Article PDF
References
Bradford DF (2001) Time, money and tradeoffs. Nature 410:649–650
Fisher DA, Hales CH, Wang WC, Ko MKW, Sze ND (1990) Model calculations of the relative effects of CFCs and their replacements on global warming. Nature 344:513–516
Fuglestvedt JS, Berntsen TK, Godal O, Sausen R, Shine KP, Skodvin T (2003) Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Clim Change 58:267–331
Fuglestvedt JS, Shine KP, Cook J, Berntsen T, Lee DS, Stenke A, Skeie RB, Velders GJM, Waitz IA (2009) Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: metrics. Atmos Environ. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.044
Godal O (2003) The IPCC’s assessment of multidisciplinary issues: the case of greenhouse gas indices. An editorial essay. Clim Change 58:243–249
IPCC (1990) Climate change: the intergovernmental panel on climate change scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2009) Summary report of the IPCC expert meeting on the science of alternative metrics 18–20 March 2009, Oslo, Norway. IPCC-XXX/Doc.13 (31.III.2009) Available at www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session30/doc13.pdf
Johansson DJA, Persson UM, Azar C (2006) The cost of using global warming potentials: analyzing the trade off between CO2, CH4 and N2O. Clim Change 77:291–309
Johansson DJA, Persson UM, Azar C (2008) Uncertainty and learning: implications for the trade-off between short-lived and long-lived greenhouse gases. Clim Change 88:293–308
Lashof DA, Ahuja DR (1990) Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344:529–531
Manne AS, Richels RG (2001) An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature 410:675–677
O’Neill BC (2000) The jury is still out on global warming potentials. Clim Change 44:427–443
O’Neill BC (2003) Economics, natural science, and the costs of global warming potentials—an editorial comment. Clim Change 58:251–260
Rogers JD, Stephens RD (1988) Absolute infrared intensities for F-113 and F-114 and an assessment of their greenhouse warming potential relative to other chlorofluorocarbons. J Geophys Res 93:2423–2428
Rotmans J, Den Elzen MGJ (1992) A model-based approach to the calculation of global warming potentials (GWPs). Int J Climatol 12:865–874
Shackley S, Wynne B (1997) Global warming potentials: ambiguity or precision as an aid to policy. Clim Res 8:89–106
Sherwood S (2007) Discounting and uncertainty: a non-economist’s view. Clim Change 80:205–212
Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N (2005) Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Change 68:281–302
Shine KP, Berntsen TK, Fuglestvedt JS, Bieltvedt Skeie R, Stuber N (2007) Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents. Philos Trans R Soc, A 365:1903–1914
Skodvin T (1999) Making climate change negotiable: the development of the global warming potential index. Working Paper 1999:09. CICERO, Oslo, Norway. Available at http://www.cicero.uio.no/media/194.pdf
Skodvin T, Fuglestvedt JS (1997) A comprehensive approach to climate change: political and scientific considerations. Ambio 26:351–358
Smith SJ (2003) The evaluation of greenhouse gas indices—an editorial comment. Clim Change 58:261–265
Tanaka K, O’Neill BC, Rokityanskiy D, Obersteiner M, Tol RSJ (2009) Evaluating global warming potentials with historical temperature. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9566-6
van Vuuren DP, Weyant J, de la Chesnaye F (2006) Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing. Energy Econ 28:102–120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shine, K.P. The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Climatic Change 96, 467–472 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6