Skip to main content
Log in

Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Advancements in the endourological equipment have made retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) an attractive, widespread technique, capable of competing with traditional shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Since the complication rate is generally low, even less is known about dramatic and fatal complications after RIRS.

Methods

We performed a survey asking 11 experienced endourologists to review their RIRS series and report the cases of mortality to their best knowledge.

Results

Six urologists reported on six fatal cases. In three cases, a history of urinary tract infections was present. Four patients died from urosepsis, one due to an anesthetic and one due to hemorrhagic complication. The use of ureteral access sheath was not common.

Conclusion

Even respecting the standards of care, it may happen that physicians are occasionally tempted to overdo for their patients, sometimes skipping safety rules with an inevitable increase in risks. Despite the fact that RIRS has become a viable option for the treatment of the majority of kidney stones, its complication rates remain low. Nevertheless, rare fatal events may occur, especially in complex cases with a history of urinary tract infections, and advanced neurological diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giusti G, Proietti S, Peschechera R et al (2015) Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances. World J Urol 33(2):257–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fall B, Mouracade P, Bergerat S, Saussine C (2014) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for kidney and ureter stone: indications, morbidity and outcome. Prog Urol 24(12):771–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert M, Drianno N, Marotta J, Delbos O, Guiter J, Grasset D (1997) The value of retrograde ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of bulky kidney calculi. Prog Urol 7(1):35–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Watson JM, Chang C, Pattaras JG, Ogan K (2011) Same session bilateral ureteroscopy is safe and efficacious. J Urol 185(1):170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2015) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association Guidelines. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/22%20Urolithiasis_LR.pdf. last Access on 15 Jan 2015

  6. Jung H, Nørby B, Frimodt-Møller PC, Osther PJ (2008) Endoluminal isoproterenol irrigation decreases renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureterorenoscopy: a clinical randomized, controlled study. Eur Urol 54(6):1404–1413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McAleer IM, Kaplan GW, Bradley JS, Carroll SF, Griffith DP (2003) Endotoxin content in renal calculi. J Urol 169(5):1813–1814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S (2007) Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 21:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salluh JI, Nobre V, Povoa P (2014) Using procalcitonin to guide antimicrobial duration in sepsis: asking the same questions will not bring different answers. Crit Care 18(3):142–144

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng J, Li Q, Fu W et al (2015) Procalcitonin as an early diagnostic and monitoring tool in urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 43(1):41–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearle M (2015) My approach to using prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal with a negative baseline urine culture. Published in urology expert opinion. http://www.practiceupdate.com/content/my-approach-to-using-prophylactic-antibiotics-in-patients-undergoing-ureteroscopic-stone-removal-with-a-negative-baseline-urine-culture/23311

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kimberlee Ann Manzi for professionally reviewing the linguistic style of the manuscript.

Author’s contribution

Dr. Cindolo, Castellan, Giusti, Scoffone organised the project and developed the protocol. Dr. Cindolo, Cracco, Paccaduscio, Breda, Celia, Proietti did the data collection. The analysis of he data was done by Dr. Castellan, Cindolo, Cracco. Castellan, Schips, Giusti wrote and edited the manuscript . Dr. Scoffone, Giusti, Breda, Schips supervised the process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Cindolo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Guido Giusti is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Porges-Coloplast, Karl Storz. Cesare Mario Scoffone is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Porges-Coloplast, Karl Storz. Alberto Breda is a consultant for Cook Medical, Rocamed, Karl Storz.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cindolo, L., Castellan, P., Scoffone, C.M. et al. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol 34, 305–310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0

Keywords

Navigation