Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper empirically assesses the effect of liberalisation and competition on innovation in the postal sector. The analysis is restricted to end-to-end competition. The effect on the incentives to innovate of letter volume, public ownership and other control variables is also tested. Data on liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector is collected for seventeen European countries over eleven years. Three measures are used as proxies for innovation: (1) an innovation index based on a survey conducted for this purpose; (2) the accumulated number of innovations (based on the same survey); and (3) labour productivity. We also develop a liberalisation index to measure the percentage of market liberalised (in terms of letter volume). Several models are estimated by GLS. In general, the models estimated have a high explanatory power. We find evidence that market liberalisation has a positive effect on innovation and that an increase in the market share of the competitors stimulates the investment in innovation, at least until the market share of the competitors reaches a certain threshold. Letter volume is also significant and has a positive impact on innovation. GDP per capita turns out to be significant and has a positive relationship with innovation in all the models estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 701–728

  • Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RThe rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Arthur D. Little Limited (2004) Technology and innovation in the postal sector—a competitive market review

  • Baumol W, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1982) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Griffith R, Reenen JV (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66: 529–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND J Econ 31: 549–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone J (2001) Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. Int J Indus Org 19: 705–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone J, Dijk TV (1998) Competition and innovation. De Economist 3: 445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesnetzagentur (2006) Ninth market study—Letter market. Mainz

  • Cellini R, Lambertini L (2005) R&D Incentives under bertrand competition: a differential game. In: Horacek P, Simand M, Zitek P (eds) Preprints of the 16th IFAC world congress Prague

  • Eccles R, Kuipers P (2006) A comparative study of the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. In: Topics in regulatory economics and policy

  • ECORYS (2005) Development of competition in the European postal sector. Rotterdam

  • Felisberto C (2007) The effect of competition on innovation in the network industries. In: 6th conference on applied infrastructure research. TU Berlin

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPC (2007) Postal regulatory database, country directory 2007—version 6

  • Jamasb T, Pollitt MG (2011) Electricity sector liberalisation and innovation: an analysis of the UK’s patenting activities. Res Policy 40(2): 309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1975) Market structure and innovation: a survey. J Econ Lit 13: 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1976) On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity. Quart J Econ 90: 245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Wilde LL (1980) Market structure and innovation: a reformulation. Quart J Econ 94: 429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quart J Econ 93: 395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NERA (2004) Economics of postal services. London

  • Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J Polit Econ 104: 724–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse (1997) Employment trends in the European postal sector

  • Price Waterhouse Coopers (1997) Employment trends in the European postal sector

  • Romer P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98: S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer FM (1967) Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. Quart J Econ 81: 359–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WIK: (2004) Main developments in the European postal sector. Bad Honnef, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • WIK: (2005) The evolution of the regulatory model for european postal services. Bad Honnef, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • WIK: (2006) Main developments in the postal sector (2004–2006). Bad Honnef, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cátia Felisberto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Felisberto, C. Liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector. Empir Econ 44, 1407–1434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0573-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0573-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation