Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of a New Failure Criterion for Rock Mass and Concrete

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation is based on a new quadratic equation that links the principal stresses σ1 and σ3 at the moment of failure, which allows to obtain the strength in rocks and brittle materials such as concrete. Through this new empirical two-dimensional failure criterion, the normal stress acting on the fracture plane is determined in the first calculation phase by solving the first order linear differential equation, and subsequently the shear streng‘th envelope. To facilitate the calculations, the expression that relates the major and minor principal stresses σ1 and σ3 at failure are defined for a parabolic equation and presented in normalized form. Thus, the algebraic curve is expressed as a function of (σ3c) and the parameter ξ. Where, σcrepresents the uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock (rock matrix) or concrete at 28 days, \(f_{c}^{{^{\prime}}}\), and on the other hand, ξ = t/σc) is a dimensionless parameter whose quotient is obtained by dividing the tensile strength σt by σc. Through the procedure described on this research (Focus Procedure) the parameters k1 and k2 that relate the principal stresses are determined with a good approximation grade through the relation ξ = (σtc), both in the intact rock condition as a function of rock mass quality index. All of this, with the additional advantage, that it is not required to know the interval of the principal failure stress (σ3, σ1) through the experimental tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a parabola, the length of the latus rectum is equal to the absolute value of 4p. The value of p (focal distance) is the distance between the vertex to the focus and from the vertex to the directrix.

References

  • Aubertin M, Simon L (2002) A multiaxial stress criterion for short-and long-term strength of isotropic rock media. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:1169–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer G (1952) A general analysis solution for Mohr’s envelope. Proc ASTM 52:1260–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2002) Some New Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2016) Non-linear shear strength for rock, rock joints, rockfill and interfaces. Innov Infrastruct Sol 1(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z (1974) Estimating the strength of rock materials. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 74(8):312–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski T (1989) Engineering rock mechanics classifications. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodonyi J (1970) Laboratory tests of certain rocks under axially symmetrical loading conditions. In: 2nd ISRM international congress of rock mechanics, Belgrade, Paper, pp. 2–17

  • Edelbro C (2003) Rock mass strength—a review. Technical Report 2003:16, Lulea University of Technology, Department of Civil and Mining Engineering—Division of Rock Mechanics , p 92

  • Fairhurst C (1964) On the validity of the “Brazilian” test for brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1(4):535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JA, Hoek E (1970) Developments in triaxial testing technique. Rock Mech 2(2):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs DW (1964) The tensile strength of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1(3):385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News J 2(2):4e16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Divis 106(GT9):1013–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown T (1989) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion-a 1988 updated in Rock engineering for undergrounds excavations. In: Curran JC (ed) Proc. 15th Canadian Rock Mech. Toronto: Dept. Civil Engineering, University of Toronto. Symp, pp. 31–38

  • Hoek E, Wood D, Shah S (1992) A modified Hoek–Brown failure criterion for jointed rock masses. In: Rock characterization: ISRM symposium, Eurock'92, Chester, UK, 14–17 September 1992. Thomas Telford Publishing, pp 209–214

  • Hoek E, Brown T (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavations in hard rock. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002a) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proceedings of NARMS-Tac 1(1):267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B. (2002) Hoek-Brown criterion-2002 edition. In: Hammah R, Bawden W, Curran J, Telesnicki M (eds) Mining and tunneling innovation and opportunity, Proceedings of the 5th North American rock mechanics symposium and 17th tunnelling association of Canada conference

  • Hoek E, Marinos PG, Marinos VP (2005) Characterisation and engineering properties of tectonically undisturbed but lithologically varied sedimentary rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 42(2):277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (2019) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI–2018 edition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11:445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal A, Shrivastva BK (2012) A generalized three-dimensional failure criterion for rock masses. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(4):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamaras G, Bieniawski Z (1995) A rock strength concept for coal seams incorporating the effect of time. Proc Eighth Int Congr Rock Mech 1:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V (2017) A revised geotechnical classification GSI system for tectonically disturbed rock masses, such as flysch. Bullet Eng Geol Environ 19:1e14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1151-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Carter TG (2018) Maintaining geological reality in application of GSI for design of engineering structures in rock. J Eng Geol 239:282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index: applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Env 64(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra V (1992) Estimation of engineering parameters of rock mass. PhD thesis, University of Roorkee, India, p 267

  • Murrell S (1965) The effect of triaxial stress system on the strength of rocks at atmospheric temperatures. Geophys J Royal Astron Soc 10:231–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmström A (1995) RMi—a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. PhD, thesis, University of Oslo. (www.rockmass.net).

  • Ramamurthy T (1986) Stability of rock mass. Indian Geotech J 16(1):74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (1993) Strength, modulus responses of anisotropic rocks. In: Hudson JA (ed) Compressive rock engineering, vol 1. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 313–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheorey P (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. A.A. Balkema, Netherlands, p 176

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheorey PR, Biswas A, Choubey VD (1989) An empirical failure criterion for rocks and jointed rock masses. Eng Geol 26(2):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Goel R (2006) Elsevier Geo-engineering book series: Tunnelling in weak rocks, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 489

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres R (1992) Nuevos criterios sobre la resistencia del hormigón. Master Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of The Andes, plus annexes, p 160

  • Ucar R (1986) Determination of shear failure envelope in rock masses. J Geotech Eng 112(3):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucar R (2011) Una metodología reciente para determinar la resistencia al corte en macizos rocosos. Proc PanAm CGS Geotech Conf, Toronto, Canada 3:2694–2700

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucar R (2019) La resistencia al corte en macizos rocosos y en el hormigón. Una metodología reciente de cálculo. Madrid, p 419. AMAZON.

  • Yudhbir Y, Lemanza W, Prinzl F (1983) An empirical failure criterion for rock masses. In 5th ISRM Congress. International society for rock mechanics and rock engineering

  • Zhang L (2010) Estimating the strength of jointed rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(4):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Ucar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author confirms that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ucar, R. Determination of a New Failure Criterion for Rock Mass and Concrete. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 3795–3813 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01728-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01728-9

Keywords

Navigation