Introduction

Evaluation of the changes in the contractile state of the left ventricle during exercise is an important, and as yet not easy, goal in the procedure for cardiac rehabilitation. The positive inotropic effect of increasing the frequency of contraction in isolated cardiac muscles has been known as the Bowditch effect or the staircase phenomenon. The positive inotropic effect of increased heart rate (HR) produced by pacing also has been demonstrated in healthy human subjects, which has been called the force−frequency relation (FFR) [1, 2]. In conventional methods of obtaining FFRs, the maximum rate of left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (peak dP/dt) measured with a catheter-tipped micromanometer was used as an index of cardiac contractility, and atrial pacing was used to change HR (peak dP/dt−HR relation). It has also been reported that the FFR is significantly affected in hearts with a variety of diseases [37].

During exercise, HR increases with an increase in workload; therefore, atrial pacing is not needed for changing HR. It has also been demonstrated that the peak dP/dt−HR relation is markedly enhanced (the slope is increased) during exercise compared with during pacing in normal hearts, but the enhancement is limited in diseased hearts [8]. The FFR obtained by exercise may have higher power to discriminate cardiac contractile states than that obtained by pacing. In spite of its potential for evaluating cardiac function during exercise, peak dP/dt−HR relation has not been widely used because of its invasive nature. We have reported that carotid arterial wave intensity (WI) noninvasively measured with a combined system of color Doppler and echo tracking is a sensitive index of global LV contractile function (Fig. 1) [9, 10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relation between W1 obtained by carotid arterial echography and max dP/dt obtained with a catheter-tipped micromanometer (From Ohte N et al. [9])

In this study, we assessed the usefulness of WI to measure LV contractility and FFRs during exercise in healthy subjects, and evaluated the feasibility of an entirely noninvasive method for demonstration of the global LV FFR.

Materials and methods

Definition of wave intensity in terms of diameter-change

Wave intensity (WI) is a hemodynamic index, which is defined as

$$ {\text{WI = }}\left( {{\text{d}}P / {\text{d}}t} \right) \, \left( {{\text{d}}U / {\text{d}}t} \right) $$
(1)

where dP/dt and dU/dt are the derivatives of blood pressure (P) and velocity (U) with respect to time, respectively. The maximum value of WI during a cardiac cycle (W1) significantly correlates with peak dP/dt (or max dP/dt) (Fig. 1) [9].

In our method of obtaining carotid arterial WI, the carotid diameter-change waveform was used as a surrogate for carotid pressure waveform. Using the diameter-change waveform directly, we can also define another wave intensity (WD) as

$$ {\text{WD = }}\left( { 1 /D} \right) \, \left( {{\text{d}}D / {\text{d}}t} \right) \, \left( {{\text{d}}U / {\text{d}}t} \right) $$
(2)

where D is the diameter. We can obtain the relation of WD to WI as follows:

The definition of the stiffness parameter, β, is written as

$$ \beta = \left( {\ln P - {\text{ln}}P_{{\text{d}}} } \right)/\left[ {\left( {D - D_{{\text{d}}} } \right)/D_{{\text{d}}} } \right], $$

where D is the diameter at pressure P, and D d is the diameter at the end-diastolic pressure P d. The above equation gives:

$$ \beta \left( {D{-}D_{\text{d}} } \right) /D_{\text{d}} {\text{ = ln }}P{{ {-} ln }}P_{\text{d}} . $$

The differentials of both sides of the above equation give

$$ \beta {\text{d}}D /D_{\text{d}} {\text{ = d}}P /P . $$

Since the difference between D and D d is small (Fig. 2), D d can be replaced by D. Then, we obtain

$$ {\text{d}}D /D{\text{ = d}}P /\beta P , $$

which gives

$$ \left( { 1 /D} \right)\left( {{\text{d}}D / {\text{d}}t} \right){ = (1/}\beta P )\left( {{\text{d}}P / {\text{d}}t} \right) , $$
(3)

where dD/dt and dP/dt are the time derivatives of D and P, respectively. Substituting Eq. 3 into Eq. 2 and using Eq. 1, we obtain

$$ {\text{WD = (1/}}\beta P ) {\text{WI}} $$
(4)

Figure 2 shows the WD waveform calculated from the diameter-change waveform and the velocity waveform.

According to Eq. 4, the maximum value of carotid arterial WD during a cardiac cycle (WD1) correlates with the maximum value of WI (W1). Therefore, WD1 correlates with peak dP/dt as W1 does (Fig. 1). WD is obtained by measuring U and D without measuring upper arm pressure (Fig. 3), which is easier to perform during exercise. The details of the method of measurements were described elsewhere [11].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative recordings of carotid arterial diameter (D) and blood flow velocity (U), and calculated wave intensity (WD) in a healthy human. WD is the wave intensity defined by using D as WD = (1/D) (dD/dt) (dU/dt)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Measurements of diameter-change waveform and blood velocity. Left Long axis view of the common carotid artery and ultrasound beams. By setting the tracking positions displayed as small pink bars on the echo tracking beam (line A) to arterial walls, echo tracking automatically starts. The blood flow velocity averaged along the Doppler beam (line B) crossing the artery was measured using range-gated color Doppler signals. Right The diameter-change waveform, which is calculated by subtracting the distance to the near wall from that to the far wall, is displayed on the M-mode view. The blood flow velocity waveform is also displayed on the M-mode view

Thus, we can regard the WD1-HR relation as the FFR.

Subjects

We studied 25 healthy male volunteers (mean age 20.8 ± 1.2 years, age range 19−23 years) (Table 1). We obtained informed consent from all the subjects. Approval from the Ethics Committee of Himeji Dokkyo University was obtained before study initiation.

Table 1 Baseline data of all the subjects

Protocol

Subjects were asked to refrain from caffeine, alcohol, and exercise during the 24-h period before the test. Before the measurements of WD1 and HR, the subjects were laid down the supine position for 10 min. The location to be measured was the right common carotid artery at about 2 cm proximal to the carotid bulb. We used scanning in the long axis view, and obtained a B-mode image of a longitudinal section of the artery (Fig. 3, left). With the B- and M-mode scans displayed simultaneously on a split screen, the echo tracking system tracked the vessel wall movements to produce displacement waveforms of the anterior and posterior artery walls (Fig. 3, right). This gave the diameter-change waveforms.

After the measurements of WD1 and HR at rest, gradual bicycle exercise was performed starting at an initial workload of 20 W and lasting for 2 min; thereafter, the workload was increased stepwise by 20 W at 1 min intervals. Electrocardiogram was continuously monitored. The criteria for the endpoint included increase of heart rate to [(220-age) × 0.8 (bpm)], and achievement of maximum fatigue or the impossibility of continuing exercise. We measured WD1 and HR during the exercise.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The scatter diagram of the points (WD1, HR) for the data during exercise from each subject was analyzed by the linear regression method, and the regression line was regarded as the FFR. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The baseline data from the subjects are shown in Table 1. We first confirmed that HR increased linearly with an increase in work load in all the subjects (r 2 = 0.95 ± 0.04) (Fig. 4). WD1 increased linearly with an increase in HR (Fig. 5). The goodness-of-fit of the regression line of WD1 on HR in each subject was very high (r 2 = 0.8 ± 0.1, p < 0.0001, respectively). The slope of the WD1-HR relation ranged from 0.30 to 2.20 [m/s3 (beat/min)] (mean ± SD: 1.0 ± 0.4 [m/s3 (beat/min)]). Figure 5 contains the WD1-HR relation with the greatest slope, that with the smallest slope, and those with moderate slopes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A representative relation between heart rate (HR) (bpm) and work load (W) in healthy male subjects. The solid line indicates the linear regression line, and the dotted curves show the 95 % confidence band of the regression line

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relations between the maximum values of WD (WD1) and heart rate (HR) (bpm). As representative data, WD1-HR relation with the greatest slope, that with the smallest slope, and those with moderate slopes are shown. The solid lines indicate the regression lines. The dotted curves show the 95 % confidence bands of the regression lines

Discussion

It has been reported that the basic property of the force−frequency effect to progressively enhance myocardial contractility as the heart rate increases is markedly augmented due to β-adrenergic stimulations induced by exercise in normal hearts [12, 13]. This possibility was examined in conscious dogs through the study of force−frequency effects during graded infusions of the β-adrenergic receptor agonist dobutamine under resting conditions. During infusions of low, medium, and high doses of dobutamine, the heart rate varied from 100 to 210 bpm by atrial pacing. During the dobutamine infusions, LV peak dP/dt progressively increased as the heart rate was augmented; the increase was greater at high doses than at low doses of dobutamine [14]. Thus, the regulatory effect of enhanced β-adrenergic stimulation on the FFR is as important as the basal FFR during exercise [15]. Significant impairment of β-adrenergic amplification of the FFR has been observed in heart failure, which could contribute to impaired cardiac contractility during exercise [16, 17]. Accordingly, one would expect that the diversity of responses of the FFR to β-adrenergic stimulations induced by exercise affords increased sensitivity for detection of contractile impairment.

One group has used exercise echocardiography to demonstrate FFRs noninvasively [18]. However, in contrast to the present study, their index (systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume) was a rarely used and unvalidated index of contractility.

Several other groups have used tissue Doppler-derived isovolumic acceleration (IVA) during exercise, and presented FFR curves [1921]. However, IVA is a parameter of regional myocardial contractility of the LV wall, and does not necessarily represent the global contractile state of the left ventricle. Indeed, IVA values vary considerably according to the region of interest of the LV wall. In some cases, IVA obtained from the mid lateral wall is more than 50 % greater than that obtained from the basal anterior wall [22]. In addition, the IVA-HR relation during exercise is not linear [21], in contrast to the linear WD1-HR relation. It is always easier to characterize a linear relation than to characterize a nonlinear relation.

Equation 4 shows that WD contains β. It is widely known that β increases with age. However, our study subjects only ranged from 19 to 23 years old. Therefore, β was considered to vary only slightly with the individual. In spite of this, the slope of the FFR varied relatively widely. This is considered to show that the FFR during exercise is determined mainly by the cardiac contractile state rather than arterial conditions.

Limitations

Although the WD1-HR relation depends on age, our study subjects only ranged from 19 to 23 years old. We should enroll a greater number of subjects to be divided into age groups in a future study. The final goal of our study is to apply the force−frequency relation to cardiac rehabilitation. However, we did not enroll patients with heart diseases in the present feasibility study.

Conclusions

Measurements of carotid arterial wave intensity by echocardiography during exercise give the FFR noninvasively. This will be useful for evaluation of the contractile state of the left ventricle during exercise for cardiac rehabilitation.