Abstract
One of the challenges for geoid determination is the combination of heterogeneous gravity data. Because of the distinctive spectral content of different data sets, spectral combination is a suitable candidate for its solution. The key to have a successful combination is to determine the proper spectral weights, or the error degree variances of each data set. In this paper, the error degree variances of terrestrial and airborne gravity data at low degrees are estimated by the aid of a satellite gravity model using harmonic analysis. For higher degrees, the error covariances are estimated from local gravity data first, and then used to compute the error degree variances. The white and colored noise models are also used to estimate the error degree variances of local gravity data for comparisons. Based on the error degree variances, the spectral weights of satellite gravity models, terrestrial and airborne gravity data are determined and applied for geoid computation in Texas area. The computed gravimetric geoid models are tested against an independent, highly accurate geoid profile of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey 2011 (GSVS11). The geoid computed by combining satellite gravity model GOCO03S and terrestrial (land and DTU13 altimetric) gravity data agrees with GSVS11 to ±1.1 cm in terms of standard deviation along a line of 325 km. After incorporating the airborne gravity data collected at 11 km altitude, the standard deviation is reduced to ±0.8 cm. Numerical tests demonstrate the feasibility of spectral combination in geoid computation and the contribution of airborne gravity in an area of high quality terrestrial gravity data. Using the GSVS11 data and the spectral combination, the degree of correctness of the error spectra and the quality of satellite gravity models can also be revealed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ågren J (2004) Regional geoid determination methods for the era of satellite gravimetry. PhD dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology
Andersen O, Knudsen P, Kenyon S, Factor J, Holmes SA (2013) The DTU13 Global marine gravity field—first evaluation. In: Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting, Boulder, Colorado
Bae TS, Lee J, Kwon JH, Hong CK (2012) Update of the precision geoid determination in Korea. Geophys Prospect 60(2):555–571
Barzaghi R, Borghi A, Keller K, Forsberg R, Giori I, Loretti I, Olesen AV, Stenseng L (2009) Airborne gravity tests in the Italian area to improve the geoid model of Italy. Geophys Prospect 57(3):625–632
Bayoud FA, Sideris MG (2003) Two different methodologies for geoid determination from surface and airborne gravity data. Geophys J Int 155:914–922
Brockmann JM, Zehentner N, Höck E, Pail R, Loth I, Mayer-Gürr T, Schuh W (2014) EGM_TIM_RL05: an independent geoid with centimeter accuracy purely based on the GOCE mission. Geophys Res Lett 41(21):8089–8099
Bruinsma SL, Förste C, Abrikosov O, Marty JC, Rio MH, Mulet S, Bonvalot S (2013) The new ESA satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach. Geophys Res Lett 40(13):3607–3612
Bürki B, Müller A, Kahle H-G (2004) DIADEM: the new digital astronomical deflection measuring system for high-precision measurements of deflections of the vertical at ETH Zurich. IAG GGSM2004 Meeting in Porto, Portugal
Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45:RG2004. doi:10.1029/2005RG000183
Flury J, Rummel R (2009) On the geoid–quasigeoid separation inmountain areas. J Geod 83:829–847
Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. In: Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, #355. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Forsberg R, Olesen A, Bastos L, Gidskehaug A, Meyer U, Timmen L (2000) Airborne geoid determination. Earth Planets Space 52:863–866
Forsberg R, Sahrum S, Alshamsi A, Din AHM (2012) Coastal geoid improvement using airborne gravimetric data in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Phys Sci 7(45):6012–6023
Gleason DM (1988) Comparing ellipsoidal corrections to the transformation between the geopotential’s spherical and ellipsoidal spectrums. Manuscript Geodaetica 13:114–129
Goiginger H, Rieser D, Mayer-Guerr T, Pail R, Schuh W.-D, Jäggi A, Maier A (2011) The combined satellite-only global gravity field model GOCO02S. European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2011, Wien
GRAV-D Science Team (2012) Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) Project, Airborne Gravity Data; Block CS03. Available 10/5/2014. http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/data_products.shtml
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physics geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco
Hsiao YS, Hwang C (2010) Topography-assisted downward continuation of airborne gravity: an application for geoid determination in Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 21(3):1–11
Hwang C, Hsiao YS, Shih HC, Yang M, Chen KH, Forsberg R, Olesen AV (2007) Geodetic and geophysical results from a Taiwan airborne gravity survey: data reduction and accuracy assessment. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 112:B04407. doi:10.1029/2005JB004220
Jekeli C (1988) The exact transformation between ellipsoidal and spherical harmonic expansions. Manuscripta Geodaetica 13(1):106–113
Jekeli C, Yang HJ, Kwon JH (2013) Geoid determination in South Korea from a combination of terrestrial and airborne gravity anomaly data. J Korean Soc Surv Geod Photogramm Cartograp 31(6–2):567–576
Kusche J, Klees R (2002) Regularization of gravity field estimation from satellite gravity gradients. J Geod 76:359–368
Marchenko AN, Barthelmes F, Meyer U, Schwintzer P (2001) Regional geoid determination: an application to airborne gravity data in the Skagerrak. Scientific technical report STR. Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, p. 48
Mayer-Gürr T et al. (2012) The new combined satellite only model GOCO03s. Presentation at GGHS 2012, Venice, 2012
Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe
Novák P, Heck B (2002) Downward continuation and geoid determination based on band-limited airborne gravity data. J Geod 76:269–278
Novák P, Kern M, Schwarz KP, Sideris MG, Heck B, Ferguson S, Hammada Y, Wei M (2003) On geoid determination from airborne gravity. J Geod 76:510–522
Olesen AV (2003) Improved airborne scalar vector gravimetry regional gravity field mapping and geoid determination. Technical report, National Survey and Cadastre (KMS), Copenhagen, Denmark
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon S, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res 117:B04406
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, and Factor JK (2013) Correction to “the development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008)”. J Geophys Res 118(4):2633
Picard RR, Cook RD (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):575–583
Rapp RH, Pavlis NK (1990) The development and analysis of geopotential coefficient models to spherical harmonic degree 360. J Geophys Res 95(B13):21885–21911
Saleh J, Li XP, Wang YM, Roman DR, Smith DA (2013) Error analysis of the NGS’ surface gravity database. J Geod 87:203–221
Schwarz KP, Li Y (1996) What can airborne gravimetry contribute to geoid determination? J Geophys Res 101(B8):17873–17881
Sjöberg LE (1981) Least-squares combination of satellite and terrestrial data in physical geodesy. Ann Geophys 37:25–30
Sjöberg LE (1986) Comparison of some methods of modifying Stokes’ formula. Boll Geod Sci Affini 45(2):229–248
Smith DA, Holmes SA, Li XP, Guillaume S, Wang YM, Bürki B, Roman DR, Damiani TM (2013) Confirming regional 1 cm differential geoid accuracy from airborne gravimetry: the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011. J Geod 87:885–907
Tikhonov AN (1963) Regularization of incorrectly posed problems. Sov Math Dokl 4:1035–1038
Tscherning CC, Rapp R (1974) Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations, and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree variance models. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, #208. The Ohio State University, Columbus
Tscherning CC, Knudsen P, Forsberg R (1991) Description of the GRAVSOFT package. Technical report, Geophysical Institute, University of Copenhagen
Wang YM, Roman DR, Saleh J (2007) Analytical downward and upward continuation based on the method of domain decomposition and local functions. In: Peiliang X, Jingnan L, Athanasios D (eds) VI Hotine-Marussi symposium on theoretical and computational geodesy series, vol 132. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, pp 356–360
Wang YM, Saleh J, Roman DR (2012) The US gravimetric geoid of 2009 (USGG2009): model development and evaluation. J Geod 86:165–180
Wenzel HG (1982) Geoid computation by least-squares spectral combination using intergral kernels. In: Proceedings of the general IAG meeting, Tokyo, pp 438–453
Acknowledgments
Tao Jiang is funded by the China Scholarship Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41204008). NGS also provided partially support for this study. The authors thank Mr. Jarir Saleh for his constructive suggestions and discussions. Drs. Jonas Ågren, Jianliang Huang, Simon Holmes and Xiaopeng Li are greatly appreciated for their constructive comments and discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, T., Wang, Y.M. On the spectral combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data for local gravimetric geoid computation. J Geod 90, 1405–1418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0932-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0932-7