Skip to main content
Log in

Motion-capture technique-based interface screen displaying real-time probe position and angle in kidney ultrasonography

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professional skill is required to reproduce ultrasound images of the kidney as an optimal cross-section is easily lost with slight deviation in scanning location or angle of the probe. We developed a motion-capture technique-based interface screen that displays the real-time probe position and angle to overlap those provided beforehand. When a professional operator captured the approximate kidney image, our system recorded the relative spatial relationship between the subject and the probe. Next, an amateur operator who had no experience of clinical practice manipulated the probe only with the aid of the interface until the probe position and angle coincided with the professional ones. Eventually, amateur operators could place the probe with a deviation of distance of (x = 2.7 ± 1.2 mm, y = 3.0 ± 1.7 mm, z = 6.6 ± 1.8 mm) and angle of (Rx = 1.5 ± 0.3 degrees, Ry = 2.6 ± 1.1 degrees, Rz = 1.1 ± 0.3 degrees) from the professional goal to produce very similar cross-sectional kidney images (N = 8). Also, motion-capture technique-based evaluation of relative locations of the probe and subject body revealed difficulty in reproducing those without the interface screen navigation. In summary, our motion-capture technique-based ultrasound guide system provides operators with the opportunity to handle the probe just as another operator would beforehand. This could help in medical procedures wherein the same cross-sectional image should be repeatedly obtained. Moreover, it requires no conventional probe training for beginners and could even shift the paradigm for ultrasound probe handling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg ER. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the kidney. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1982;17(4):239–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis ES Jr, Hartman DS. Renal ultrasonography 1984: a practical overview. Radiol Clin North Am. 1984;22(2):315–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrucci I, Clementi A, Sessa C, Torrisi I, Meola M. Ultrasound and color Doppler applications in chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol. 2018;31(6):863–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelahan LC, Desser TS, Troxell ML, Kamaya A. Ultrasound assessment of acute kidney injury. Ultrasound Q. 2019;35(2):173–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luciano RL, Moeckel GW. Update on the native kidney biopsy: core curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3):404–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Hille U, Wiskirchen J, Gyapong S, Soliman AA, et al. The automated breast volume scanner (ABVS): initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:337–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueshima H, Yoshiyama S, Otake H. Probe’s fixation during ultrasound-guided central venous puncture by using the echosupport. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:204–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salden OAE, van Everdingen WM, Spee R, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJ. How I do it: feasibility of a new ultrasound probe fixator to facilitate high quality stress echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018;16(1):6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blans MJ, Bosch FH, van der Hoeven JG. The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study. Ultrasound J. 2019;11(1):26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oneyama F, Mizuno SHS, Jimbo Y, Kotani K. Study of subject’s biological information and probe operation apply to automate and semi-automate echocardiography. IEEJ Trans Electron Inf Syst. 2020;140(7):747–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corapi KM, Chen JL, Balk EM, Gordon CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Examination Committee of Criteria for “Obesity Disease” in J, Japan Society for the Study of O. New criteria for “obesity disease” in Japan. Circ J. 2002;66(11):987–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ashida R, Tanaka S, Yamanaka H, Okagaki S, Nakao K, Fukuda J, et al. The role of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of early stage pancreatic cancer: review and single-center experience. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018;9(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Okaniwa S. How does ultrasound manage pancreatic diseases? Ultrasound findings and scanning maneuvers. Gut Liver. 2020;14(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Fuyuki Oneyama for fruitful discussion. This study was supported in part by KAKENHI (18H04122) to KK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoshi Kotani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declared no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 Video 1. The motion capture-facilitated ultrasound guide system. An amateur operator handles the ultrasound probe for right kidney scanning by looking at the interface displaying the location and angle of the probe. Eventually, the operator captures a cross-sectional image of the kidney that is nearly the same with the one the professional operator obtained earlier (MP4 22453 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishi, H., Mizuno, S., Fujino, K. et al. Motion-capture technique-based interface screen displaying real-time probe position and angle in kidney ultrasonography. Clin Exp Nephrol 26, 735–740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-022-02213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-022-02213-0

Keywords

Navigation