Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular characterization of medulloblastomas with extensive nodularity (MBEN)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Neuropathologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN) is a rare histological variant of medulloblastoma (MB). These tumors are usually occurring in the first 3 years of life and are associated with good prognosis. Molecular analyses of MBEN, mostly limited to single cases or small series, have shown that they always classify as sonic hedgehog (SHH)-driven MB. Here, we have analyzed 25 MBEN through genome-wide DNA methylation, copy-number profiling and targeted next-generation sequencing. Results of these analyses were compared with molecular profiles of other SHH MB histological variants. As expected, the vast majority of MBEN (23/25) disclosed SHH-associated epigenetic signatures and mutational landscapes but, surprisingly, two MBEN were classified as Group 3/4 MB. Most MBEN classified as SHH MB displayed SHH-related and mutually exclusive mutations in either SUFU, or PTCH1, or SMO at similar frequencies. However, only SUFU mutations were also identified in the germ-line. Most of SUFU-associated MBEN eventually recurred but patients were treated successfully with second-line high-dose chemotherapy. Altogether, our data show that risk stratification even for well-recognizable histologies such as MBEN cannot rely on histology alone but should include additional molecular analyses such as methylation profiling and DNA sequencing. For all patients with “MBEN” histology, we recommend sequencing SUFU and PTCH1 in the tumor as well as in the germ-line for further clinical stratification and choice of the optimal treatment strategy upfront.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Baki MS, Boué DR, Finlay JL, Kieran MW (2017) Desmoplastic nodular medulloblastoma in young children: a management dilemma. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox222 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aristizabal P, Burns L, Rivera-Gomez R et al (2017) Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity: tailored therapy in a low-resource setting. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 39:299–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000000798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brugières L, Remenieras A, Pierron G et al (2012) High frequency of germline SUFU mutations in children with desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma younger than 3 years of age. J Clin Oncol 30:2087–2093. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavalli FMG, Remke M, Rampasek L et al (2017) Intertumoral heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 31:737–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chelliah D, Sarfo-Poku CM, Stea BD, Gardetto J, Zumwalt J (2010) Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity undergoing post-therapeutic maturation to a gangliocytoma: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:381–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garrè ML, Cama A, Bagnasco F et al (2009) Medulloblastoma variants: age-dependent occurrence and relation to Gorlin syndrome—a new clinical perspective. Clin Cancer Res 15:2463–2471. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giangaspero F, Perilongo G, Fondelli MP et al (1999) Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity: a variant with favorable prognosis. J Neurosurg 91:971–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrini-Rousseau L, Dufour C et al (2017) Germline SUFU mutation carriers and medulloblastoma: clinical characteristics, cancer risk and prognosis. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox228 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kool M, Jones DT, Jäger N et al (2014) Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell 25:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M et al (2012) Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol 123:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-0958-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Korshunov A, Chavez L, Northcott PA et al (2017) DNA-methylation profiling discloses significant advantages over NanoString method for molecular classification of medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 134(6):965–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-017-1776-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lafay-Cousin L, Smith A, Chi SN et al (2016) Clinical, pathological, and molecular characterization of infant medulloblastomas treated with sequential high-dose chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Northcott PA, Buchhalter I, Morrissy AS et al (2017) The whole-genome landscape of medulloblastoma subtypes. Nature 547:311–317. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietsch T, Schmidt R, Remke M et al (2014) Prognostic significance of clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics of medulloblastomas in the prospective HIT2000 multicenter clinical trial cohort. Acta Neuropathol 128:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1276-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutkowski S, von Hoff K, Emser A et al (2010) Survival and prognostic factors of early childhood medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28:4961–4968. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.2299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Jones DT et al (2016) Next-generation sequencing in routine brain tumor diagnostics enables an integrated diagnosis and identifies actionable targets. Acta Neuropathol 131:903–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Suresh TN, Santosh V, Yasha TC et al (2004) Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity: a variant occurring in the very young—clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of four cases. Childs Nerv Syst 20:55–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A et al (2012) Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 123(4):465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey Korshunov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korshunov, A., Sahm, F., Stichel, D. et al. Molecular characterization of medulloblastomas with extensive nodularity (MBEN). Acta Neuropathol 136, 303–313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1840-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1840-0

Keywords

Navigation