Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to clarify predictive factors that may cause postoperative infectious complications after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS). In a 4-year prospective study, charts of patients who underwent f-URS between January 2014 and January 2018 for renal stone(s) in a tertiary academic center were reviewed. A standardized f-URS procedure was performed for all patients. Post-operative infectious complications including fever, sepsis and septic shock were categorized into same group. Patients with and without infectious complications were compared in the terms of preoperative, operative and post operative characteristics. In total, 463 patients who did not face infectious complications and 31 patients who faced infectious complications were enrolled into the study. The mean age was significantly lower in patients who did face infectious complications (34.8 vs 44.7 years old, p < 0.001). On the other hand, presence of renal abnormality was significantly more common in patients with infectious complications (12.3% vs 35.5%, p < 0.001). The mean operation time was 65.3 min in patients with infectious complications and significantly longer when compared with patients who did not face infectious complication (47.8 min, p < 0.001). Stone-free rate was significantly higher in patients without infectious complications (85.3% vs 77.5, p = 0.009). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that longer operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and age ≤ 40 years were predictive factors for infectious complications following f-URS. The present study has demonstrated that operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and patients with ≤ 40 years were significantly associated with infectious complications following f-URS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

f-URS:

Flexible ureterorenoscopy

SWL:

Shock wave lithotripsy

PNL:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

CT:

Computerized tomography

BMI:

Body mass index

ASA score:

American Society of Anaesthesiologists Score

References

  1. Kılıç O, Akand M, Van Cleynenbreugel B (2017) Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones-Part 2. Turk J Urol 43:252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knoll T, Jessen JP, Honeck P et al (2011) Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10–30 mm size. World J Urol 29:755–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai WS, Assimos D (2016) The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Rev Urol 18:10–14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma K, Sankhwar SN, Goel A, Singh V, Sharma P, Garg Y (2016) Factors predicting infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann 8:434–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Celia A, Paccaduscio A, Schips L, Proietti S, Breda A, Giusti G (2016) Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol 34:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M et all (2016) Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int Urol Nephrol 48:1757–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O (2010) Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens. J Endourol 24:1583–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, Huang Y (2013) RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2–3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 41:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariani AJ (2007) Combined electrohydraulic and holmium: YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol 177:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan S, Gong B, Hao Z, Zhang L, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Liang C (2015) Risk factors of infectious complications following flexible ureteroscope with a holmium laser: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:11252–11259

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karami H, Mazloomfard MM, Golshan A et al (2010) Does age affect outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol J 7:17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okeke Z, Smith AD, Labate G et al (2012) Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients. J Endourol 26:996–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K, Li X, Chen W, Yang H (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever. J Urol 22:2147–2151

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ugurlu IM, Akman T, Binbay M et al (2015) Outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with anomalous kidneys. Urolithiasis 43:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bozkurt OF, Tepeler A, Sninsky B et al (2014) Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of kidney stone within pelvic ectopic kidney. Urology 84:1285–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atis G, Resorlu B, Gurbuz C, Arikan O, Ozyuvali E, Unsal A, Caskurlu T (2013) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys. Urolithiasis 41:79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L et al (2016) Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol 30:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J et al (2003) Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 61:713–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I (1993) Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol 149:1576–1585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OF: project development, manuscript writing. AA: data analyzing. CA: manuscript editing. SO, OM: data collection. SM: manuscript editing, data collection. OM: data collection, data management.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faruk Ozgor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

Informed consent was obtained pre-operatively from all of the patients who were included in our study.

Ethical compliance

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozgor, F., Sahan, M., Cubuk, A. et al. Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis 47, 481–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1098-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1098-y

Keywords

Navigation