Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of age on the diagnostic performance of pancreatic ductal diameters in detecting chronic pancreatitis

  • Pancreas
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP), definition of main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilation is challenging due to lack of commonly accepted normal values. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of MPD diameters to detect CP including the impact of age.

Methods

274 patients with ERCP-verified CP and 262 healthy controls were included. All had magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with measurement of MPD diameters in the pancreatic head, body, and tail. CP disease stage was defined as patients with and without functional (exocrine and/or endocrine) impairment. Diagnostic performance of MPD diameter and corresponding cut-offs values to diagnose CP were determined, including an age-stratified analysis.

Results

In healthy controls, an effect of age on MPD diameters was seen for the pancreatic head (P < 0.001), body (P = 0.006), and tail (P = 0.03). Patients with CP had increased MPD diameter compared to controls (all segments P < 0.001). Increased pancreatic head MPD diameter was seen in patients with functional pancreatic impairment compared to patients without (P = 0.03). The diagnostic performance of MPD diameter to detect CP was high (all segments ROC-AUC > 0.92). The optimal pancreatic MPD diameter cut-off values for diagnosing CP were: < 40 years: 2.0(head) and 1.8(body) mm; 40–60 years: 2.4(head) and 2.1(body) mm; > 60 years: 2.7(head) and 2.1(body) mm.

Conclusion

Age is an important factor when evaluating the diameter of the pancreatic ductal system. Our findings challenge the existing reported thresholds for defining an abnormal duct diameter and point at age-stratified assessments as an integrated part of future imaging-based diagnostic and grading systems for CP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarner M, Cotton PB (1984) Classification of pancreatitis . Gut 25:756–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider A, Löhr JM, Singer M V. (2007) The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis: Introduction of a unifying classification system based on a review of previous classifications of the disease. J. Gastroenterol.

  3. Schreyer AG, Jung M, Riemann JF, et al (2014) S3 guideline for chronic pancreatitis - diagnosis, classification and therapy for the radiologist . Rofo 186:1002–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frøkjær JB, Akisik F, Farooq A, et al (2018) Guidelines for the Diagnostic Cross Sectional Imaging and Severity Scoring of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pancreatology 18:764–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madzak A, Olesen SS, Wathle GK, et al (2016) Secretin-Stimulated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Benign Pancreatic Disorders: Systematic Review and Proposal for a Standardized Protocol. Pancreas 45:. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000606

  6. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Curioni S, et al (2009) Pancreatic ductal abnormalities documented by secretin-enhanced MRCP in asymptomatic subjects with chronic pancreatic hyperenzymemia. Am J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariani A, Arcidiacono PG, Curioni S, et al (2009) Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology. Dig Liver Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2009.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Afzelius P, Fallentin EM, Larsen S, et al (2010) Pancreatic function and morphology in Sjögren’s syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521003642542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen TM, Nilsson M, Gram M, Frøkjær JB (2013) Morphological and functional evaluation of chronic pancreatitis with magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 19:. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7241

  10. Balci C (2011) MRI assessment of chronic pancreatitis . Diagn.Interv.Radiol. 17:249–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tirkes T, Akisik F, Tann M, Balci NC (2009) Imaging of the pancreas with secretin enhancement. Top Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181b483f0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Czakó L, Takács T, Morvay Z, et al (2004) Diagnostic role of secretin-enhanced MRCP in patients with unsuccessful ERCP. World J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.3034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikkola J, Rinta-Kiikka I, Räty S, et al (2014) Pancreatic Morphological Changes in Long-Term Follow-Up after Initial Episode of Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2279-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matos C, Metens T, Devière J, et al (1997) Pancreatic duct: Morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tirkes T, Sandrasegaran K, Sanyal R, et al (2013) Secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography: Spectrum of findings. Radiographics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.337125014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trout AT, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD, et al (2013) Does secretin add value in pediatric magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2561-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, et al (2001) Functional assessment of pancreatic parenchyma after secretin administration using serial T2-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V, et al (2004) Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balci NC, Momtahen AJ, Akduman EI, et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted MRI of the Pancreas. Correlation with Secretin Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test (ePFT). Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.002

  20. Pessaux P, Aube C, Lebigot J, et al (2002) Permeability and functionality of pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation. J Am Coll Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01126-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dasyam AK, Shah ZK, Tirkes T, et al (2019) Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis: why it is necessary and how it can be done. Abdom. Radiol.

  22. Hastier P, Buckley MJM, Dumas R, et al (1998) A study of the effect of age on pancreatic duct morphology. Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70129-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav D, et al (2014) American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas 43:1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Edge MD, Hoteit M, Patel AP, et al (2007) Clinical significance of main pancreatic duct dilation on computed tomography: Single and double duct dilation. World J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tirkes T, Shah ZK, Takahashi N, et al (2019) Reporting Standards for Chronic Pancreatitis by Using CT, MRI, and MR Cholangiopancreatography: The Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer. Radiology 290:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Q, Swensson J, Hu M, et al (2019) Distribution and correlation of pancreatic gland size and duct diameters on MRCP in patients without evidence of pancreatic disease. Abdom Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1879-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sato T, Ito K, Tamada T, et al (2012) Age-related changes in normal adult pancreas: MR imaging evaluation. Eur J Radiol.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kipp JP, Olesen SS, Mark EB, et al (2018) Normal pancreatic volume in adults is influenced by visceral fat, vertebral body width and age. Abdom Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1793-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Andersen PL, Madzak A, Olesen SS, et al (2018) Quantification of parenchymal calcifications in chronic pancreatitis: relation to atrophy, ductal changes, fibrosis and clinical parameters. Scand J Gastroenterol 53:. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2017.1415372

  30. Dominguez-Muñoz JE (2018) Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Brøndum Frøkjær.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frøkjær, J.B., Olesen, S.S., Drewes, A.M. et al. Impact of age on the diagnostic performance of pancreatic ductal diameters in detecting chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol 45, 1488–1494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02522-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02522-6

Keywords

Navigation