Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Toolkit for Measuring Sprawl

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debate regarding suburban sprawl in urban studies is contentious. It is fair to say that the phenomenon is not fully understood to satisfaction in the academic, policy, or planning communities and there are a host of reasons why this may be the case. Characterization of sprawl in the literature is often narrative and subjective. Measurement is piecemeal and largely data-driven. Existing studies yield contrary results for the same cities in many cases. The partial appreciation for the intricacies of sprawl is problematic. In practice, city planning agencies and citizen advocacy groups are scrambling to suggest and develop “smart growth” strategies to curb sprawl, without a strong empirical basis for measuring the phenomenon. Yet, sprawl is extremely popular with consumers. In this paper, we develop an innovative approach to diagnosing sprawl, looking across the full range of its characteristic attributes in a comprehensive fashion that is robust to some well-known challenges. This proves to be very useful in sweeping the parameter space of the phenomenon, enabling the visualization and valuation of sprawl surfaces across attributes, allowing us to check the pulse of a developing city. We apply the work to Austin, TX, a controversial exemplar of American sprawl, with the surprising result that sprawl and “smart growth” are found to co-exist and co-evolve. This raises questions about relationships between the two, with consequences for planning and public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti, M. (1999). Modeling the urban ecosystem: A conceptual framework. Environment and Planning B, 26(4), 605–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I., Shermyen, A. H., & Smith, M. T. (1990). Ideal urban form and visions of the good life: Florida’s growth management dilemma. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(4), 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, C.-H. C., & Richardson, H. W. (1994). Automobiles, the environment and metropolitan spatial structure. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfield, F. K., Raimi, M. D., & Chen, D. D. T. (1999). Once there were Greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America’s environment, economy, and social fabric. New York and Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, R. W., Shad, N. A., Lisotkin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S., et al (1998). The costs of sprawl revisited. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchfield, M., Overman, H. G., Puga, D., & Turner, M. (2006). Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 587–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P., Fulton, W., & Fishman, R. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, W. B., Jr. (2003). Continuum-based classification of remotely sensed imagery to describe urban sprawl on the watershed scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Speck, J., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (2001). Smart growth: New urbanism in American communities. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Nasser, H., & Overberg, P. (2001). A comprehensive look at sprawl in America. USA Today, February 22.

  • Ewing, R. (1994). Causes, characteristics, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Issues, 21(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Pendall, R., & Chen, D. D. T. (2002). Measuring sprawl and its impact. Washington D.C.: Smart Growth America

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., & Frey, W. H. (1994). Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks in the 1980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. American Sociological Review, 59, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2000). Quantitative geography: Perspectives on spatial data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2004). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. (1991). Black suburbanization: Has it changed the relative location of the races?. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive conceptHousing Policy Debate, 12(4), 681–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. (1992). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G. (1989). New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21, 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1997a). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1997b). Where’s the sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1983). Decentralization without end? In the expanding city: Essays in HONOR OF PROFESSOR Jean Gottmann. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, J. (2004). A geospatial approach to measuring new development tracts for characteristics of sprawl. Landscape Journal, 23(1), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, J., & Lathrop, R. G. (2003a). A housing-unit-level approach to characterizing residential sprawl. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69(9), 1021–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, J. E., & Lathrop, R. G. (2003b). Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied Geography, 23, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUD. (1999). The State of the Cities. Washington, DC: US Departmet of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Duncan & Associates, Van Horn, G. A., Ivey, B., Harris, and Walls, Inc., & Wade-Trim, I. (1989). The search for efficient urban growth patterns: A study of the fiscal impacts of development in Florida. Presented to the Governor’s Task Force on Urban Growth Patterns and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, July 1989.

  • Katz, P. (1993). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H., Sugihara, G., & O’Neill, R. V. (1981). Landscape patterns in a disturbed environmentOikos, 48, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. E. (2003). Open spaces, bounded places: Does the American West’s arid landscape yield dense metropolitan growth? Housing Policy Debate, 13(4), 755–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, R. C. (1967). The city as a place to live. In J. Gottmann, R. A. Harpe (Eds./), Metropolis on the move: Geographers look at urban sprawl. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessinger, J. (1962). The cause for scatteration: Some reflections on the National Capitol Region plan for the year 2000. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28(3), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R., & Hynes, H. P. (2003). Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution, and trends. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpezzi, S. (1999). Estimates of the measurement and determinants of urban sprawl in U.S. mteopolitan areas. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Center for Urban Land Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E. S., & Tan, J. P. (1980). A comparison of urban population density functions in developed and developing countries. Urban Studies, 17, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena 37. Biometrika, 37, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1983). The modifiable areal unit problem, CATMOG 38. Norwich: GeoBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA. (1995). The technological reshaping of Metropolitan America. Washington, DCUS Congress Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiser, R. (1989). Density and urban sprawl. Land Economics, 65(3), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendall, R. (1999). Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environment and Planning B, 26, 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real Estate Research Corporation (1974). The costs of sprawl: Environmental and economic costs of alternative residential patterns at the Urban Fringe. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K. H., O’Neill, R. V., Wickham, J. D., & Jones, K. B. (1996). A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology, 11(4), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club. (1998). Sprawl: The dark side of the American dream. College Park, MD: Challenge to Sprawl Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., & Knaap, G.-J. (2004). Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhira, H. S., Ramachandra, T. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2003). Urban sprawl pattern recognition and modeling using GIS. Paper read at Map India Conference 2003.

  • Sui, D. Z., Wei, T., & Gavinha, J. (2004). How smart is smart growth? The case of Austin, Texas. In D. G. Janelle, B. Warf, K. Hansen (Eds.), World Minds: Geographical perspectives on 100 problems (pp. 209–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, S., & Weber, J. (2007). Journey-to-work patterns in the age of sprawl: Evidence from two midsize southern Metropolitan Areas. The Professional Geographer, 59(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, P. M. (2006). Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 248–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S., & Lee, J. (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geographical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Paul M. Torrens

Authors
  1. Paul M. Torrens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul M. Torrens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torrens, P.M. A Toolkit for Measuring Sprawl. Appl. Spatial Analysis 1, 5–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9000-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9000-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation