Skip to main content
Log in

Urban sprawl and local fiscal burden: analysing the Spanish case

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban sprawl is rapidly occurring in many Spanish urban areas. The objective of this paper is to evaluate how the trend of building dispersion of new residential areas may be affecting the fiscal stability of local governments in Spain. The wide diversity of the characteristics of Spanish urban areas as well as the existence of very similar local fiscal structures make this case particularly interesting. After delimiting the urban areas and the spatial unit of analysis, a precise index of urban sprawl, calculated with geo-referenced digital cartography, is used. Using the spatially disaggregated information of taxes from the Spanish National Institute for Fiscal Studies allows for a measure of fiscal burden by local areas and the ability to distinguish among types of taxes. Control variables are also available at the local level from the Spanish Census and other databases. Two methods, quantile regressions and ordinary least squares, are used in order to measure not only the average change but the heterogeneity across the distribution of the local fiscal burden associated with the changes in urban sprawl, whilst controlling for other explanatory variables in the model. The results indicate that higher levels of urban sprawl imply higher local fiscal burden. By tax categories, the phenomenon of urban sprawl particularly affects both local indirect and direct taxation. These results suggest that local decision-makers should consider urban planning as one of the fundamental tools to assure long-term local fiscal sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the Regional Authority Index on the basis of data for 2005, Spain is in the sixth position after Germany, Belgium, the United States, Canada, and Italy (Hooghe et al. 2010). This index is measured across eight dimensions: institutional depth, policy scope, fiscal autonomy, representation, law making, executive control, fiscal control, and constitutional reform.

  2. For example, the Tax on buildings, facilities and works -according to data from the Ministry of Finance and Public Administration—provided 2637.8 million euros to municipalities in 2006 but only 482.2 million euros in 2014.

  3. Catalan et al. (2008) and Muñoz (2003) develop an urban sprawl analysis for the Mediterranean coast. García-Lopez (2012) analyzes the specific case of Barcelona and, Moliní and Salgado (2012) and also Rubiera et al. (2017), the case of Madrid.

  4. As an example, see the case of Asturias studied in González et al. (2013).

  5. Excluding the autonomous cities of Ceuta and Melilla that present a particular fiscal system.

  6. See Fig. 1 for the map of the Spanish municipal structure and the real urban extensions over the municipal borders.

  7. This author criticizes the mere use of “number of inhabitants” (population) in the definition of fiscal burden. She suggests the inclusion of socio-economic variables in order to be more accurate with the analysis of local fiscal burden.

  8. It would have been desirable to subtract, from chapter III, the share of revenues corresponding to the urban activity, but there is no available data, since we only have the information aggregated by chapters. Nonetheless, at the aggregate level, we have calculated that the revenues associated with urbanistic activities in chapter III for 2011 represented 2.19% from the total of non-financial revenues (MFPA 2013).

  9. We include the branches of service activities such as accounting and legal services, architecture, audio-visual, engineering, software, advertising, research and development (R&D), or health and education services.

  10. The variable CAPITAL is significant at 1.3% level. Despite it must be considered significant at the level of 5% (**), according to the branches established, it is closer to the significance at 1% level (***).

References

  • Arribas-Bel D, Nijkemp P, Scholten H (2011) Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: a self-organizing map approach. Comput Environ Urban 35(4):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito Pérez B, Bastida Albaladejo F, Muñoz MJ (2010) Factores explicativos de la presión fiscal municipal. Revista de Contabilidad 13(2):239–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch N, Solé-Ollé A (2007) Yardstick competition and the political costs of raising taxes: an empirical analysis of Spanish municipalities. Int Tax Public Financ 14(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch N, Espasa M, Montolio D (2014) Should large Spanish municipalities be financially compensated? costs and benefits of being a capital/central municipality. Hacienda Pública Española 211(4):67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2000) Urban growth models with durable housing: an overview. In: Huriot JM, Thisse JF (eds) Economics of cities: theoretical perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 263–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell R, Listokin D (1978) The fiscal impact handbook: projecting the local cost and revenues related to growth. Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell RW, Listokin D, Galley CC (2000) Smart growth: more than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Hous Policy Debate 11(4):821–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnel T, Drummond LBW, Ho KC (2002) Critical reflections on cities in Southern Asia. Brill Academic Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell G (1998) Analyzing the fiscal impact of development: lessons for building successful communities. Community Dev J 29:38–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchfield M, Overman HG, Puga D, Turner MA (2005) Causes of sprawl: a portrait from space. Q J Econ 121(2):587–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho JA, Rodríguez M (2005) Servicios intensivos en conocimiento e innovación regional. Un análisis para las regiones europeas. Investigaciones Regionales 7:91–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramés Viéitez L (2005) Consideraciones en torno al tamaño de los municipios. Papeles y Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias Morales y Políticas 13:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárcaba García A (2003) Análisis financiero de las entidades locales mediante el uso de indicadores. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 118:661–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco D, Navarro A, Buendía D (2006) Análisis de la presión fiscal municipal y sus factores influyentes. Universidad de Málaga, Málaga

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers JI (2002) The impacts of state growth management programmers: a comparative analysis. Urban Stud 39(11):1956–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2003) Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environ Plan B 30:503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2008) Does smart growth matter to public finance? Evidence from the United States. Urban Stud 45(9):1791–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan B, Saurí D, Serra P (2008) Urban sprawl in the Mediterranean? patterns of growth and change in Barcelona metropolitan region 1993–2000. Landsc Urban Plan 85(3–4):174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen P, Loftsgarden T (2011) Drivers behind urban sprawl in Europe. TOI Report 1136/2011. Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Centre for Transport Research

  • Couch C, Ldontidou L, Petschel-Held G (2007) Urban sprawl in Europe. landscapes, land-use change & policy. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S (2003) European briefing: polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda. Eur Plan Stud 11(8):979–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado FJ (2006) Are the tax mix and the fiscal pressure converging in the European union?. Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Serie Economía, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado FJ (2012) Determinants of local tax mix: evidence from Spain. Lex Localis Journal Local Self-Government 10(4):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado FJ, Lago-Peñas S, Mayor M (2015) On the determinants of local tax rates: new evidence from Spain. Contemp Econ Policy 33(2):351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar M, Seymour E, Druță O (2015) Disinvesting in the city: the role of tax foreclosure in Detroit. Urban Aff Rev 51(5):587–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald B, Glasmeier A, Gray M, Lobao L (2014) Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline? Camb J Reg Econ Soc 7(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Environmental aspects of urban spread in Europe. Joint Research Centre, European Commission

  • Fuster Asencio MC (2010) Situación actual de las corporaciones locales: competencias y recursos. Crónica Tributaria 136:103–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster G, Ratcliffe MR, Wolman H, Coleman S, Freihage J (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous Policy Debate 12(4):681–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Lopez MA (2012) Urban spatial structure, suburbanization and transportation in Barcelona. J Urban Econ 72:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2004) Sprawl and urban growth. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4, chap 56, edn 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2481–2527

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Antonio M, Hortas-Rico M, Li L (2016) The causes of urban sprawl in Spanish urban areas: a spatial approach. Spat Econ Anal 11(2):219–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González VM, Rubiera F, Rivero JL (2013) Dispersión urbana en áreas metropolitanas policéntricas: análisis del caso asturiano mediante el uso de sistemas de información geográfica. ACE Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno 8(24):38–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez D, Rubiera F, Viñuela A (2017) Heterogeneity in the determinants of the population growth at the local level. Analysis of the Spanish case with GWR approach. Int Regional Sci Rev 40(3):211–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila E, Craig S (1991) Nested fiscal impact measures using the new theory of local public goods. J Reg Sci 31:65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L, Marks G, Schakel AH (2010) The rise of regional authority: a comparative study of 42 democracies (1950–2006). Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hortas-Rico M (2014) Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: a dynamic panel data approach. Pap Reg Sci 93(4):843–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortas-Rico M, Solé-Ollé A (2010) Does urban sprawl increase the cost of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Stud 47(7):1513–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2016) Household budget survey, 2014. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Schwick C (2014) Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: weighted urban proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecol Indic 38:294–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey TW (1996) The fiscal impacts of alternative land uses: what do cost community services studies really tell us? J Community Dev 27:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Warner ME (2018) Geographies of local government stress after the Great Recession. Soc Policy Adm 52(1):365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Basset JG (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen M, Schutle S (2009) A meta-analysis of cost community service studies. Int Regional Sci Rev 32:376–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd HF, Yinger J (1989) America’s ailing cities: fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Lago Peñas S (2004) Local governments’ asymmetric reactions to grants: looking for the reasons. Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Serie Economía, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine HC, Justice JB, Scorsone EA (2013) Handbook of local government fiscal health. Jones and Bartlett Learning, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao L, Kraybill DS (2005) The emerging roles of county governments in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: findings from a national survey. Econ Dev Q 19(3):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao L, Adua L, Hooks G (2014) Privatization, business attraction, and social services across the United States: local governments’ use of market-oriented, neoliberal policies in the post-2000 period. Soc Probl 61(4):644–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Laborda J, Martinez-Vazquez J, Monasterio C (2006) The practice of fiscal federalism in Spain. International Studies Program, Georgia State University, WP 06–23

  • Martinez-Vazquez J, Sans-Sanz F (2007) Fiscal reform in Spain. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez J, Timofeev A (2010) Choosing between centralized and decentralized models of tax administration. Int J Public Admin 33(12–13):601–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TJ, Sjoquist DL (2002) Urban sprawl and the finances of state and local governments. In: Sjoquist DL (ed) State and local finances under pressure. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 299–326

    Google Scholar 

  • MFPA (2013) Haciendas Locales en Cifras. Año 2011. Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas, Madrid [In English: Local Treasuries in Figures. Year 2011. Ministry of Finance and Public Administration, Madrid]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Fomento (2011) Las Áreas Urbanas. Documento del Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Moliní F, Salgado M (2012) Sprawl in Spain and Madrid: a low starting point growing fast. Eur Plan Stud 20(6):1075–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz F (2003) Lock living: urban sprawl in Mediterranean cities. Cities 20(6):381–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson P (1981) City Limits. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GE (2009) Unlocking land values to finance urban structure. Trends and policy options series public–private infrastructure advisory facility. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Polèse M, Champain C (2003) La evolución de los centros urbanos: La experiencia de América del Norte. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Portillo Navarro MJ (2016) Economic crisis and municipalities: analysis through indicators budget according to size. Revista de Estudios Regionales 107:207–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW, Chnag-Hee CB (2004) Urban sprawl in Western Europe and the United States. Ashgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero J (2012) Construcción residencial y gobierno del territorio de España. De la burbuja especulativa a la recesión, causas y consecuencias. Cuadernos Geográficos 47:17–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubiera F, González V, Rivero JL (2016) Urban sprawl in Spain: differences among cities and causes. Eur Plan Stud 24(1):204–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubiera F, Marroquin VM, Rivero JL (2017) Urban sprawl in Madrid? An analysis of the urban growth of Madrid during the last quarter of the XX century. Lett Spat Res Sci 10(2):205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati L, Gargiulo-Morelli V (2014) Unveiling urban sprawl in the Mediterranean Region: towards a latent urban transformation? Int J Urban Reg 38(6):1935–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Ollé A (2006) The effects of party competition on budges outcomes: empirical evidence from local government in Spain. Public Choice 126(1):145–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires GD (2002) Sprawl: causes and consequences and policy responses. The Urban Institute Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturn R, Cohen DA (2004) Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health 118(7):488–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez Pandiello J, Bosch Roca N, Pedraja Chaparro F, Rubio Guerrero JJ, Utrilla De La Hoz A (2008) La financiación local en España: radiografía del presente y propuestas de futuro. FEMP, Madrid

  • Suárez Pandiello J, Fernández Llera R (2012) Impactos de la crisis sobre la Hacienda local española:datos y retos básicos. In: Portillo Navarro MJ, Merino Estrada V (eds) Crisis económica y entidades locales. Lex Nova, Valladolid, pp 59–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrens P (2008) A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Appl Spat Anal Policy 1(1):5–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner ME, Pratt JE (2005) Spatial diversity in local government revenue effort under decentralization: a neural-network approach. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 23(5):657–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafra JL, López AM (2006) La valoración de la condición financiera de los ayuntamientos andaluces. Auditoría Pública 39:41–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor Peter Huber, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. The first author, as a visiting scholar in the IRPET, would like to express her very great appreciation to Patrizia Lattarulo and also Claudia Ferretti for their valuable and constructive suggestions during the second review of this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Varela-Candamio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varela-Candamio, L., Rubiera Morollón, F. & Sedrakyan, G. Urban sprawl and local fiscal burden: analysing the Spanish case. Empirica 46, 177–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9421-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9421-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation