Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to tackle plastic bags and bottles pollution crisis in Pakistan? A cost–benefit analysis approach

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plastic pollution is among the many socio-economic and environmental dilemmas that have engulfed Pakistan. The exponentially increasing consumption of plastic and the difficulty of dealing with its waste has compelled the government to impose a ban on the use of non-biodegradable plastics. This ban has made Pakistan the 128th country to curb plastic usage through punitive measures. However, the country lacks cheap and sustainable alternatives for plastic bags and bottles, which form the most significant chunk of plastic waste. This research study aims to analyze and propose alternatives that can replace these plastic bags and bottles without compromising the lifestyle of citizens. The aim of this study is two-fold; first, it employs Fuzzy VIKOR, a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making technique for comparison and prioritization of alternatives, i.e., Conventional Plastic bags, Paper bags, and Bioplastic bags, with respect to multiple aspects of sustainability. Secondly, it performs a cost–benefit analysis of a Bioplastic plant, with a focus on the production of biodegradable plastic bottles. The MCDM analysis prioritized the bioplastic bags, followed by paper bags and the least preferable alternative turned out to be conventional plastic bags. The cost–benefit analysis indicated that although the production of bioplastic bottles instead of conventional plastic bottles would lead to the reduction of detrimental environmental impacts, however, currently it is not financially profitable for the industrialists to switch to bioplastics. Therefore, it is recommended that government authorities should incorporate carbon taxes and subsidize the sustainable development sector, which would, in turn, lead to the reduction of plastic consumption and waste in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MCDM:

Multi-criteria decision making

VIKOR:

Multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

TOPSIS:

Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution

PET:

Polyethylene terephthalate

PLA:

Polylactic acid

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

GWP:

Global warming potential

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousaf Ali.

Additional information

Handling editor Luiz Duczmal.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.

Table 9 Data, responses on importance of criteria
Table 10 Data, responses on suitability of paper bags
Table 11 Data, responses on suitability of conventional plastic bags
Table 12 data, responses on suitability of bioplastic bags
Table 13 Fuzzy decision matrix and fuzzy best and worst values
Table 14 Calculations leading towards S, R and Q values
Table 15 S values
Table 16 R values
Table 17 Q values

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, Y., Sara, S. & Rehman, O.u. How to tackle plastic bags and bottles pollution crisis in Pakistan? A cost–benefit analysis approach. Environ Ecol Stat 28, 697–727 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00511-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00511-6

Keywords

Navigation