Abstract
Vertical and horizontal spheroidal boundary-value problems (BVPs), i.e., determination of the external gravitational potential from the components of the gravitational gradient on the spheroid, are discussed in this article. The gravitational gradient is decomposed into the series of the vertical and horizontal vector spheroidal harmonics, before being orthogonalized in a weighted sense by two different approaches. The vertical and horizontal spheroidal BVPs are then formulated and solved in the spectral and spatial domains. Both orthogonalization methods provide the same analytical solutions for the vertical spheroidal BVP, and give distinct, but equivalent, analytical solutions for the horizontal spheroidal BVP. A closed-loop simulation is performed to test the correctness of the analytical solutions, and we investigate analytical properties of the sub-integral kernels. The systematic treatment of the spheroidal BVPs and the resulting mathematical equations extend the theoretical apparatus of geodesy and of the potential theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardalan AA (1999) High resolution regional geoid computation in the World Geodetic Datum 2000 based upon collocation of linearized observational functionals of the type GPS, gravity potential and gravity intensity. PhD Thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany, 239 pp
Ardalan AA, Safari A (2005) Global height datum unification: a new approach in gravity potential space. J Geod 79:512–523
Ardestani VE, Martinec Z (2001) Ellipsoidal Stokes boundary-value problem with ellipsoidal corrections in the boundary condition. Stud Geophys Geod 45:109–126
Barzaghi R, Tselfes N, Tziavos IN, Vergos GS (2008) Geoid and high resolution sea surface topography modelling in the mediterranean from gravimetry, altimetry and GOCE data: evaluation by simulation. J Geod 83:751–772
Bjerhammar A (1962) On an explicit solution of the gravimetric boundary value problem for an ellipsoidal surface of reference. Final technical report, Geodetic Division, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 100 pp
Bölling C, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geod 79:300–330
Claessens SJ (2006) Solutions to ellipsoidal boundary value problems for gravity field modelling. PhD Dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, 220 pp
Claessens SJ, Featherstone WE (2008) The Meissl scheme for the geodetic ellipsoid. J Geod 82:513–522
Eshagh M (2011) The effect of spatial truncation error on the integral inversion of satellite gravity gradiometry data. Adv Space Res 45:1238–1247
Fei Z (2000) Refinements of geodetic boundary value problem solutions. PhD Thesis, Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 198 pp
Freeden W, Gerhards C (2013) Geomathematically oriented potential theory. In: Taft EJ, Nashed Z (eds) Pure and Applied Mathematics, A Series of Monographs and Textbooks. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 452 pp
Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1994) Tensor spherical harmonics and tensor spherical splines. Manuscr Geod 19:70–100
Freeden W, Schreiner M (2009) Spherical functions of mathematical geosciences. A scalar, vectorial, and tensorial setup. In: Hutter K (ed) Advances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 602 pp
Fukushima T (2012a) Numerical computation of spherical harmonics of arbitrary degree and order by extending exponent of floating points numbers. J Geod 86:271–285
Fukushima T (2012b) Numerical computation of spherical harmonics of arbitrary degree and order by extending exponent of floating point numbers: II first-, second-, and third-order derivatives. J Geod 86:1019–1028
Fukushima T (2013) Recursive computation of oblate spheroidal harmonics of the second kind and their first-, second-, and third-order derivatives. J Geod 87:303–309
Galassi M, Davies J, Theiler J, Gough B, Jungman G, Alken P, Booth M, Rossi F, Ulerich R (2013) GNU Scientific Library. Reference Manual, Edition 1.16, for GSL Version 1.13, 17 July 2013, 514 pp
Garabedian P (1953) Orthogonal harmonic polynomials. Pac J Math 3:585–603
Grafarend EW (2001) The spherical horizontal and spherical vertical boundary value problem—vertical deflections and geoid undulations—the completed Meissl diagram. J Geod 75:363–390
Grafarend EW (2011) Space gradiometry: tensor-valued ellipsoidal harmonics, the datum problem and application of the Lusternik–Schnirelmann category to construct a minimum atlas. Int J Geomath 1:145–166
Grafarend EW (2015) The reference figure of the rotating earth in geometry and gravity space and an attempt to generalize the celebrated Runge–Walsh approximation theorem for irregular surfaces. Int J Geomath 6:101–140
Grafarend EW, Finn G, Ardalan AA (2006) Ellipsoidal vertical deflections and ellipsoidal gravity disturbance: case studies. Stud Geophys Geod 50:1–57
Grafarend EW, Heck B, Knickmeyer EH (1985) The free versus fixed geodetic boundary value problem for different combinations of geodetic observables. Bull Géod 59:11–32
Haagmans R, de Min E, van Gelderen M (1993) Fast evaluation of convolution integral on the sphere using 1D-FFT and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes integral. Manuscr Geod 18:227–241
Heck B, Seitz K (2003) Solution of the linearized geodetic boundary value problem for an ellipsoid boundary to order \(e^3\). J Geod 77:182–192
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, p 364
Hobson EW (1965) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, p 500
Holmes S, Featherstone W (2002) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions. J Geod 76:279–299
Holota P (1983a) Mixed boundary value problems in physical geodesy. In: Holota P (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium: figure of the earth, the moon and other planets, September 20–25, 1982, Prague, Czech Republic, Monograph Series of the Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 253–285
Holota P (1983b) The altimetry-gravimetry boundary value problem I: linearization, Friedrichs’ inequality. Boll Geod Sci Affini 1:13–32
Holota P (1983c) The altimetry-gravimetry boundary value problem II: weak solution, V-ellipticity. Boll Geod Sci Affini 1:69–84
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2014) Reproducing kernel and Neumann’s function for the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution: application in gravity field studies. Stud Geophys Geod 58:505–535
Huang J, Vaníček P, Novák P (2000) An alternative algorithm to FFT for the numerical evaluation of Stokes’s integral. Stud Geophys Geod 44:374–380
Jekeli C (1988) The exact transformation between ellipsoidal and spherical expansions. Manuscr Geod 13:106–113
Jiang T, Wang YM (2016) On the spectral combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data for local gravimetric geoid computation. J Geod 90:1405–1418
Jinghai Y, Xiaoping W (1997) The solution of mixed boundary value problems with the reference ellipsoid as boundary. J Geod 71:454–460
Kern M, Schwarz P, Sneeuw N (2003) A study on the combination of satellite, airborne, and terrestrial gravity data. J Geod 77:217–225
Koch KR (1969) Solution of the geodetic boundary value problem for a reference ellipsoid. J Geophys Res 74:3796–3803
Lowes FJ, Winch DE (2012) Orthogonality of harmonic potentials and fields in spheroidal and ellipsoidal coordinates: application to geomagnetism and geodesy. Geophys J Int 191:491–507
Martensen E (1968) Potentialtheorie. Teubner-Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany
Martinec Z (1997) Solution to the Stokes boundary-value problem on an ellipsoid of revolution. Stud Geophys Geod 41:103–129
Martinec Z (2003) Green’s function solution to spherical gradiometric boundary-value problems. J Geod 77:41–49
Martinec Z, Grafarend EW (1997) Construction of Green’s function to the Dirichlet boundary-value problem for the Laplace equation on an ellipsoid of revolution. J Geod 71:562–570
Mather RS (1973) A solution of the geodetic boundary value problem to order \(e^3\). Report No. X-592-73-11, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, 136 pp
Mayrhofer R, Pail R (2012) Future satellite gravity field missions: feasibility study of post-Newtonian method. In: Kenyon S, Pacino M, Marti U (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth, IAG Symposium, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–238
Mazurova EM, Yurkina MI (2011) Use of Green’s function for determining the disturbing potential of an ellipsoidal Earth. Stud Geophys Geod 55:455–464
Meissl P (1971) A study of covariance functions related to the Earth’s disturbing potential. Report No. 151, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, 86 pp
Molodenskii MS, Eremeev VF, Yurkina MI (1962) Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. The Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA, 248 pp
Moritz H (1989) Advanced physical geodesy, 2nd edn. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, p 500
Moritz H (2000) Geodetic reference system 1980. J Geod 74:128–133
Najafi-Alamdary M, Ardalan AA, Emadi S-R (2012) Ellipsoidal Neumann geodetic boundary-value problem based on surface gravity disturbances: case study of Iran. Stud Geophys Geod 56:153–170
Nesvadba O, Holota P (2016) An ellipsoidal analogue to Hotine’s kernel: accuracy and applicability. In: Jin S, Barzaghi R (eds) IGFS 2014, IAG Symposia, vol 144. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 93–100
Novák P (2003) Geoid determination using one-step integration. J Geod 77:193–206
Novák P, Šprlák M, Tenzer R, Pitoňák M (2017) Integral formulas for transformation of potential field parameters in geosciences. Earth Sci Rev 164:208–231
Novák P, Vaníček P, Véronneau M, Holmes S, Featherstone WE (2001) On the accuracy of modified Stokes’s integration in high-frequency gravimetric geoid determination. J Geod 74:644–654
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res (Solid Earth) 117:B04406
Petrovskaya MS, Vershkov AN (2008) Development of the second-order derivatives of the Earth’s potential in the local north-oriented reference frame in orthogonal series of modified spherical harmonics. J Geod 82:929–944
Plag H-P, Altamimi Z, Bettadpur S, Beutler G, Beyerle G, Cazenave A, Crossley D, Donnellan A, Forsberg R, Gross R, Hinderer J, Komjathy A, Ma C, Mannucci AJ, Noll C, Nothnagel A, Pavlis EC, Pearlman M, Poli P, Schreiber U, Senior K, Woodworth PL, Zerbini S, Zuffada C (2009) The goals, achievements, and tools of modern geodesy. In: Plag H-P, Pearlman M (eds) Global Geodetic Observing System, Meeting the Requirements of a Global Society on a Changing Planet in 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–88
Rexer M, Hirt C, Claessens S, Tenzer R (2016) Layer-based modelling of the Earth’s gravitational potential up to 10-km scale in spherical harmonics in spherical and ellipsoidal approximation. Surv Geophys 37:1035–1074
Ritter S (1998) The nullfield method for the ellipsoidal Stokes problem. J Geod 72:101–106
Safari A, Ardalan AA, Grafarend EW (2005) A new ellipsoidal gravimetric, satellite altimetry and astronomic boundary value problem, a case study: the geoid of Iran. J Geodyn 39:545–568
Sansò F (1995) The long road from the measurements to boundary value problems of physical geodesy. Manuscr Geod 20:326–344
Sjöberg LE (2003) Ellipsoidal corrections to order \(e^2\) of geopotential coefficients and Stokes’ formula. J Geod 77:139–147
Sjöberg LE, Eshagh M (2012) A theory on geoid modeling by spectral combination of data from satellite gravity gradiometry, terrestrial gravity and an Earth gravitational model. Acta Geod Geophys 47:13–28
Šprlák M, Novák P (2016) Spherical gravitational curvature boundary-value problem. J Geod 90:727–739
Thong NC (1993) Untersuchung zur Lösungen der fixen gravimetrischen Randwertprobleme mittels sphäroidaler und Greenscher Funktione. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 399, München, Germany, 107 pp
Torge W, Müller J (2012) Geodesy, 4th edn. De Gruyter Inc., Berlin, p 433
van Gelderen M, Rummel R (2001) The solution of the general geodetic boundary value problem by least squares. J Geod 75:1–11
Vaníček P, Huang J, Novák P, Pagiatakis S, Véronneau M, Martinec Z, Featherstone WE (1999) Determination of the boundary values for the Stokes–Helmert problem. J Geod 73:180–192
Wenzel H-G (1998) Ultra-high degree geopotential models GPM98A, B, and C to degree 1800. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the International Gravity Commission and International Geoid Commission, 7–12 September 1998, Trieste, Italy
Wild-Pfeiffer F (2008) A comparison of different mass elements for use in gravity gradiometry. J Geod 82:637–653
Witsch KJ (1985) On a free boundary value problem of physical geodesy, I (Uniqueness). Math Methods Appl Sci 7:269–289
Witsch KJ (1986) On a free boundary value problem of physical geodesy, II (Existence). Math Methods Appl Sci 8:1–22
Yu J-H (2004) Integral solution of the Dirichlet’s boundary value problem with the ellipsoid boundary under the accuracy of O(\(T^2\)). Chin J Geophys 47:86–93
Yu J, Cao H (1996) Elliptical harmonic series and the original Stokes’ problem with the boundary of the reference ellipsoid. J Geod 70:431–439
Yu J, Jekeli C, Zhu M (2003) Analytical solutions of the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary-value problems with an ellipsoidal boundary. J Geod 76:653–667
Zagrebin DV (1956) Die Theorie des regularisierten Geoids, vol 9. Veröffentlichung des Geodätischen Instituts Potsdam, Potsdam (German Translation of: Teoriia Reguliarizirovannogo Geoida. Trudy Instituta Teorecticheskol Astronomii 1: 87–222)
Zhu Z (1981) The Stokes problem for the ellipsoid using ellipsoidal kernels. Report No. 319, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 19 pp
Acknowledgements
Thoughtful and constructive comments of Dr. Peter Holota and the other two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also extended to the editor-in-chief Prof. Jürgen Kusche and the responsible editor Prof. Wolfgang Keller for handling our manuscript. We also thank Dr. Lloyd Pilgrim for reading and correcting the revised version of the manuscripts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Equivalence of the analytical solutions for the horizontal spheroidal BVP
Equivalence of the analytical solutions for the horizontal spheroidal BVP
In this Appendix, we show that the two distinct analytical solutions of the horizontal spheroidal BVP, see Eqs. (43), (44), and (46), are mathematically equivalent. We restrict the proof only to the spectral domain. Implications and conclusions are identical also in the spatial domain.
The starting point of the proof is Eq. (44), which can be written as follows:
The last equation was obtained with the help of the formula:
which can be deduced from Eq. (32) by considering \(u' = b_0\) and \(v(b_0) = a_0\). In addition, we exploited the partial fraction expansion of the term in front of the integral of Eq. (44), i.e.:
The addition of the second integral with the third one in Eq. (53) reads:
The left-hand side of Eq. (56) results from inserting Eqs. (18) and (19), i.e., the spheroidal harmonic expansions of the horizontal gravitational gradient components \(V^{\beta }\) and \(V^{\lambda }\), into Eq. (53). The interchange of the order of summation and integration (assuming the uniform convergence of the series expansion) and the application of Eq. (54) lead to the expression after the first equality. The expression after the second equality is obtained by making use of the orthogonality relationship of Eq. (25) and another one defined as:
Simple algebraic operations gave the last two equalities of Eq. (56).
Taking into account the result of Eq. (56), the only nonzero term of Eq. (53) is the first integral. This is identical with the spheroidal harmonic analysis by Eq. (43). Thus, we have proved that Eqs. (43) and (44) are mathematically equivalent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprlák, M., Tangdamrongsub, N. Vertical and horizontal spheroidal boundary-value problems. J Geod 92, 811–826 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1096-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1096-9