Abstract
A survey of genotypic responses to beneficial bacterium (Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN) was conductedin vitro andex vitro, under two temperature conditions, using eighteen clones of potato of different heat stress tolerance: temperate adapted cultivars Kennebec and Russet Burbank; heat tolerant DTO-2, DTO-28, DTO-33, LT-1, LT-2, LT-5, LT-6, LT-7, LT-8, LT-9, Y84-02, NDD277-2, Désirée, and Maine-47; and heat sensitive abscissic acid (ABA)-deficient mutants 11401-01 and 9120-05. Nodal explants taken from 6-week-old bacterized and non-bacterized control plantlets were culturedin vitro on a hormone-free potato nodal cutting medium, and placed at either 20/15 C or 33/25 C day/night temperature, 12h photoperiod and 250 µE m−2 s−1 mixture of fluorescent and incandescent light, for six weeks. The tuberization response was studiedex vitro after two weeks acclimation of 2-week old plantlets at 33/25C. The acclimated plantlets were transplanted to 3L plastic nursery pots containing peat-based Pro-Mix growing medium and placed in growth chambers at either 20/15 or 33/25 C day/night temperature, 12 h photoperiod, 475 μE m−2 s−1 light and ≈80% RH, for 12 weeks. Compared to the non-bacterized controls, bacterization significantly increased stem length of 12, shoot biomass of 9, and root biomass of 2 clones at 20/15C; and stem length of 14, shoot biomass of 15, and root biomass of 13 clones at 33/25C. High temperature increased length of internodes and had either no effect or slightly decreased node number. Temperature increase had the most dramatic effect on root development. An average shoot to root ratio decreased from 3.7 at 20/15 C to 1.7 at 33/25 C for non-bacterized plantlets and, respectively, from 4.3 to 1.5 for bacterized. The beneficial effect of bacterization on root biomass was the most pronounced in LT-1 and Maine-47 at 20/15 C and LT-8, Maine 47, DTO-2, Kennebec, NDD277-2 and 11401-01 at 33/25C. The temperature elevation did not significantly affect root biomass of LT-6, DTO-28 and Désirée. Temperature stress caused severe reduction in tuber number and tuber fresh weight. ABA-deficient mutants did not produce any tubers and LT-8, LT-9, Y84-027 and DTO-28 tuberized very poorly at 33/25C. DTO-33, Désirée, LT-1 and Kennebec gave the highest number of tubers per pot and Kennebec, LT-1, Désirée and LT-7 the highest yields at this temperature. There was no significant effect of bacterization on tuberization at 20/15 C but at 33/25 C bacterization significantly enhanced tuber number and weight in LT-7 and reduced tuber weight in DTO-2. Although there was no clear link between thein vitro response of particular clones to bacterization and their heat stress tolerance, improvement ofex vitro performance of heat tolerant LT-7 indicates that rhizosphere bacteria may play a role in clonal adaptation of potato to heat stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bensalim, S. 1997. Heat stress responses ofin vitro bacterized (Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN) and non-bacterized clones of potato (Solanum tuberosum L). M.Sc. Thesis, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Brown, M.E. 1974. Seed and root bacterization. Ann Rev Phytopathol 12:181–197.
Conn, K.L., J. Nowak, and G. I. azarovits. 1997. A gnotobiotic bioassay for studying interactions between potato and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Can J Microbio 143:801–808.
Dunbar, C. 1997. Utilization of seaweed extract and plant growth promoting rhizobacterium in greenhouse production of potato minitubers. M.Sc. Thesis, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ewing, E.E. 1995. The role of hormones in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuberization.In: “Plant hormones: Physiology, biochemist and molecular biology.” Edited by P.J. Davies. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, NL, 698–724.
Frommel, M.I., J. Nowak, and G. Lazarovits. 1991. Growth enhancement and developmental modifications ofin vitro grown potato (Solanum tuberosum spp.tuberosum) as affected by a non-fluorescentPseudomonas sp. Plant Physio 196:928–936.
Glick, B.R. 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. J Microbio 141:109–117.
Herman, E.B. 1987. “Contaminants” promote potato micropropagation. Agricell Report 9:38.
Kloepper, J.W., R. Lffshitz, and M.N. Schroth. 1988.Pseudomonas inoculants to benefit plant production. ISI Atlas of Science: Anim Plant Sci 1:60–64.
Lazarovits, G. and J. Nowak. 1997. Rhizobacteria for improvement of plant growth and establishment. HortScience 32:188–192.
Mendoza, H.A. and R.N. Estrada. 1979. Breeding potatoes for tolerance to stress: Heat and frost.In: “Stress Physiology in Crop Plants.” Edited by H. Mussel and R.C. Staples. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY, 227–262.
Menzel, C.M. 1985. Tuberization in potato at high temperatures: Inter-action between temperature and irradiance. Ann Bot 55:35–39.
Midmore, D.J. 1992. Potato production in the tropics.In: “The potato”. Edited by P. Harris. Chapmann and Hall, London, UK, 509–569.
Nowak, J. and D. Colborne. 1989.In vitro tuberization and tuber pro- teins as indicators of heat stress tolerance in potato. Am Potato J 66:35–45.
Nowak, J. and S.K. Asiedu. 1992. Gelling agent and light effects on in vitro tubeloation of potato cultivars. Am Potato J 69:461–470.
Nowak, J., S.K. Asiedu, G. Lazarovits, V. Pillay, A. Stewart, C. Smith, and V. Liu. 1995. Enhancement ofin vitro growth and transplant stress tolerance of potato and vegetable plantlets co-cultured with a plant growth promoting pseudomonad bacterium.In: “Ecophysiology and photosynthetic invitro cultures.” Edited by F. Carre and P. Chagvardieff, CEA, Aix-en-Provence, France,173–180.
Nowak, J., S.K. Asiedu, S. Bensalim, J. Richards, A. Stewart, C. Smith, D. Stevens, and AN. Sturz. 1997. From laboratory to applications: challenges and progress within vitro dual cultures of potato and beneficial bacteria.In: “Bacteria and bacteria-like contaminants of plant tissue culture.” Edited by A. Cassells. Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, NL (8 pages, in press).
Pillay, V. and J. Nowak. 1997. Inoculum density, temperature and geno-type effects on epiphytic and endophytic colonization andin vitro growth promotion of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L) by a pseudomonad bacterium. Can J Microbio 143:354–361.
Quarrie, S.A. 1982. DroopF. a wilty mutant of pota~ deficient in abscisic acid. Plant Cell Environ 5:23–26
Sharma, V.K. and J. Nowak. 1998. Introduction of Verticillium wilt resistance in tomato transplants byin vitro co-culture of seedlings with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN). Can J Microbiol (in press).
Simmonds, N.W. 1965. Mutant expression in diploid potatoes. Heredity 20:65–72.
Sipos, J., J. Nowak, and G. Hicks. 1988. Effect of daminozide on survival, growth and yield of micropropagated potatoes. Am Potato J 65:353–364.
Trebejo, I. and D.J. Midmore. 1990. Effect of water stress on potato growth, yield and water use in a hot tropical climate. J Agric Sci 114:321–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02853574.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bensalim, S., Nowak, J. & Asiedu, S.K. A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato. Am. J. Pot Res 75, 145–152 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895849
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895849