Abstract
The epithelial cadherin (CDH1) is an important determinant of tumor progression. Previous studies have indicated that the CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism was associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, they yielded conflicting results. Thus, we conducted this case–control study to evaluate the association between the CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism and susceptibility to CRC in a Chinese population. We recruited 351 cases and 411 controls in this case–control study. The genotype of the CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOFMS). This study found that the CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism was associated with decreased risk of CRC in this Chinese Han population. Subgroup analyses showed that the CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism decreased the risk of CRC among the males and non-drinkers. In addition, a significantly decreased risk was observed in CRC patients with tumor size ≤ 5 cm, and AA genotype showed a protective role in the CRC patients with no lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, this study shows that CDH1 –160C/A polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of CRC in a Chinese Han population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anvarnia A, Mohaddes-Gharamaleki F, Asadi M, Akbari M, Yousefi B, Shanehbandi D. Dysregulated microRNAs in colorectal carcinogenesis: new insight to cell survival and apoptosis regulation. J Cell Physiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28872.
Yarla NS, Gali H, Pathuri G, et al. Targeting the paracrine hormone-dependent guanylate cyclase/cGMP/phosphodiesterases signaling pathway for colorectal cancer prevention. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;56:168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.08.011.
Robertson DJ, Ladabaum U. Opportunities and challenges in moving from current guidelines to personalized colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:904–17. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.012.
Peng L, Weigl K, Boakye D, Brenner H. Risk scores for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in the average-risk population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1788–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0209-2.
Wong MCS, Chan CH, Lin J, et al. Lower relative contribution of positive family history to colorectal cancer risk with increasing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9.28 million individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1819–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0075-y.
Nakarai C, Osawa K, Akiyama M, et al. Expression of AKR1C3 and CNN3 as markers for detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2015;15:333–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0298-1.
Vanova B, Kalman M, Jasek K, et al. Droplet digital PCR revealed high concordance between primary tumors and lymph node metastases in multiplex screening of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2019;19:219–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-019-00545-y.
Lasabova Z, Kalman M, Holubekova V, et al. Mutation analysis of POLE gene in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer revealed a rare silent variant within the endonuclease domain with potential effect on splicing. Clin Exp Med. 2019;19:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-019-00558-7.
Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer–analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200007133430201.
Li Y, Liang J, Kang S, et al. E-cadherin gene polymorphisms and haplotype associated with the occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer in Chinese. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:409–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.024.
Jeanes A, Gottardi CJ, Yap AS. Cadherins and cancer: How does cadherin dysfunction promote tumor progression? Oncogene. 2008;27:6920–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.343.
Pecina-Slaus N. Tumor suppressor gene E-cadherin and its role in normal and malignant cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2003;3:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-3-17.
Li LC, Chui RM, Sasaki M, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the E-cadherin gene promoter alters transcriptional activities. Cancer Res. 2000;60:873–6.
Porter TR, Richards FM, Houlston RS, et al. Contribution of cyclin d1 (CCND1) and E-cadherin (CDH1) polymorphisms to familial and sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21:1928–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205245.
Tan XL, Nieters A, Kropp S, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. The association of cyclin D1 G870A and E-cadherin C-160A polymorphisms with the risk of colorectal cancer in a case control study and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2573–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23363.
de Lima JM, de Souza LG, da Silva ID, Forones NM. E-cadherin and metalloproteinase-1 and -7 polymorphisms in colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2009;24:99–106.
Shin Y, Kim IJ, Kang HC, et al. A functional polymorphism (− 347 G –> GA) in the E-cadherin gene is associated with colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:2173–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgh223.
Bahadir A, Eral G, Budak M, et al. Association of clinicopathological features with E-cadherin (CDH1) gene-160 C > A promoter polymorphism in Turkish colorectal cancer patients. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15:26–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1277_16.
Pittman AM, Twiss P, Broderick P, et al. The CDH1-160C > A polymorphism is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1622–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24542.
Cattaneo F, Venesio T, Molatore S, et al. Functional analysis and case-control study of -160C/A polymorphism in the E-cadherin gene promoter: association with cancer risk. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:4627–32.
Rivu SF, Apu MNH, Shabnaz S, et al. Association of TP53 codon 72 and CDH1 genetic polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk in Bangladeshi population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;49:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2017.05.005.
Grunhage F, Jungck M, Lamberti C, et al. Association of familial colorectal cancer with variants in the E-cadherin (CDH1) and cyclin D1 (CCND1) genes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:147–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0388-6.
Wang Y, Yang H, Li L, Wang H, Zhang C, Xia X. E-cadherin (CDH1) gene promoter polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1320-7.
Sun N, Chen J, Hu G, et al. Association between the Epithelial Cadherin - 160C/A polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2017;27:347–54. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2017020525.
Geng P, Chen Y, Ou J, Yin X, Sa R, Liang H. The E-cadherin (CDH1) -C160A polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31:1070–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2011.1380.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Wenhuan Li conceived and designed the experiments. Huawen Wu performed the experiments. Lewei Xu analyzed the data. Deshuang Xiao contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Lewei Xu and Wenhuan Li wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
Informed consent
Informed consents were obtained from the study participants. The study protocol was confirmed by the Ethics Committee of the Affliated Wenling Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, the First People’s Hospital of Wenling.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Xiao, D., Wu, H. et al. The epithelial cadherin –160C/A polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer: a case–control study. Clin Exp Med 20, 73–78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-019-00586-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-019-00586-3