scher FM, Tipping EM, Laliberte M (1986) Nitrogen-fixing pseudomonads isolated from roots of plants grown in the Canadian High Arctic. Appl Enviro Microbiolol 51:251–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maehly AC, Chance B (1959) The assay of catalase and peroxidases. In: Glick D (ed) Methods of biochemical analysis, vol 1. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp 357–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea JM, Azcón R (2007) Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought-tolerant or drought-sensitive Glomus species. Microb Ecol 54:543–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marulanda A, Azcón R, Ruíz-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2008) Differential effects of a Bacillus megaterium strain on Lactuca sativa plant growth depending on the origin of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus coinoculated: physiologic and biochemical traits. J Plant Growth Regul 27:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu BP (1998) Separation of sugars, polyols, proline analogues, and betaines in stressed plant extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography and quantification by ultra violet detection. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:793–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayer M, Reza H (2008) Drought-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in two maize varieties. World App Sci J 3:448–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Patakas A, Noitsakis B (2001) Leaf age effects on solute accumulation in water-stressed grapevines. Plant Physiol 158:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quan R, Shang M, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhang J (2004) Engineering of enhanced glycine betaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Biotechnol J 2:477–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson EB, Firestone MK (1992) Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in a Soil Pseudomonas sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1284–1291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Šafařík IVO, Šantrůčková H (1992) Direct determination of total soil carbohydrate content. Plant Soil 143:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhya V, Ali SKZ, Minakshi G, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B (2009) Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-P45. Biol Fertil Soils 46:17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simova-Stoilova L, Demirevska K, Petrova T, Tsenov N, Feller U (2008) Antioxidative protection in wheat varieties under severe recoverable drought at seedling stage. Plant Soil Environ 54:529–536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Yadav A, Seem K, Mishra S, Chaudhary V, Srivastava CS (2008) Effect of high temperature on Pseudomonas putida NBRI0987 biofilm formation and expression of stress sigma factor RpoS. Curr Microbiol 56:453–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teulat B, Zoumarou-Wallis N, Rotter B, Ben Salem M, Bahri H, This D (2003) QTL for relative water content in field-grown barley and their stability across Mediterranean environments. Theor Appl Genet 108:181–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timmusk S (2003) Mechanism of action of the plant growth promoting Bacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa.Comprehansive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 908, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala, Sweden pp 40

  • Timmusk S, Wagner EGH (1999) The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thalianan gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant-Microb Interact 12:951–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya A, Sankhla D, Davis TD, Sankhla N, Smith BN (1985) Effect of paclobutrazol on the activities of some enzymes of activated oxygen metabolism and lipid peroxidation in senscing soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 121:453–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voetberg GS, Sharp RE (1991) Growth of maize primary root at low water potential III. Roles of increased proline deposition in osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiol 96:1125–1230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xing H, Tan L, An L, Zhao Z, Wang S, Zhang C (2004) Evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in osmotic stress tolerance of wheat seedlings: Inverse correlation between leaf abscisic acid accumulation and leaf water loss. Plant Growth Regul 42:61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav SK, Jyothi Lakshmi N, Maheswari M, Vanaja M, Venkateswarlu B (2005) Influence of water deficit at vegetative, anthesis and grain filling stages on water relation and grain yield in sorghum. Indian J Plant Physiol 10:2–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN (1982) Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte system. Science 217:122–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1997) Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol 38:1095–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi for providing the financial assistance in the form of network project on Application of Microorganisms in Agriculture and Allied Sectors (AMAAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Venkateswarlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandhya, V., Ali, S.Z., Grover, M. et al. Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62, 21–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4

Keywords

Navigation