Skip to main content
Log in

Yardstick competition and the political costs of raising taxes: An empirical analysis of Spanish municipalities

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We test the ‘yardstick competition’ hypothesis by examining the effects of property tax increases, both in a given municipality and in other neighbouring jurisdictions, on the incumbents’ vote. In order to obtain unbiased estimates of the effects of raising taxes on voting patterns, we take into account national political shocks, the ideological preferences of the citizenship and government traits, and apply Instrumental Variables. The vote equation is estimated using a large database containing nearly 3,000 Spanish municipalities, and we analyse three local election results (1995, 1999 and 2003). Our results suggest that property tax increases, both at the municipal and neighbourhood level, have a non-negligible impact on the incumbent’s share of the vote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. J. (1995). The dynamics of public support for coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies, 28(3), 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J. (2000). Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies, 19, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluewer Academic Publishers, Arellano, M.,&Bond, S. (1991): Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T.,&Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behaviour: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T.,&Smart, M. (2001). Electoral accountability and competition among governments. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics.

  • Bordignon, M., Revelli, F.,&Cerniglia, F. (2003). In search of yardstick competition: A spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordignon, M., Revelli, F.,&Cerniglia, F. (2004). Yardstick competition in intergovernmental relationships: theory and empirical predictions. Economics Letters, forthcoming.

  • Bloom, H.,&Ladd, H. F. (1982). Property tax revaluation and tax levy growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 11, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, C.,&Pinkse, J. (2000). The determinants of municipal tax rates in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, 695–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. W.,&Prysby, Ch. L. (1992). Political behavior and the local context. New York: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. and Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54, 203–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T. (2001). Local business taxation and competition for capital. The choice of the tax rate. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, J. M. (1995). Espana y Portugal. In J. M. Colomer (ed.), La política en Europa: Introducción a las instituciones de quince Países. Ariel, Barcelona. Diputación de Barcelona (various years): SIEM, Servei d’InformacióEconòmica Municipal.

  • Feld, L., Josselin, J.,&Rocaboy, Y. (2001). Yardstick competition: A theoretical Model and an Empirical analysis for French regions. Paper presented at the 56th IIPF Conference, Seville, Spain.

  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1988). Rate increases and local elections: A different approach and a different conclusion. Policy and Politics, 16, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.,&Steward, J. (1992). Poll tax, rates and local elections. Political Studies, 40, 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. B. (1983). The Politics of Taxation: Revenue without representation, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978): Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(3), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyndels, B. and Vuchelen, J. (1998). Tax mimicking among Belgian municipalities. National Tax Journal, 51(1), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H. F. (1991). Property tax revaluation and tax levy growth revisited. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon, S.,&Ryan, D. L. (1997). The political costs of taxes and government spending. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(1), 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. C., Alt, J. E.,&Ferree, K. E. (1998). Fiscal policy outcomes and electoral accountability in American States. American Political Science Review, 92, 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magre, J. (1998). L’Alcalde a Catalunya., Collecció Punt a la i, Fundació Jaume Bofill, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molas, I.,&Bartomeus, O. (1998). Estructura de la competencia política a Catalunya. Working Paper 138, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. (1948). The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 10, 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G.,&Yoshinaka, A. (2002). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking into account of the political context across time and nations. Electoral Studies, 21, 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G., Stanley, H. W.,&Vogel, R. J. (1995). State economies and State taxes: do voters hold governors accountable?. American Journal of Political Science 39, 936–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1997): “Political business cycles”. In D. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on public choice: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1992). Voters as fiscal conservatives. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, G. (1968 and 1976): Elections in America: Control and influence in American politics. Dodd, Mead., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallings, C.,&Thrasher, M. (1997). Local elections in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelli, F. (2001). Spatial patterns in local taxation: Tax mimicking or error mimicking?. Applied Economics, 33, 1101–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelli, F. (2002). Local taxes, national politics and spatial interactions in English district election results. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royed, T. J., Leyden, K. M.,&Borrelli, S. A. (2000): Is ‘clarity of responsibility’ important for economic voting? Revisiting the Powell and Whitten’s Hypothesis. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 669–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargan, J. (1958). The estimation of economic relationship using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. (1985). A theory of yardstick competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Ollé, A. (2003): Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: the effects of electoral margins, coalition government, and ideology. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Ollé, A. (2005). The effects of party competition on budget outcomes: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Public Choice, (forthcoming).

  • Sotillos, I. (1997). El comportamiento electoral municipal espanol, 1979–85. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D. and Stock, J. H. (1997): Instrumental variables estimation with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strumpf, K. (2002). Infrequent assessments distort property taxes: theory and evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 169–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stults, B.,&Winters, R. F. (2002). The political economy of taxes and the vote. Paper presented at the 2002 Midwest Political Science Association meetings.

  • Turett, S. (1971). The vulnerability of American governors: 1900–1969. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 15, 108–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, J.,&Veiga, L. G. (2004). Popularity functions, partisan effects, and support in Parliament. Economics and Politics, 16(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeier, J.,&Heyndels, B. (2004). The electoral cost of tax policy in Flemish municipalities. Paper presented at the 2004 Public Choice Conference in Berlin.

  • Wilkin, S., Haller, B.,&Norpoth, H. (1997). From Argentina to Zambia: A world-wide test of economic voting. Electoral Studies, 16, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, R. W. (1993). Property taxation, property base, and property value. An empirical test of the New View. National Tax Journal, 46(2), 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrede, M. (2001). Yardstick competition to tame the Leviathan. European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 705–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Solé-Ollé.

Additional information

JEL Classification H71 · H73

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosch, N., Solé-Ollé, A. Yardstick competition and the political costs of raising taxes: An empirical analysis of Spanish municipalities. Int Tax Public Finan 14, 71–92 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6348-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6348-1

Keywords

Navigation