Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the effect of tibial rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on clinical outcomes and assess the eventual cut-off values for tibial TKA rotation leading to poor outcomes.

Methods

A detailed and systematic search from 1997 to 2017 of the Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and the Google Scholar databases was performed using the keyword terms “total knee arthroplasty”, “total knee replacement”, “tibial alignment”, “tibial malalignement”, “tibial rotation”, “rotational error”, “axis”, “angle”, “tibial malrotation”, “clinical outcome”, in several combinations. The modified Coleman scoring methodology (mCMS) was used. All the primary TKAs studies analyzing correlation between clinical results and tibial rotation were included.

Results

Five articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 333 arthroplasties were included in this review; 139 had tibial component malalignment, while 194 were in control groups. The mean age of patients was 67.3 (SD 0.57) years. The mean average postoperative follow-up delay was 34.7 months (range 21–70). The mean mCMS score was 59.2 points indicating good methodological quality in the included studies. Functional outcomes were assessed through KSS, OKS, KOOS and VAS, negatively related to tibial internal rotation.

Conclusions

Our review confirmed that excessive internal rotation of the tibial TKA component represents a significant risk factor for pain and inferior functional outcomes after TKA (> 10° of internal rotation demonstrated the common value), since external rotation does not affect the results. However, a universal precise cut-off value has not been found in the available literature and there remains a debate about CT rotation assessment and surgical intra-operative landmarks.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldini A, Indelli PF, De Luca L, Cerulli Mariani PP, Marcucci M (2013) Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: the anterior tibial cortex is a reliable landmark. Joints 1(4):155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bédard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR (2011) Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(8):2346–2355

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, Blyth M, McLean A (2014) Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):272–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin J (2006) Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:405–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cobbs JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F (2008) The anatomical tibial axis. Reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:1032–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai Y, Scuderi GR, Biischoff JE, Bertin K, Tarabichi S, Rajgopal A (2014) Anatomic tibial component design can increase tibial coverage and rotational alignment accuracy: a comparison of six contemporary designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2911–2923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. De Valk EJ, Noorduyn JC, Mutsaerts EL (2016) How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3517–3528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Walker SA, Tucker A (2004) A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (428):180–189

  13. Hirschmann MT, Amsler F, Rasch H (2015) Clinical value of SPECT/CT in the painful total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study in a consecutive series of 100 TKA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(12):1869–1882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(5):629–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huddleston JI, Scott RD, Wimberley DW (2005) Determination of neutral tibial rotational alignment in rotating platform TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Nakahara H, Okamoto S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Internal rotation of femoral component affects functional activities after TKA—survey with the 2011 Knee Society Score. Arthroplasty 29(12):2319–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kessler O, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB, Mayr E, Bottlang M (2006) Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 21(6):603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuriyama S, Ishikawa M, Furu M, Ito H, Matsuda S (2014) Malrotated tibial component increases medial collateral ligament tension in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 32(12):1658–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stockl B (2011) Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(3):293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH (2002) The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses–a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 17(2):140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lützner J, Kirschner S, Günther KP, Harman MK (2012) Patients with no functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty show different kinematics. Int Orthop 36(9):1841–1847

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin S, Saurez A, Ismaily S, Ashfaq K, Noble P, Incavo SJ (2014) Maximizing tibial coverage is detrimental to proper rotational alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(1):121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1238–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford levels of evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-level-of-evidence/. Accessed May 2016

  26. Osano K, Nagamine R, Todo M, Kawasaki M (2014) The effect of malrotation of tibial component of total knee arthroplasty on tibial insert during high flexion using a finite element analysis. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:695028

  27. Schiapparelli FF, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2017) Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotational of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4586-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Tartarone M (2009) Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 10(3):111–118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Schiavone Panni A, Falez F, D’Apolito R, Corona K, Perisano C, Vasso M (2017) Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant. Int Orthop 41(6):1155–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Slevin O, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2016) No correlation between coronal alignment of total knee arthroplasty and clinical outcomes: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4400-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Steinbrück A, Schröder C, Woiczinski M, Müller T, Müller PE, Jansson V et al (2016) Influence of tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty on knee kinematics and retropatellar pressure: an in vitro study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(8):2395–2401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M et al (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36(12):2473–2478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Thielemann FW, Konstantinids L, Herget GW, Knothe D, Helwig P, Sudkamp NP, Hauschild O (2016) Effect of rotational component alignment on clinical outcome 5 to 7 years after TKA with the columbus knee system. Orthopedics 39(3 Suppl):S50–S55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thornhill TS (2002) Painful total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25(9):965–967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Toms AD, Mandalia V, Haigh R, Hopwood B (2009) The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2):143–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Valkering KP, Breugem SJ, van den Bekerom MP, Tuinebreijer WE, Van Geenen RC (2015) Effect of rotational alignment on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 86(4):432–439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Verlinden C, Uvin P, Labey L et al (2010) The influence of malrotation of the femoral component in total knee replacement on the mechanics of patellofemoral contact during gait: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(5):737–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wasielewski RC, Komistek RD, Zingde SM, Sheridan KC, Mahfouz MR (2008) Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2662–2668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Ascione.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding has been received for this study.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not applicable to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panni, A.S., Ascione, F., Rossini, M. et al. Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 1636–1644 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4823-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4823-0

Keywords

Navigation