Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainability practices for SDGs: a study of Brazilian ports

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main challenges facing ports is reducing social and environmental impacts and integrating sustainability into their core business practices. Ports must make explicit moves toward publishing their policies and contributions to the low carbon economy in their reports. In 2015, the United Nations adopted a global action plan for sustainable development known as Agenda 2030. It contains 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and calls for global cooperation between governments, businesses, and civilian organizations to achieve these shared sustainable goals. This article seeks to identify sustainability practices for SDGs using content analysis on reports published by Brazilian Public Port Authorities between 2017 and 2020. Our study sampled ten port authorities that manage seventeen ports, which handled 76% of all national cargo shipments in 2021. This study is exploratory and descriptive research that involves qualitative analysis aided by Iramuteq analysis software. We concluded that the port authority reports mostly cited SDG 8 (Providing Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 11 (Creating Sustainable Cities and Communities), and SDG 14 (Protecting Aquatic/Marine Life) for the analyzed period. In practice, SDGs became a part of the port authority discussion agenda as of 2018. Only four of the ten port authorities, we evaluated reported on the SDG topic in 2020. As per the reports, SDG actions at most Brazilian ports are still incipient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We highlight that all reports and spreadsheets generated in the study are available at the link https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21445635.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thankfully acknowledge the financial support for this research from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darliane Ribeiro Cunha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix A: Acronyms General Terms

ANTAQ

Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários

AR

Annual Reports

CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility

EMS

Environmental Management Systems

ER

Environmental Reports

GHC

Greenhouse Gas

GMEP

Green Marine Environmental Program

GRI

Global Reporting Initiative

IR

Integrated Reports

MR

Management Reports

PCS

Port Community System

SDGs

Sustainable Development Goals

SR

Sustainability Reports

UN

United Nations

Appendix B: Acronyms Port Authorities

APPA

Administração dos Portos de Paranaguá e Antonina

CDC

Companhia Docas do Ceará

CDP

Companhia Docas do Pará

CDRJ

Companhia Docas do Rio de Janeiro

CDSA

Companhia Docas de Santana

CDSS

Companhia Docas São Sebastião

CODEBA

Companhia das Docas Estado da Bahia

CODERN

Companhia Docas do Rio Grande do Norte

CODESA

Companhia Docas do Espirito Santo

COMAP

Companhia Municipal de Administração Portuária

DOCAS-PB

Companhia Docas da Paraíba

EMAP

Empresa Maranhense de Administração Portuária

PORTO DO RECIFE

Autoridade Portuária do Porto do Recife

PORTOS RS

Portos do Rio Grande do Sul

SCPAR

SC Participações e Parcerias

SNPH

Superintendência Estadual de Navegação, Portos e Hidrovias

SOPH-RO

Sociedade Portos e Hidrovias do Estado de Rondônia

SPA

Santos Port Authority

SPI

Superintendência do Porto de Itajaí

SUAPE

Complexo Industrial Portuário de Suape

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunha, D.R., Pereira, N.N., de Santana Porte, M. et al. Sustainability practices for SDGs: a study of Brazilian ports. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 9923–9944 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03126-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03126-y

Keywords

Navigation